Dr. Strangelove

Don't forget the primary goal of the conservative movement: cutting taxes for the wealthy. That's it, that's their goal. And if it means denouncing Democracy and vomiting out talking points from the Kremlin, they won't hesitate to do it.

I tried to address this in my post, that outside of genetic mutation or rare instances, there are two sexes. The vast majority of people are going to either have XX or XY chromosomes. I get that some individuals fall outside of this boundary, but it's 1% of the population, probably less. Liberals tripping over themselves to make this issue a defining characteristic of their party are fighting the wrong battle and costing themselves elections. Trying to equate Gender with Sex is one of the biggest mistakes they've made electorally speaking.

I'm old enough to remember the argument that Gender and Sex were different, and thus it's possible to identify with any Gender one wishes - it is a social construct. Biological sex is concrete: barring extreme genetic mutation, one is either Male (XY) or Female (XX). Liberals tripping over themselves to one-up each other into arguing that biological sex exists on a spectrum is monumentally stupid.

The right wing succumbing to the propaganda of the Kremlin is unsurprising. Is this going to cost Republicans votes? No. The only thing worse than the Kremlin are Democrats. They want to help the poor and raise taxes on the wealthy, which simply cannot be tolerated.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. I think nothing is more hilarious than conservative denial when it comes to science that contradicts them.

This is what happens when a an entire political party downplays a deadly virus - while simultaneously downplaying the vaccine for it. The Republican Party has caused so much unnecessary harm to people, it's absolutely disgusting. Suing to stop healthcare expansion over the last decade, COVID denial and vaccine mistrust, and so many other policies. I hope the conservative voters on this board are proud of their accomplishments.

The left wing media deleted that one, their power and ability to switch tactics on a dime are unrivaled.

Nebraska - 20 Rutgers - 24 Rushing: 125 Passing: 235

The difference is I don't support that candidate after those reports come out. Unlike for Republican voters, actions like holding a gun to their wife's head, having numerous children and lying about their existence and an obvious inability to understand the world around them is enough to make me not vote for them. The economy, on average, performs better under Democrats than Republicans and by a considerable amount. Welcome aboard, your vote is necessary to combat the undemocratic and anti-American politics of the party you used to support!

Watching them all one-up each other is going to be hilarious. If he commits a felony and some audio recording emerges of him threatening his wife with a gun, he might just be a lock.

All that matters is that he votes R. He isn't a Dem, and that's good enough. The race right now is very slightly in Warnock's favor, by 1%, maybe less. However, over the last 3 weeks momentum has returned to Republican candidates. Over the next 4 weeks, I would expect that to continue and Walker to win by 1-2%. It seems likely that Republicans flip the Senate by winning in GA, NV and an outside shot in NH and PA. I'd guess that Rs control the Senate 52-48 and ends up with a 15-20 seat House majority.

Thing is, Walker is probably a slight favorite in the race. I'm assuming a little bit of movement towards Republicans as election day nears.

Herschel Walker upping his game to appeal to Republican voters by adding disingenuous hypocrite to his resume. This will boost him at least 5 points among Republican voters.

He voted against the CR - which contained $18 Billion of FEMA funding - because he thinks government in general is a waste. It's his own moronic fault. It would've taken longer on a legislative calendar to vote for it as a stand alone bill, and the politicians know it. However, the voters in Florida think Gubmint is bad, so their politicians vote against funding it. I say my tax money shouldn't bail out their poor choices, let the citizens of Florida pick themselves up by their bootstraps.

I agree, however, it's high time to start treating Republican voters as adults and not like blinded children incapable of differentiating culture war nonsense from real problems. Start giving them what they want. If their politicians don't want disaster relief, don't provide it. If they don't want food stamps, Medicare, or other government programs they consider a waste, don't give it to them. Let's stop dragging Republican states forward kicking and screaming.

This says a lot about the citizens of Florida. They aren't going to punish those Senators for their vote. My opinion is - if both your state Senators vote against something, why do the rest of the states force it on them? If Senators Scott and Rubio want to treat votes as a theater, we should not allow federal dollars to be forced into a state that doesn't want it. The citizens of Florida can decide on the next election if they want relief money for the next hurricane that wallops them.

The racism at the end really put this over the top. It's a real race to the bottom between DeSantis and Trump on who will capture the hearts and minds of these Republican voters.

CPAC is the second best American propaganda arm the Kremlin has. The best being Tucker Carlson of course.

Great news. Surely you favor Democrat Mark Kelly over Republican Blake Masters in the AZ Senate race, as well as Hobbs (D) over Lakes (R) in the Governors race in that same state. You surely will change your support from Herschel Walker to Warnock after you find out Walker said "there was country wide election fraud" and that "true patriots" need to conduct "a total cleansing" to get to the bottom of it, among other false statements. Or away from any of the dozens of House Republicans running in races who deny the results of the 2020 election. Unless, of course, you're displaying typical Republican cognitive dissonance of completely ignoring the uncomfortable aspects of the political party you favor in order to justify your own support for it.

Indiana - 38 Nebraska - 24 Passing: 225 Rushing: 180

I for one am shocked that DeSantis apparently voted in ways as a Congressman that suggested he was just a giant tool and not at all interested in helping the people he represents. But, in all honesty, maybe the government should loan money to Florida for disaster cleanup. The citizens of Florida, being as anti-socialist as they come, can repay at prevailing interest rates. It was, after all, the personal choice of individuals to live in Fort Myers/Cape Coral, an area of a state battered by hurricanes at the mouth of a river 5 feet above sea level. Personally, I chose not to do that and as such, my tax money shouldn't subsidize their poor choices.

Your current voting behavior - and that of the Republican constituency - would suggest otherwise.

@Archy1221 knows exactly what the "rambling" was. He supports Walker because of the R next to his name, despite him clearly not understanding the world around him, his personal history and violence towards women, and general nonsense that comes from his mouth. But as a conservative Republican, his support really hinges on whether or not a particular candidate is ready to overthrow Democracy after lying about the election results. Unfortunately for Warnock, he doesn't fit that criteria and thus will not get the support of Archy.

It is funny. But, if the people of Missouri wanted poor kids to have food, they'd vote differently. The people of Missouri elect politicians that enact the legislation they desire, as such, my blame is squarely on them.

When your entire political party is built on grifting people via culture wars so you can cut taxes for the wealthy and nominate hacks to the Judiciary, this is what you end up with.