ronsss Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 i know it was a bad year in 2007.,,,,thats why some many changes happen as a result of it. i was just thinking the other day, what if nebraska had played in the pac 10, where parity was very even last year. ,,,what do you think nu,s conferance record would have been,,,, i am thinking they could have been fighting washington state for being last in the conferance, , nu may have been 1-8, or 2-7... what do you all think their record in the pac 10 , 2007 , would have been??? Quote Link to comment
T_O_Bull Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Don't really care. Quote Link to comment
BigRedPowerWagon Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Football clearly needs to start soon if im reading posts like this one. Quote Link to comment
klemander Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 i know it was a bad year in 2007.,,,,thats why some many changes happen as a result of it. i was just thinking the other day, what if nebraska had played in the pac 10, where parity was very even last year. ,,,what do you think nu,s conferance record would have been,,,, i am thinking they could have been fighting washington state for being last in the conferance, , nu may have been 1-8, or 2-7... what do you all think their record in the pac 10 , 2007 , would have been??? Oh just stop thinking already Quote Link to comment
bethelbacker Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 The parity really doesn't matter when powder puff teams could have scored 50 on us with relatively no problem........ Quote Link to comment
admo Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 i know it was a bad year in 2007.,,,,thats why some many changes happen as a result of it. i was just thinking the other day, what if nebraska had played in the pac 10, where parity was very even last year. ,,,what do you think nu,s conferance record would have been,,,, i am thinking they could have been fighting washington state for being last in the conferance, , nu may have been 1-8, or 2-7... what do you all think their record in the pac 10 , 2007 , would have been??? Losses = USC, Oregon, Arizona State wins = Wash, Stanford, Wash State, Arizona, Calif, UCLA (pick any five) = 5-4 Pac 10 is weak. Quote Link to comment
REDSTEEL Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 i know it was a bad year in 2007.,,,,thats why some many changes happen as a result of it. i was just thinking the other day, what if nebraska had played in the pac 10, where parity was very even last year. ,,,what do you think nu,s conferance record would have been,,,, i am thinking they could have been fighting washington state for being last in the conferance, , nu may have been 1-8, or 2-7... what do you all think their record in the pac 10 , 2007 , would have been??? Losses = USC, Oregon, Arizona State wins = Wash, Stanford, Wash State, Arizona, Calif, UCLA (pick any five) = 5-4 Pac 10 is weak. So what your saying is that none of those teams had a running game or that Nebraska could out score them? Quote Link to comment
admo Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 i know it was a bad year in 2007.,,,,thats why some many changes happen as a result of it. i was just thinking the other day, what if nebraska had played in the pac 10, where parity was very even last year. ,,,what do you think nu,s conferance record would have been,,,, i am thinking they could have been fighting washington state for being last in the conferance, , nu may have been 1-8, or 2-7... what do you all think their record in the pac 10 , 2007 , would have been??? Losses = USC, Oregon, Arizona State wins = Wash, Stanford, Wash State, Arizona, Calif, UCLA (pick any five) = 5-4 Pac 10 is weak. So what your saying is that none of those teams had a running game or that Nebraska could out score them? Does kind of appear that way, huh? I lean towards outscoring. I just like our chances better than those teams. Quote Link to comment
timberghost Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 If Nebraska played in the Pac 10 I'd be doing some deep sea fishing instead of the local farm pond while listening to the game. However you just can't beat a farm pond somedays!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment
Cy the Cyclone Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Butler Davidson Dayton Drake Jacksonville Morehead State San Diego Valparaiso Nebraska would have killed those whimps in the Pioneer League...plus, if they played their cards right, they would have gotten to take two road trips to California and one to Florida... Quote Link to comment
DCHusker Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I disagree with the whole premise of this question. I don't think there's any more parity in the in the Pac-10 than there is in the big 12. The rest of the Pac-10 after Oregon, USC, Cal, Arizona St. is pretty much on par with the rest of the Big 12 after OU, Mizzou, Kansas, and Texas Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 That's a lot of commas. Quote Link to comment
Cy the Cyclone Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 That's a lot of commas. Oh...you said commas! I thought you said comas and was wondering what Husker defense had to do with anything... My bad...carry on. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 i know it was a bad year in 2007.,,,,thats why some many changes happen as a result of it. i was just thinking the other day, what if nebraska had played in the pac 10, where parity was very even last year. ,,,what do you think nu,s conferance record would have been,,,, i am thinking they could have been fighting washington state for being last in the conferance, , nu may have been 1-8, or 2-7... what do you all think their record in the pac 10 , 2007 , would have been??? if the dog wouldn't have stopped to take a sh#t , he would have caught the rabbit. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.