Nebfanatic

Kanye had a 2 hour interview come out today and I think he said alot of things that change your perspective a bit on where he is coming from. If you have the time, I reccomend watching it. The interview can be found at the link below. https://wegotlove.com

Count me in as liking these. They look good.

Thats a really solid test rating so perhaps we should. I'd be interested to see what his ball skills were like, but I think he has the tools physically to develop into a big body reciever after a year or 2 in S&C.

Don't think he is too slow for reciever. 4.8 laser at 17 years old isn't bad.

We have found ourselves much more in the national spotlight with Frost as our coach.

4.3 laser is movin. One of the fastest times you will ever see a HS senior run.

Very impressive

And the ones who have entered the league already. Its a flawed way to look at it, even if you multiplied the numbers by 3 to give a more year by year look. That gets you to the 58% you have been talking about but even that is flawed. I'd say the best way would be to do it backwards rather than forwards meaning start with one recruiting cycle and wait until everyone finishes their careers, then evaluate how many from that class were eventually drafted.

The thing is if you went with a one year method you would see a higher percentage of players drafted. It would be closer to 19 of 33 players were drafted. Regardless, they were consistent in how they gathered the data so it doesn't matter. They had numbers for all of the other stars so here are the chances of making the NFL based on your star rating based on the numbers given. 5 star-19%(19/100) 4 star-7.5%(67/901) 3 star-2.6%(107/4032) 2 star-0.6%(18/2644) Unranked- 0.3%(21/6775)

If there were 100 5 stars between 13-15 or whatever they used and 19 got drafted then 19% of the 5 stars got drafted. The 8% means out of all of the players, 5 stars make up 8% of the draftees. Pretty impressive number considering less than 1% of prospects are 5 star prospects.

So 5 stars are still the most successful players. Clocking in at an almost 20% draft rate is a fair amount better than any other group

Can you add not South Dakota State and not UNK while we are at it? We can have 10 right answers

If Patterson is the answer that is. He is a talented guy but it may take a little time

Why though?

Created by systematic racism

There was a fair amount of blitzing Saturday

Just went back and looked and it was with 13:30 left in the 2nd and the intended reciever was Austin Allen. They had thrown a bubble to Lindsey going west the play before then they motioned Lindsey east the next play to fake the bubble, Williams ran a post on the outside to clear the CB, then Allen ran a wheel behind him to the open space. If Gebbia was on target it would have been a thing of beauty.

I thought we did see something like that but Gebbia underthrew Stoll I think it was. He pumped on the bubble and then underthrew a wide open reciever with a path to the endzone.

So in the NFL, where most players will have to have some form of pain killer and most players will endure a concussion, you are telling me you think opiods are the better solution as opposed to cannabis? Why should cannabis be banned by the NFL? Also, real science has actually shown cannabis is a neuroprotectant. It helps your brain. So in the NFL where concussions are prevalent, I think that should be looked at. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6630507

Would be surprised if he didn't get quite a bit of PT. Secondary isn't the Sooners strongest group and reports out of Norman say he has been impressive

https://fusion.tv/video/2778/harvard-psychiatrist-says-weed-heals-concussions/ Im not even find anything about addiction because its just facts. Weed is not physically addictive like opiods. The do have that its called cbd and alot of people use it, that said the THC provides medicinal value as well and cbd works best when complimented with THC. I don't have a problem with unbanning HGH but it is a performance enhancer so I undertand why it is banned. Why is weed banned? It certainly doesn't enhance performance on the field. Also don't opiods get you 'stoned'? Is that the only value in that? Saying 99% of medical use is just to get stoned is a pretty perposterous statement

Just don't. Not even in the same league as perscription drugs when it comes to addiction and that is scientific fact. Its also scientific fact that cannabis protects the brain and speeds recovery of concussions so it is really ridiculous the NFL bans the substance.

No one has made it this simple, but the fact of the matter is the system in place is not working for the American people, and some of that stems directly from a capitalistic approach to healthcare.

One encouraging sign....our D could actually defend the sideline throws today!

You convieniently left out the very next line. Healthcare should not be a for profit enterprise. Yes we are a capitalistic market, but must we have this ideology for every facet of our lives? Seems leveraging someones poor health for as much cash as possible is creating an unsustainable system.