GMoose Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Bo knows quarterbacks. Watson knows nothing about coaching QB's and don't even bringup Ganz the turnover machine. DON'T TAKE THE NAME OF GANZ IN VAIN Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 I don't have a clue what he really meant either. It could be taken to mean so very many different things. Who knows? Everything about our offense is still up in the air. Are we really going to get serious about developing a power rushing game? Or "sling the ball all around"? Or continue to be a jack of all trades but a master of none? I don't know but we're going to find out soon (thank God). We are going to be a master of running our 'multiple' scheme on offense. This does not mean we must be one dimensional. Many teams have been known to both run and pass the ball over the course of a football game. Quote Link to comment
rawhide Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 I think they already know who the starter will be but want to keep it under wraps so nobody transfers. psy 201 ?? GBR that's right dangnabbit I said the T word Quote Link to comment
jimindallas Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 If this team goes tribal, I think we'll see Bo get medieval in a hurry. 1 Quote Link to comment
HuskerGBR Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 If this team goes tribal, I think we'll see Bo get medieval in a hurry. Best post evah! I am sure you guys have seen this pic, but that made me think of this. Quote Link to comment
deedsker15 Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Bo knows quarterbacks. Watson knows nothing about coaching QB's and don't even bringup Ganz the turnover machine. DON'T TAKE THE NAME OF GANZ IN VAIN he was a gunslinger...but he was one hell of a gunslinger Quote Link to comment
jsneb83 Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Bo knows quarterbacks. Watson knows nothing about coaching QB's and don't even bringup Ganz the turnover machine. DON'T TAKE THE NAME OF GANZ IN VAIN he was a gunslinger...but he was one hell of a gunslinger Better than Keller. Quote Link to comment
bshirt Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 I don't have a clue what he really meant either. It could be taken to mean so very many different things. Who knows? Everything about our offense is still up in the air. Are we really going to get serious about developing a power rushing game? Or "sling the ball all around"? Or continue to be a jack of all trades but a master of none? I don't know but we're going to find out soon (thank God). We are going to be a master of running our 'multiple' scheme on offense. This does not mean we must be one dimensional. Many teams have been known to both run and pass the ball over the course of a football game. Well, it would be great to "excel" at something offensively. Especially when we're playing something better than SunBelt teams that identity could come in real handy. But anyway....it's great that you're happy with what we do. I hope with all my heart that you're right and we develop crushing "multiple" offenses for many years. Quote Link to comment
jsneb83 Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 I don't have a clue what he really meant either. It could be taken to mean so very many different things. Who knows? Everything about our offense is still up in the air. Are we really going to get serious about developing a power rushing game? Or "sling the ball all around"? Or continue to be a jack of all trades but a master of none? I don't know but we're going to find out soon (thank God). We are going to be a master of running our 'multiple' scheme on offense. This does not mean we must be one dimensional. Many teams have been known to both run and pass the ball over the course of a football game. Well, it would be great to "excel" at something offensively. Especially when we're playing something better than SunBelt teams that identity could come in real handy. But anyway....it's great that you're happy with what we do. I hope with all my heart that you're right and we develop crushing "multiple" offenses for many years. We excelled at going three and out, doesn't that count for something. Quote Link to comment
HuskerBill85 Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 How far is Taylor Martinez from being ready to be a starter in college football? Quote Link to comment
IceMan Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 That has been the coaching staffs standard reply to any questions regarding positions! However it does make you wonder if we had a a clear cut winner at quarterback if he would still say the same thing. I'm guessing he would! Bo will always make anyone bleed for their position! The Bigger question is if offense can't produce what happens to Wats?? Quote Link to comment
Husker_x Posted July 11, 2010 Author Share Posted July 11, 2010 How far is Taylor Martinez from being ready to be a starter in college football? That would be one you'd want to ask the coaches. If he could immediately transfer to any team in the nation, he's probably ready to go right now. At Nebraska he'll have to beat out a senior and a touted sophomore to prove he's ready. My guess is Taylor will see playing time in the Wildcat formation and backup duties. He's a heck of an athletic player you wouldn't want to keep on the bench. Quote Link to comment
Captain K Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 How far is Taylor Martinez from being ready to be a starter in college football? With the guys we have in front of him, not very far. The guys who are coming in are the ones I'm excited about. I'm just hoping someone surfaces that is better than the Lee I saw last year. Yes the Oline is the most important piece of the puzzle offensively, but why settle for mediocrity at qb. That's right, I said the "m" word. Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt316 Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Much to do about nothing here guys. This is what Pelini does. He says every position is an open competition so that the players that aren't "labeled" a projected starter keep that hunger and work hard and so that those that are "labeled" a projected starter don't get lazy. Heck last season he even said Suh's position wasn't completely secure going into fall camp. Just because he said their is an open competition at QB, doesn't really mean mean that it is really an open competition at QB. It does mean that no matter who is the starter coming out of fall camp, wether they already know who that is or not - if they get lazy or someone else proves they are more capable in practice and in study at some point during the season that the starting job could be taken away. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Much to do about nothing here guys. This is what Pelini does. He says every position is an open competition so that the players that aren't "labeled" a projected starter keep that hunger and work hard and so that those that are "labeled" a projected starter don't get lazy. Heck last season he even said Suh's position wasn't completely secure going into fall camp. Just because he said their is an open competition at QB, doesn't really mean mean that it is really an open competition at QB. It does mean that no matter who is the starter coming out of fall camp, wether they already know who that is or not - if they get lazy or someone else proves they are more capable in practice and in study at some point during the season that the starting job could be taken away. THis is true. A great motivational tool. Best way to put the top 22 players on the field. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.