EbylHusker

Real Madrid looked scary good today, especially considering it was an away game against a quality team like Liverpool.

If KB is an embarrassment then Nebraska has it good. Alabama player seems to be rooming with Mary Jane Winston Gurley At least wait to see if bell makes a statement before we hang him by his fro I never claimed Nebraska didn't have it good when you look at some other player issues at schools. However, this is a pattern of behavior with Bell and isn't anything new. I've been more than ready for him to gtfo of Lincoln for quite a while now.

Bell has been a good receiver for us and I'm proud of what he's done for us on the field. Off the field, though...he's a bit of an embarrassment.

"Apologists"...lol. Your posts are seriously entertaining with this.

I was thinking the exact same thing. It gave me the mental image of a really excited Royals fan being all cheery, then suddenly a kid runs up and kicks him in the balls.

No one is interested in the uncalled DPIs.

No, because calling it there was not in any way a "dick move." Nor was it the refs being jealous about not having a say in the outcome (serious lulz there). It was just about the only possible outcome. So if you remove your first two lines from the post, sure we agree.

That's just it, though. If you run a proper rub, it's done in a way that it's so borderline it rarely gets called. The risk is worth the reward. When you do what they did, you're going to get flagged almost every time. It's like the difference between the mild line holding you see almost every play and some lineman literally grabbing a guy and dragging him down as he tries to disengage. One is considered borderline and usually not called, the other will get the laundry pretty much every time.

It was clearly offensive pass interference. To even claim otherwise is a f'ing joke. And this is coming from someone who very much would have liked to see FSU lose.

Big win for the Chiefs!

Yes, that's the smoker.

So which mod got their panties in a wad? There was nothing wrong with that post and it wasn't breaking any rules. Typical of this place.

This is satisifaction...

Not sure, but I'd definitely f#*k her before Rambo.

I don't know about "dream," but the Jaguar F-Type R is gorgeous from every angle and is a good car. It's also realistically priced.

The only one I've been watching is Gotham. The Strain was pretty good, though it's not being shown atm.

That appeared to be the intent, yes.

It was awesome, as expected. Hopefully house bitch Rick is gone forever.

Applying logical thought to a situation where someone is depressed enough to actually kill themselves doesn't really work. It's essentially the same as attempting to project your own thoughts onto a serial killer and then wondering why they're so mean they feel the need to kill people. Serial killers do not think like you do (presumably), and neither do people who are depressed enough to kill themselves.

Oh yes, NOW I remember Dr. Singer better. He was linked with tobacco money for his stance on second hand smoke not being dangerous, and has been linked with oil company money for his stance on global warming. He's also said, in response to both, that it doesn't matter where his funding comes from. There is not an emoticon available to properly convey my amusement toward Singer's antics.

Again, holy sh#t... For one, when you copy someone elses review of a book, you might want to put it in quotes, or something else that offsets it, so it doesn't look like you're trying to pass off someone else's professional writing as your own. Second, Dr. Singer is outspoken against the health risks of secondhand smoke...lulz. I doubt I need to say more about that. Three, the book was written in 1997 (I think revised in 2001?)...hopefully you understand a lot has changed/been added in 15 or more years. And while Dr. Singer has published some papers on this topic, he seems far more interested in writing books about it. Yes, no monetary motive there whatsoever... As for losing funding if global warming is debunked, that is utter bullsh#t. The ability to understand, model, and predict (when appropriate) past, current, and future global climates is of serious interest in many areas. There would be no lack of funding for anyone doing research in that area, even if it wasn't specifically linked to global warming anymore. So that argument is complete nonsense and only shows a lack of understanding about the current playing field of scientific discussion. And once again, there are far, far more consequences to the average global temperature rising than just hotter summers in South Dakota. And even if they're not as immediate as your numbers, it's still a real issue that needs to be worked on. This isn't a few scientists, but a global consensus of virtually everyone working in the related fields. You can't buy that many people off, there's no conspiracy. And if you could buy that much research, the oil companies would have already done it to promote their interests. But they haven't. If you truly believe the main consequence for discussion is potential discomfort due to hotter summers in South Dakota (or anywhere, really), then there's no point in continuing this discussion. I will leave you to your own thoughts.