Maxconvert Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Not that this disaster was TMart's fault, but no successful program can continue to give away 2-3 turnovers a game to the other team and expect to be a top program. At this point I would be SHOCKED to see a game with no Martinez fumbles. I'm glad his passing mechanics have improved, but if he can't stop the incesssant fumbling then put him at WR and bring start the Armstrong Era. 2 Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Not that this disaster was TMart's fault, but no successful program can continue to give away 2-3 turnovers a game to the other team and expect to be a top program. At this point I would be SHOCKED to see a game with no Martinez fumbles. I'm glad his passing mechanics have improved, but if he can't stop the incesssant fumbling then put him at WR and bring start the Armstrong Era. Because we have a guarantee that Tommy is better at holding onto the football than Taylor. Quote Link to comment
2ndNnine Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 maybe you haven't seen kellogg play,,, but yeah, tommy better get lots of snaps next year. Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Brobeans, this is something like your 5th thread in an hour, chill. Relax. Take some time off. Drink some beer! It's great stuff! Also, you must've missed the run by Taylor in the first quarter. Do you guarantee Tommy can do that? Because you've seen sooooo much film on him? Quote Link to comment
huskerfan711 Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Not that this disaster was TMart's fault, but no successful program can continue to give away 2-3 turnovers a game to the other team and expect to be a top program. At this point I would be SHOCKED to see a game with no Martinez fumbles. I'm glad his passing mechanics have improved, but if he can't stop the incesssant fumbling then put him at WR and bring start the Armstrong Era. Because we have a guarantee that Tommy is better at holding onto the football than Taylor. Not a guarantee... but it's pretty pathetic that Taylor has led the FBS in fumbles for all three years he's played... Taylor is amazing, but this is beyond insane. He's gotta get a handle on keeping the football 1 Quote Link to comment
beanman Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Not that this disaster was TMart's fault, but no successful program can continue to give away 2-3 turnovers a game to the other team and expect to be a top program. At this point I would be SHOCKED to see a game with no Martinez fumbles. I'm glad his passing mechanics have improved, but if he can't stop the incesssant fumbling then put him at WR and bring start the Armstrong Era. Because we have a guarantee that Tommy is better at holding onto the football than Taylor. We've got pretty good odds that he's not going to lead FBS in fumbles every year he plays. Quote Link to comment
Klondike Cat Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 And stupid passes. He rolled out of the pocket and nothing was there, but he didn't have the common sense to throw it out of bounds. Instead, he threw it right into obvious coverage for a pick. I couldn't believe he would make such a dumb choice after he's had time to develop. If the play's not there, throw it away. Even taking the sack would have been better. Quote Link to comment
beanman Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 All one can hope is, Taylor doesn't reproduce. Because it would break my heart to see him drop a baby on its head. 3 Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Op. I cannot find a way to disagree with this. But... Armstrong has to earn the spot. It will be open competition in spring and fall again. It's safe to say that Armstrong redshirting was pretty much a given. Talking to guys in the know, the spring and fall compeitition may be much closer than we'll ever know. Quote Link to comment
CheeseHusker Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 I was yelling at Pelini to bench him. It isn't that Taylor isn't any good. The problem is, he was rattled beyond belief. You've got to get him off the field for a series and tell him to get his sh--t together. We fumble, and we continue to fumble, because there's no accountability for doing it. This is the telling thing for me. Nebraska gets 20 points down, 30 points down, 40 points down, and they change nothing. They run the same offensive plays, they use the same personnel, they use the same schemes. Nebraska didn't try anything different at all. Really, how about getting your backup QB some snaps anyway. You are five touchdowns down, what the hell's the difference? Quote Link to comment
Maxconvert Posted December 2, 2012 Author Share Posted December 2, 2012 Not that this disaster was TMart's fault, but no successful program can continue to give away 2-3 turnovers a game to the other team and expect to be a top program. At this point I would be SHOCKED to see a game with no Martinez fumbles. I'm glad his passing mechanics have improved, but if he can't stop the incesssant fumbling then put him at WR and bring start the Armstrong Era. Because we have a guarantee that Tommy is better at holding onto the football than Taylor. Guarantee?? How about the odds that not a single player in the country fumbles more than Tmart for three years in a row? Yeah I'd take the "chance" that armstrong falls into the category of...everyone other than TMart...in his ability to hold on to the ball. 2 Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 I was yelling at Pelini to bench him. It isn't that Taylor isn't any good. The problem is, he was rattled beyond belief. Yeah.......benching a quarterback helps reassure him and get rid of the rattled play. Some of the stuff you guys are coming up with tonight >>>>> Quote Link to comment
Maxconvert Posted December 2, 2012 Author Share Posted December 2, 2012 This is the telling thing for me. Nebraska gets 20 points down, 30 points down, 40 points down, and they change nothing. They run the same offensive plays, they use the same personnel, they use the same schemes. Nebraska didn't try anything different at all. Yes that was a sight to behold--we're down by several light-years, and we come out with an offense that looks like it's trying to burn the clock Quote Link to comment
Klondike Cat Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 And they run the same defense that gets burned over and over on the outside. It was ugly. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Not that this disaster was TMart's fault, but no successful program can continue to give away 2-3 turnovers a game to the other team and expect to be a top program. At this point I would be SHOCKED to see a game with no Martinez fumbles. I'm glad his passing mechanics have improved, but if he can't stop the incesssant fumbling then put him at WR and bring start the Armstrong Era. Because we have a guarantee that Tommy is better at holding onto the football than Taylor. Guarantee?? How about the odds that not a single player in the country fumbles more than Tmart for three years in a row? Yeah I'd take the "chance" that armstrong falls into the category of...everyone other than TMart...in his ability to hold on to the ball. I didn't think it was actually necessary, but lets say Tommy fumbles less. Let's say he fumbles a lot less. Do we also have a guarantee that he can throw the ball as well, run the ball as well, rally the team as a leader, play from behind and make as good of or better decisions? Because if not (and the answer is no, there is no guarantee), then statements like "Taylor needs to sit on the bench if x or y" without any thought as to who would play instead of him are unwarranted and baseless. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.