Decoy73

Simply stated and likely the best option at this point.

I can’t stop being a fan. But I can stop being a dumb s#!t. Although it usually takes a day or two post game. Rhule is very much the guy for the job. MN doesn’t change that at all. This thread needs to die.

1. I learned a new coaching staff with an entire offseason isn’t enough to overcome what has plagued this team for over 10 years. Turnovers and stupid penalties that turn what should have been a win over an average to below average team to another gut-wrenching loss. They’re chokers and have been for a long time. 2. I’ve likely gone to my last away game for a while. Maybe ever. Not a knock on Minnesota fans. Just not fun anymore. 3. I’ll have more spending money next year when I more than likely won’t renew my season tickets. note: I still think Trev and Rhule are the best people for the job right now. I’m just fatigued from being a fan. The disappointment of fHCSF was the last straw.

Nebraska Football. A losing tradition.

Big Ten refs. That’s how.

New attendance WR for women’s sports. Impressive!

Game Day is overrated, but we’re 7.5 point dogs to unranked MN, so they’re not wrong disrespecting us until we give them a reason to not.

Turnover margin is the key factor. If we’re positive, we win 8 minimum. If we’re negative again, we win 5 at most. That being said, I’d bet us covering against Michigan and Iowa. Also, northwestern covering, but losing to us.

No doubt in my mind this has at least something to do with it. I just hope it doesn’t someday chase Trev or Coach Rhule away too.

If I’m Fani Willis, I’m exhibiting this at trial. Look, the defendant is admitting to election interference. Then hoping he takes the stand to clarify. Oh the chance to cross examine TFG would be priceless.

I understand. It’s an attempt to make it look like he really thinks he won and it was rigged. It could make the prosecution case more complicated, but all they need is one person to testify that Trump knew he lost. In that case, the conspiracy charge is pretty rock solid, IMO.

With this “conclusive “ report, he’s doing nothing but trying to shed doubt on the fact that he knew he lost the election. Legal strategy pure and simple.

I would guess after appeals, just because of the potential ramifications of it. Plus his buddy CT oversees GA for the SCOTUS. So I’m sure it would go all the way up there. However, if there are co-conspirators convicted, then shouldn’t there be equal treatment for all? Unfortunately, I just don’t see Trump doing any serious time behind bars because of our multi-tiered justice system.

The geography makes some sense, but the Northern POD would be the new B1G West. Of course Iowa would get the easy draw again. SMH

Of course, but a plea is not a conviction. I’m guessing you meant guilty verdict. Instead of “guilty plea.”

Who said anything about a guilty plea?

I agree, however I could see rogue attorney generals “manufacturing” felony charges against leading candidates of the opposite party. So It would have to be a federal crime felony, but even then the potential for corruption would exist. If this country elects a felon who is in prison, we truly are doomed. I mean, we clearly are a stupid country, but are we really that stupid?

So if the J6 indictment comes, does that get lumped in with the documents charges for one big trial or would it be a separate trial at a different court/location?

Chris would be better off as a Democrat. The GOP voting base doesn’t want to hear the truth or facts about anything that might shed their dear leader in a negative light. DeSantis knows this and that’s why he does what he does. He’s banking on TFG being incarcerated in order to get a shot. Christie has absolutely no shot with this pathetic modern GOP and that’s pretty sad.

He couldn’t be trusted to commit to that. Plus, then that would effectively label this as a political prosecution.

Or so that his wackos demand that the next Republican POTUS pardons him. Which I believe is likely to happen anyway.

Hired/planted. Whichever.

Maybe in your mind. Call me out if it makes you feel better. I don’t care. I’m not a hired poster.

You can disagree with the bill or not, I don't care. I do care about your original post's source was intentionally misleading and false. The Bill doesn't spell it out, but this was in Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/store-retail-violence-robbery-theft-stealing-california-1804565

So you think employers should be able to require employees to confront shoplifters. Note that hired security guards are exempt from the bill.