Moiraine

Who's playing there? On Iowa: I think they're in the top 15 in revenue for college football teams, so they're probably happy with the status quo and scared to change it. On Ferentz: holy CRAP I cannot believe that man is 70. I never found him particularly attractive but I thought he was around 50. (I didn't realize he'd been at Iowa that long because I never paid attention to Iowa until 2011).

On phone and don't wanna link but its on cnn.com

Why stop there? Why not a pentagon with Wilbon? He can line up as a tight end.

Anyone else think we're doing the 2 pt conversion stuff just to give our defense practice?

Tennessee followed by TCU. With the others, we don't really know how bad/good the other opponents are yet. Could be Texas is really good this year. Same goes with Auburn and Wisconsin and Texas A&M and Houston.

Makes sense with the colder weather part.

Ugh. The announcers are obsessing on Ole Miss's speed. For the love of God. I'm sure FSU is super slow.

FSU Ole Miss is another game where I want both teams to lose. But I prefer FSU to the SEC (sans Georgia).

I'm fine with the way it is. We got rid of/are getting rid of the FCS opponents.

I thought we were supposed to be nationalist and not care what other countries think, and one that Trump has mentioned the most is China.

He might be telling his coach that but it's a lie. He may have even convinced himself of it. But 2 of his teammates in his line of vision are walking, and the guy who made the interception is pumping his fist while pointing his finger in the air, clearly not trying to gain yards.

Even for those at the top that actually did not take care of the issue It's not as bad as an actual molestation, not even close. That's like saying if you smoke a joint, the terrorists win. And what are you talking about? He reported it. How do you cover up something when you actually report it? And do I really have to explain what a in quotation "that didn't happen back then" means? That it is not literal and not in reference to when the actual crime took place. It means that roughly prior to late 60's those things were not talked about, or were swept under the table, hence were treated as they did not exist. That was the culture and if you like you can blame all of America for bringing up it's young men and women in that environment. Seriously I shouldn't have to explain this as those are know social criticism's of the era's. Now, one can disagree with me that that is not important, fine I believe it is, but damn at least understand the argument. I believe it's not he's job to be the detective after reporting the issue and that he was a product of the old generation, after all there was nothing to gain for him by creating some masterful deception to protect a pedophile. Did he get money? Fame? No, he got a easily replaceable coach. Now I get that there are differing points of view and thats fine and this thread can just go on in infinity with same exact things being repeated(unfortunately with just a few who can do so coherently without the hyperbole), he's satan, pitchfork, hate Penn state, think of all the children of the world, he's Satan pedo, pitchfork. It's not going to change my mind to keep repeating the same thing and I'm not going to change anyone's mind who believes otherwise. So maybe it's best to just cut and paste all our reply's over and over, save some time? I still think you're going on 4-5 year old news.

Yeah, that's not what he said. Yeah, that's what he said. "Josh made a mistake" "Even though this was done by mistake" "We sincerely apologize for his mistake" ?? For the record I'm not claiming he's saying it was an accident, which I assume is why you're saying he didn't say it was done by mistake when it's exactly what he said? (I can't think of any other explanation). But I still think Miles explanation is laughable as is the punishment.

Miles says it was done by mistake. WTF?

I seem to remember Bo deciding to pay a lot of attention to special teams personally in his last year. It seems like whichever group he focused on did really well.

Yup.

The Germans look like us

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that. lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation? That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump. If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person? Again, please read what I posted How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse??? How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on. It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment. And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID. Why am I trying to explain this for a third time? Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?" I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time. Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post. Well, I stepped in pretty good. I don't know how the hell I skimmed over that, pretty important line.. twice! I would try to blame it on all the games, but that doesn't explain my post a little bit ago.. geez, maybe I should be more careful reading "everything". My fault and my apologizes! No worries. And I'm sorry for the "dumb dumb... libs" comment but I was going crazy, heh.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that. lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation? That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump. If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person? Again, please read what I posted How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse??? How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on. It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment. And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID. Why am I trying to explain this for a third time? Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?" I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time. Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that. The difference is that Hillary is mandated to take training on the classifications of info on a yearly basis just like the rest of us government employees do. We also get training on how to use every program that is needed to do our job. All of the excuses she is using is bogus, especially for someone who has worked in Government for 20-30 years. I believe that is the difference between Hillary and your mother. I would also watch the "reading comprehension" comment because if you remember I was banned for a month for using the same comment. Maybe it won't matter since you favor the left as most of the mods do on here, but I don't want you to get banned for something as silly as I did with no warning. I also wanted to thank you for standing up for me when I was banned. I really appreciated it as it goes to show that even though we may disagree on some topics on here, it shouldn't be personal. First paragraph is sort of related to what I said about Clinton not listening/caring what the people who know about it are saying.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

Too young

Are you aware that we're fans? We can look past every team and onto the playoffs if we so decide and it will have no effect on the outcome of the Wyoming game.

I think we'll be ranked after the Wyoming game if it's a blowout.

After last year? Ain't over 'til it's over.