Good question. I'd say that we do not have enough data to say definatively. It will take more time to see if there is some sustained success.
But wow, what a high benchmark to set! To compare any system to the success that the Devany/Osborne in their day is a tall order. The NU offensive system, operative in the 70's, 80's and early 90's (which itself evolved) will likely never see an equal --- or even a close competitor. That said, that was then and this is now.
While there is not yet enough data to be certain, impressions are possible. I can say this --- I am not sold on the Callahan system. My biggest concern is that it appears that a 1st year QB will struggle and that that season will be an unlikely one in which to really compete for a top 10 slot. Of course, that can be argued to be the case for all systems --- to varying degrees --- but none so much so as the Cally offense. Plus, his play calling......
what is amazing to me is how Stoops can put his offense in the hands of a freshman qb and have it look so efficient......thoughts?
My thoughts about this question are, OU runs a spread-attack offense where the defenses are stretched from sideline to sideline. This type of offense is used a lot in college and high school so players can pick it up quickly. Throw in some fast, talented wideouts and RBs and there you go. My personal choice would to use this. But I am not the coach. Just dont tell my armchair that
Anyways, our WCO isnt going anywhere soon so its really up to these guys to learn the plays if they want to see the field.