Axl_sued_me Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Not hating but damn. Ganz didn't start playing well until second half. Suh dominated all game including blocking a FG. Also, how was Witt getting the ball knocked out of his hands while his knee was down CBS's play of the game?? Quote Link to comment
Silent Commit Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 I actually was quiet impressed with Ganz. The Tigers were constantly in the backfield harassing him. He had little time to look downfield, yet threw some clutch balls. He was getting pummelled after almost every passing play. A true warrior. However, I would have to agree that Suh deserved the game ball. But, I think that Ganz, despite some mistakes, played hell of a game. Quote Link to comment
cmb23 Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Sorry...Steinkuhler had my vote. Quote Link to comment
WVhuskerXX Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Quarterbacks get all the love from the media....thats just how it is.. Quote Link to comment
808Husker in KCMO Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Alex Henery Quote Link to comment
huskered17 Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Sorry...Steinkuhler had my vote. You got that right. He must have been saving it all for this game. GBR!!! Quote Link to comment
Axl_sued_me Posted January 2, 2009 Author Share Posted January 2, 2009 1. Suh 2. Castille 3. Henery 4. Ganz Ganz mistakes nearly cost Nebraska the game. Quote Link to comment
husker B-rent Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 GANZ........put yourself in his shoes, if you had those guys coming at you on almost every play and almost getting to you every play you would have had a statistically bad game too. he did a hell of a job and he every bit deserved it. Quote Link to comment
Axl_sued_me Posted January 2, 2009 Author Share Posted January 2, 2009 GANZ........put yourself in his shoes, if you had those guys coming at you on almost every play and almost getting to you every play you would have had a statistically bad game too. he did a hell of a job and he every bit deserved it. I understand that. The kid showed heart. I'll say that we could not of won without Ganz. But let's be real here. Suh destroyed them from opening kickoff until probably next week since their o-line, rb's, and qb will be having nightmares of Suh's angry face for that long. Suh freaking dominated and was key. Quote Link to comment
husker B-rent Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 ok, then could we have won without suh and with our second string in? you just said we couldnt do it without ganz, so what about suh? Quote Link to comment
Axl_sued_me Posted January 2, 2009 Author Share Posted January 2, 2009 ok, then could we have won without suh and with our second string in? you just said we couldnt do it without ganz, so what about suh? MVP is not for feel good stories. It's for playmakers. Ganz made two turnovers that nearly cost Nebraska the game. What more do you want?? Quote Link to comment
clone Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 How did Joe Ganz get the game's MVP and not Suh?? cuz I predicted the GANZINATOR would be the playa of the game. It was totally rigged. Quote Link to comment
tattooedhusker Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Sorry...Steinkuhler had my vote. without a doubt! Quote Link to comment
husker B-rent Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 ok, then could we have won without suh and with our second string in? you just said we couldnt do it without ganz, so what about suh? MVP is not for feel good stories. It's for playmakers. Ganz made two turnovers that nearly cost Nebraska the game. What more do you want?? no its not. but that is not the question i asked. would we have won without ganz? would we have won without suh? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.