Cdog923

You're right; POB and Wilson were targets in his first year-long recruiting cycle.

To be fair, he tried that, but only POB stuck.

And yet, it's still better than The Last Jedi.

To each their own; I prefer the 247 and HV writers to what RSS puts out.

It's like a repository for the worst, least trustful Husker beat writers. Between Clouse and Callahan, it's like a dumpster fire.

That doesn't answer my question: you would rather have Roby guarding Azubuike than Morrow?

You don't think Morrow would have been a better option than Roby?

Kansas and Creighton killed us in areas where having Ed Morrow would have helped by about a factor of a billion.

I saw someone pose this on another forum I frequent, but Last Jedi would have worked much, much better as the finale to this trilogy as opposed to the middle section. I think the investment in both the story and the new characters would be much higher if we actually saw all of these things we've heard about: The Republic being established, the First Order rising from the Outer Rim, Luke beginning his Jedi Academy, and his failure with Ben Solo. Then, you go to The Force Awakens, introduce Rey and end it with Last Jedi.

Maybe. But the further away from Last Jedi I get, the more unfavorable it comes off.

Mighty fine = 1-2 in those three games.

If the Jedi can become Force Ghosts, why can't the Sith?

That OSU self-reporting isn't true, or that OSU is out of the running isn't true?

The consensus from a status update last week was that they are not produced.

Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

This is, essentially where I am at as well. There were some parts that made me smile (The Yoda/Luke scene is absolutely one of my favorite scenes in the entire series) but, the more I sit here and think about it, the less favorable the film comes off. The middle third of the film that encompasses the Casino portion of the storyline and the rational behind it is on par with some of the worst parts of Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones, and Force Awakens.

Oh, nice. I err on the safe side, but that's good to know. Thanks!

I liked it, but didn't love it. It wasn't nearly as good as it could have, or really, should have been, but there are some very entertaining aspects to it.

If this were true, he'd be on his way back.

Yea, but I don't think you have though; you've stated that you are pro-NN, yet you equate social media sites moderating what content is seen to ISPs deciding what content is seen? Isn't there a disconnect in logic there?