No, it doesn't. This is the biggest problem facing rational conversation - the uninformed fall back on a specific position, using the circular logic of "the bible says the bible is true and infallible," and there's nothing more to be said.
The bible is not a historical document, and was never intended to be. It's a collection of stories about a group of people who believe something. It's not a textbook, it's not verified, and it's not proof of anything.
It is either the inspired Word of God or it isn't. Who else has the authority to say otherwise? Why do we need another document from some earthly being to say what the Bible is. When the Bible tells us exactly what it is.
Its a never ending process. If we had this mythological document confirming what the Bible is, then those of you who refute the bible would ask for yet ANOTHER document and another for that one, and another for that one...
The problem is, you'll never get to the end and the idea of "Faith" has to come into play at some point. Until God shows himself (which then makes it completely way to easy to chose) the evidence we have or don't have, will never be enough.
This made me laugh. Why shouldn't it be way to easy to choose?