Jump to content


Favre


holvy83

Recommended Posts


As a long time Vikings fan, I don't know what to think of this. On one hand, the Vikings are getting a quarterback that they desperately needed. His presence should stop defenses from putting 8 or 9 men in the box, which would make the Vikings running game (AD) that much more potent. The Vikings receivers are actually pretty good. Rosenfels and Jackson, though, aren't capable of getting the balls into their hands consistently. There is no doubt that the Vikings are a much better team - TALENT-WISE - with Favre than without him. On the other hand, the Vikings have signed (or will sign) an aging-prima donna-gunslinger who has been selfish (won't sign earlier to avoid training camp) and a distraction (according to Jet players). i'm not sure if Bret could even make it through 16 games without getting injured. But, the game in Green Bay this year, with Favre playing, will be the highest viewed NFL game next to the Super Bowl.....

Link to comment

Tis a sad day in the NFL, i think ive lost all faith that someone will finally tell Farve to go screw himself and either retire or sit on the free agent list.

 

Anyone want to vote Farve for the Worst NFL Duechebag Award?

 

The only way he is gonna stop playing is a career ending injury, me thinks. Anyone have a saw? We can probably saw off his hand or something.

Link to comment

all things aside, i think it is a good move for the Vikings, now Jackson and "Cy" Rosenfels can learn from one of the best QB's of our generation. If anything it should put some of Jackson's ego on hold until he can actually learn to perform at a high level in the NFL. And yes, much anticipating the Green Bay match up and what kind of production that will be :)

Link to comment

As a long time Vikings fan, I don't know what to think of this. On one hand, the Vikings are getting a quarterback that they desperately needed. His presence should stop defenses from putting 8 or 9 men in the box, which would make the Vikings running game (AD) that much more potent. The Vikings receivers are actually pretty good. Rosenfels and Jackson, though, aren't capable of getting the balls into their hands consistently. There is no doubt that the Vikings are a much better team - TALENT-WISE - with Favre than without him. On the other hand, the Vikings have signed (or will sign) an aging-prima donna-gunslinger who has been selfish (won't sign earlier to avoid training camp) and a distraction (according to Jet players). i'm not sure if Bret could even make it through 16 games without getting injured. But, the game in Green Bay this year, with Favre playing, will be the highest viewed NFL game next to the Super Bowl.....

:yeah

Link to comment

I laughed out loud when I heard about this on the radio at work this morning...Plus it was fun being able to break the news to the resident Vikings fan and Packers fan at work.

I don't usually follow the NFL much, but was glad to see him try another comeback.

 

I AM, however really really tired of people bitching about him unretiring or skipping training camp.

 

That, and still having at least one channel showing Michael Jackson related crap every night.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...