Trayvon Martin and "Stand Your Ground" in FL

[Junior]

so then why did all the witnesses corrobate Zimmerman's story that the prosecutor put up there? As much as you claim i defend Zimmerman you defend Martin just as much.

 

Do share links.

[husker_99]

so then why did all the witnesses corrobate Zimmerman's story that the prosecutor put up there? As much as you claim i defend Zimmerman you defend Martin just as much.

 

Do share links.

Ok not all but most. http://www.buzzfeed.com/elliotfelig/how-the-prosecution-lost-the-zimmerman-case. None of the witnesses that did side the prosecutor did put up for Martin's defense weren't even believable and told lies.

[Junior]

so then why did all the witnesses corrobate Zimmerman's story that the prosecutor put up there? As much as you claim i defend Zimmerman you defend Martin just as much.

 

Do share links.

Ok not all but most. http://www.buzzfeed....-zimmerman-case. None of the witnesses that did side the prosecutor did put up for Martin's defense weren't even believable and told lies.

 

OK... but no one saw who approached who first. Right? Isn't that the crux of your argument? You keep saying that Martin approached Zimmerman while Zimmerman had retreated to his car, but we don't know that. And one witness says they saw what appeared to be Martin on top of Zimmerman and one witness said the opposite. So, why do you believe Zimmerman's story so intently?

 

http://freakoutnation.com/2013/06/28/witness-testimony-contradicts-george-zimmerman-placing-him-on-top-of-trayvon-martin/

[carlfense]

No. Since Zimmerman didn't know who it was or what he was doing he followed him. Then he was told that he didn't need to follow him and stopped.

STOP SAYING THAT.

you mean facts?

Facts like these?

He had a gun, he followed an unarmed teenager who had the nerve to be walking home in the rain, and he ended up killing the unarmed teenager.

please quit saying this.

[husker_99]

so then why did all the witnesses corrobate Zimmerman's story that the prosecutor put up there? As much as you claim i defend Zimmerman you defend Martin just as much.

 

Do share links.

Ok not all but most. http://www.buzzfeed....-zimmerman-case. None of the witnesses that did side the prosecutor did put up for Martin's defense weren't even believable and told lies.

 

OK... but no one saw who approached who first. Right? Isn't that the crux of your argument? You keep saying that Martin approached Zimmerman while Zimmerman had retreated to his car, but we don't know that. And one witness says they saw what appeared to be Martin on top of Zimmerman and one witness said the opposite. So, why do you believe Zimmerman's story so intently?

 

http://freakoutnatio...trayvon-martin/

first of all Zimmerman was sitting in his truck cause in the audio version you can hear him get out. The only reason Zimmerman got out was that Martin approached his truck cause he could describe him to the dispatcher. none of Martin's backers were even believable.

[husker_99]

 

He had a gun, he followed an unarmed teenager who had the nerve to be walking home in the rain, and he ended up killing the unarmed teenager.

please quit saying this.

so you know when someone has a gun or not on their person by just looking at them?

[Junior]

so then why did all the witnesses corrobate Zimmerman's story that the prosecutor put up there? As much as you claim i defend Zimmerman you defend Martin just as much.

 

Do share links.

Ok not all but most. http://www.buzzfeed....-zimmerman-case. None of the witnesses that did side the prosecutor did put up for Martin's defense weren't even believable and told lies.

 

OK... but no one saw who approached who first. Right? Isn't that the crux of your argument? You keep saying that Martin approached Zimmerman while Zimmerman had retreated to his car, but we don't know that. And one witness says they saw what appeared to be Martin on top of Zimmerman and one witness said the opposite. So, why do you believe Zimmerman's story so intently?

 

http://freakoutnatio...trayvon-martin/

first of all Zimmerman was sitting in his truck cause in the audio version you can hear him get out. The only reason Zimmerman got out was that Martin approached his truck cause he could describe him to the dispatcher. none of Martin's backers were even believable.

 

No... Zimmerman got out to follow Martin. Dispatch "Are you following him?" Zimmerman "Yeah".

[carlfense]

so you know when someone has a gun or not on their person by just looking at them?

Quote where I said that.

[husker_99]

so you know when someone has a gun or not on their person by just looking at them?

Quote where I said that.

You didn't but implied it since we only knew after the fact that Martin didn't have a weapon on him.

[husker_99]

 

 

 

No... Zimmerman got out to follow Martin. Dispatch "Are you following him?" Zimmerman "Yeah".

I know. I even said Zimmerman did follow Martin but stopped.

[carlfense]

so you know when someone has a gun or not on their person by just looking at them?

Quote where I said that.

You didn't but implied it since we only knew after the fact that Martin didn't have a weapon on him.

You're saying that we should assume that everyone has a weapon on them until we kill them and discover that they're unarmed?

[husker_99]

so you know when someone has a gun or not on their person by just looking at them?

Quote where I said that.

You didn't but implied it since we only knew after the fact that Martin didn't have a weapon on him.

You're saying that we should assume that everyone has a weapon on them until we kill them and discover that they're unarmed?

No. But you don't know if someone is armed or not unless they show you they are. Just because you knew after the fact they weren't armed has no bearing on what happened and should not dictate the outcome.

[carlfense]

No. But you don't know if someone is armed or not unless they show you they are. Just because you knew after the fact they weren't armed has no bearing on what happened and should not dictate the outcome.

Uh huh.

 

So which part shouldn't we mention? That Zimmerman followed an unarmed teenager or that he followed and killed an unarmed teenager?

 

 

 

Those are facts, right? Apparently you haven't decided whether you want us to say facts or not. It seems to hinge on how they portray George Zimmerman.

[husker_99]

No. But you don't know if someone is armed or not unless they show you they are. Just because you knew after the fact they weren't armed has no bearing on what happened and should not dictate the outcome.

Uh huh.

 

So which part shouldn't we mention? That Zimmerman followed an unarmed teenager or that he followed and killed an unarmed teenager?

 

 

 

Those are facts, right? Apparently you haven't decided whether you want us to say facts or not. It seems to hinge on how they portray George Zimmerman.

Like i said Zimmerman didn't know he wasn't armed and couldn't have known. so quit bringing up after the fact facts.

[carlfense]

Like i said Zimmerman didn't know he wasn't armed and couldn't have known.

Why do you think that this is significant?

 

so quit bringing up after the fact facts.

Virtually everything that we know is "after the fact facts." Similarly, I could ask that you quit regurgitating the Gospel of Zimmerman because he might have some incentive to misrepresent events . . .