ronsss Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles Quote Link to comment
Ponderosa Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 Check out the article posted by Nexus... Bob Devaney had idea for Big Ten move in 1992 Also, are you familiar with the CIC...? Quote Link to comment
General Blackshirt Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 I'm debating with myself about if you're a Tuff Tiger imitator or not. I don't think you are, but it's a possibility. Having said that: Have you seen/read/heard/watched ANY type of expansion coverage in the past 2 months? At all? Quote Link to comment
corncraze Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles accordingly they wont base the divisions by east-west, but more on rivalry based. We probably will play PSU, Iowa, and Wisconsin every year, and some analyts think we'll share a cross over game with Michigan every year. Add to that that we will play OSU probably alot in the championship game, we have anything but a weak schedule. The Big 10 just got better than the Big 12, besides we won't be in the weak side of an unbalanced division like we were in the Big 12. Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 Some folks dont like it. They seem to be the minority , but just the same it is their opinion. Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles accordingly they wont base the divisions by east-west, but more on rivalry based. We probably will play PSU, Iowa, and Wisconsin every year, and some analyts think we'll share a cross over game with Michigan every year. Add to that that we will play OSU probably alot in the championship game, we have anything but a weak schedule. The Big 10 just got better than the Big 12, besides we won't be in the weak side of an unbalanced division like we were in the Big 12. Hey corncraze, glad to see you finally come around on the Big Ten. I remember we debated the pros/cons in a couple threads a month or so ago. Quote Link to comment
bleedNUred Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 Not everybody is going to like it but I do, yeah there's cons to it but way more pros to it in the long run especially. Quote Link to comment
kansas husker Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 How about the fact that we are no longer in a conference that can be held hostage by one school. If the big 12 had accpeted the big 8 history, if the conference were ran fairly, and if there was equal revenue sharing. I would also appose the move, but since none of those happened. I'm all for the move Quote Link to comment
redblooded Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles Okay. If you cant bring yourself to realize that it was in the best interest of the University and State with all the reasons that were stated over and over for months before it became official I don't know what to tell you. Most people like the move. Beyond that the debate about going there is over. It happened so your options are limited to basically get over it and get on board. Quote Link to comment
commando Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles guess the academic prestige and economic advantages for the state of Nebraska are not very high on your list either. Quote Link to comment
hskerprid Posted July 4, 2010 Share Posted July 4, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles I've never been a grammar Nazi before. For the love of God would you please punctuate correctly. There's, don't not there,s, don,t Sorry Quote Link to comment
HUSKER 37 Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 I have to admit.. I felt the same way as the OP for the first week. I've hated all things Big-10 pretty much all my life...especially last year when I had to go to a bar to watch Nebraska play while the BTN was showing three different B-10 games on my TV at home. I'm not too ashamed to say I'm not too old and set in my ways to admit some of you guys were able to change my mind. The research grant/AIC thing was the kicker for me. Now I have a whole season to start liking the product...Or Maybe my team can make the conference watchable the next season. Quote Link to comment
corncraze Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles accordingly they wont base the divisions by east-west, but more on rivalry based. We probably will play PSU, Iowa, and Wisconsin every year, and some analyts think we'll share a cross over game with Michigan every year. Add to that that we will play OSU probably alot in the championship game, we have anything but a weak schedule. The Big 10 just got better than the Big 12, besides we won't be in the weak side of an unbalanced division like we were in the Big 12. Hey corncraze, glad to see you finally come around on the Big Ten. I remember we debated the pros/cons in a couple threads a month or so ago. Dr. Tom won me over haha... that and I really saw the powers of Texas during that whole b12 melodrama. I look ridiculous now dnt I? But I did say we should only make the move if it was absolutely necessary, I now realize that it was. Besides might as well put a positive spin on the situation and accept it now that the move has happened Think I desrve one of these though Quote Link to comment
corncraze Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 I have to admit.. I felt the same way as the OP for the first week. I've hated all things Big-10 pretty much all my life...especially last year when I had to go to a bar to watch Nebraska play while the BTN was showing three different B-10 games on my TV at home. I'm not too ashamed to say I'm not too old and set in my ways to admit some of you guys were able to change my mind. The research grant/AIC thing was the kicker for me. Now I have a whole season to start liking the product...Or Maybe my team can make the conference watchable the next season. Pretty much my situation Quote Link to comment
VA Husker Fan Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 IIRC, the OP already started not one, but two threads wondering why we didn't try to get in the PAC 10, mostly because he lives in AZ, I think. At this point, all of the whining in the world isn't going to change the decision, so as someone else said, you might as well appreciate what's best for the university and not be so selfish. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.