BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 My brother-in-law raised an interesting point Saturday (I couldn't believe it either) that Coach Pelini seems to be following a similar template to what basketball Coach Sadler did this past year in redshirting several players this year for the sake of the future. I would say that it is also following the template that Coach Osborne had established for many years. I think in the long run it will be better for the program. I'm sure many think that Baker Steinkuhler and Will Compton could make an impact now. Yet Coach Pelini seems content on letting them mature a year and plugging those gaps with walk ons he doesn't have to worry about counting against the scholarship totals. In other words why burn their years of eligibility before it is necessary? Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment
SkerMin8r Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 I think you hit the nail squarely on the head here. I believe Bo is setting this team up for future growth and I fully expect that he will do the same next year. In fact...assuming we get Mr. Cody Green on campus I certainly wouldn't be surprised to see him redshirt next year Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 That is also sending a message that he doesn't care about a walk-on's eligibility. Matt Holt is playing as a true frosh walk-on, but it doesn't seem to matter because he is paying his own way. I agree with the build for the future idea, but some could also argue that Pelini is basically writing off this season as a lost cause. Who knows. I don't disagree with what he is doing, but if a guy can contribute and he wants to play, why not play him? Quote Link to comment
Igetbored216 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 That is also sending a message that he doesn't care about a walk-on's eligibility. Matt Holt is playing as a true frosh walk-on, but it doesn't seem to matter because he is paying his own way. I agree with the build for the future idea, but some could also argue that Pelini is basically writing off this season as a lost cause. Who knows. I don't disagree with what he is doing, but if a guy can contribute and he wants to play, why not play him? You mean at the beginning of the season, right? Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 That is also sending a message that he doesn't care about a walk-on's eligibility. Matt Holt is playing as a true frosh walk-on, but it doesn't seem to matter because he is paying his own way. I agree with the build for the future idea, but some could also argue that Pelini is basically writing off this season as a lost cause. Who knows. I don't disagree with what he is doing, but if a guy can contribute and he wants to play, why not play him? You mean at the beginning of the season, right? Yes, of course. It doesn't make much sense to give up the redshirt at this point. Quote Link to comment
huskerswrkhavoc Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 That is also sending a message that he doesn't care about a walk-on's eligibility. Matt Holt is playing as a true frosh walk-on, but it doesn't seem to matter because he is paying his own way. I agree with the build for the future idea, but some could also argue that Pelini is basically writing off this season as a lost cause. Who knows. I don't disagree with what he is doing, but if a guy can contribute and he wants to play, why not play him? You mean at the beginning of the season, right? Yes, of course. It doesn't make much sense to give up the redshirt at this point. but on that same note, what if he can contribute, but the coaches don't feel its a big enough difference to make a win/loss change? say we have compton playing... what game changes? OU and Mizzou are still blowouts.. does it make a difference in Va Tech or Texas Tech? I don't know even then if it would of been worth it then, where they can come in in and make a big difference next year... Quote Link to comment
frazier9495 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Has there been anything saying these guys want to play right now. I would hope that Pelini sat down with these guys to discuss things like this and ended up being a mutual agreement. Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 That is also sending a message that he doesn't care about a walk-on's eligibility. Matt Holt is playing as a true frosh walk-on, but it doesn't seem to matter because he is paying his own way. I agree with the build for the future idea, but some could also argue that Pelini is basically writing off this season as a lost cause. Who knows. I don't disagree with what he is doing, but if a guy can contribute and he wants to play, why not play him? You mean at the beginning of the season, right? Yes, of course. It doesn't make much sense to give up the redshirt at this point. but on that same note, what if he can contribute, but the coaches don't feel its a big enough difference to make a win/loss change? say we have compton playing... what game changes? OU and Mizzou are still blowouts.. does it make a difference in Va Tech or Texas Tech? I don't know even then if it would of been worth it then, where they can come in in and make a big difference next year... I don't know that it changes anything, but you can't tell me that Matt Holt is head and shoulders above Compton. Compton was #2 on the depth chart when Dillard went down and Holt started that game in front of Compton. If you asked Compton, I am sure he'd give anything to be out there playing, but maybe Pelini has sat him down and told him of his plans for him and Compton agrees redshirting is best. I am not second-guessing Pelini for sitting these guys, but it could send a message that he is holding back. Yes, this team is thin, dangerously thin. Why not get some able bodies in there to help build some depth since many of the solid contributors from this team are gone after this year? Quote Link to comment
BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA Posted November 3, 2008 Author Share Posted November 3, 2008 I'd agree that the half way mark or the Tech game would be the point to make a decision whether to burn a redshirt. If Compton had a chance to play half a season as a true Freshman you'd think it would be jumped on because it would give him experience. After the half way mark it would be much harder to justify burning a redshirt. Quote Link to comment
admo Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Could be that BP is learning on the job. Could also be other factors. Normally when numerous young guys get most of the reps day in and day out, play week in and week out, they tend to get better, the light bulb goes on and the game slows down. He must have thought these guys out there were talented enough to improve from week 1 through week 4, and from week 4 through week 8 and so on. That way he could redshirt some of the possible impact freshmen mentioned. Early games against winnable opponents can also masquerade the true talent level on the field. Next season we'll know more if there is a trend with the redshirts or what not. Quote Link to comment
longtimefan Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 At this point in our program I'm all for red shirting about every freshman we have (unless they are so talented that they are 1st string material in August). Let's face it, letting a young freshman come to college and get acclimated to school and football without the huge pressure of having to learn all the football playbook would be beneficial to the kid and the program in the long run. Plus a year later they would be physically better off. We're going to have to bite the bullet a couple of years before this program can get back on it's feet. Quote Link to comment
huskerswrkhavoc Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 At this point in our program I'm all for red shirting about every freshman we have (unless they are so talented that they are 1st string material in August). Let's face it, letting a young freshman come to college and get acclimated to school and football without the huge pressure of having to learn all the football playbook would be beneficial to the kid and the program in the long run. Plus a year later they would be physically better off. We're going to have to bite the bullet a couple of years before this program can get back on it's feet. very well said. knowing how i did last year 1st semester was brutal.. no where near what i thought college would be like.. i cant imagine adding onto that being a starter on the football team..... Quote Link to comment
papersun87 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Semi-off topic: I think Pelini and Sadler are both great coaches, and I'm thrilled that the futures of the football and basketball teams are in their hands. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 I think it's a smart plan and it shows that he is not worried about immediate success, but rather worried about a long-term goal. Very smart IMO. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.