sd'sker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Pelini has not lost "at least" 4 games per season. He has lost "no more than" 4 games per season. Beg to differ all you like.....it's incorrect. this season is not over. but regardless, losing 4 games a season is still losing at least 4 games. so, say it however you want, it is at least 4 games as much as it is no more than 4 games. Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Wtf? Both statements are correct. And quite the feat to accomplish six years running. If hadn't been for Minnesota and Iowa, the streak could have easily been broken. Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Wtf? Both statements are correct. i know. he has lost 4 game a year. so 'no more than 4' is equally accurate as 'at least 4'. really odd argument to make. and if your defense of bo hinges on a semantically nuance of the english language, well i do not even know what to say. 2 Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 I stand corrected. Technically at least 4 is correct since we have one more game to play. Only if we win our bowl game would no more than 4 be correct. Thanks to sdsker for setting me straight. +1 Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 In one year, we lost to three conference opponents we had never lost to since joining the conference. Quote Link to comment
TheSker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 and if your defense of bo hinges on a semantically nuance of the english language, well i do not even know what to say. My defense of Pelini doesn't matter. Eichorst's matters. I choose not to bash our head coach who wants to win every bit as bad as I do. Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Wtf? Both statements are correct. i know. he has lost 4 game a year. so 'no more than 4' is equally accurate as 'at least 4'. really odd argument to make. and if your defense of bo hinges on a semantically nuance of the english language, well i do not even know what to say. You have to consider the other issues with which a Bo supporter might hinge their support. Then it makes more sense. Quote Link to comment
1 nu rugby Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 So we agree he has a 4 L minimum going forward? At least we were able to move Tennessee back a decade, hope the replacement team.......oops Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 In one year, we lost to three conference opponents we had never lost to since joining the conference. Thanks for pointing that out. I'm trying to get in a better mood here and I really had not realized that.....until now. Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 In one year, we lost to three conference opponents we had never lost to since joining the conference. Thanks for pointing that out. I'm trying to get in a better mood here and I really had not realized that.....until now. Just accept it as "getting them out of the way." Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 and if your defense of bo hinges on a semantically nuance of the english language, well i do not even know what to say. My defense of Pelini doesn't matter. Eichorst's matters. I choose not to bash our head coach who wants to win every bit as bad as I do. i choose to discuss the strengths and deficiencies of our head coach to draw a conclusion. that conclusion is that, given the evidence, we have no reason to expect a different result than we have seen the last 6 years. i do not even know what to say about not bashing a coach who wants to win as badly as you do. i mean, what coach does not want to win? that is a prerequisite to being a coach. so i do not care that he wants to win, i care about what he does to win. 4 Quote Link to comment
Ziebol Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 and if your defense of bo hinges on a semantically nuance of the english language, well i do not even know what to say. My defense of Pelini doesn't matter. Eichorst's matters. I choose not to bash our head coach who wants to win every bit as bad as I do. i choose to discuss the strengths and deficiencies of our head coach to draw a conclusion. that conclusion is that, given the evidence, we have no reason to expect a different result than we have seen the last 6 years. i do not even know what to say about not bashing a coach who wants to win as badly as you do. i mean, what coach does not want to win? that is a prerequisite to being a coach. so i do not care that he wants to win, i care about what he does to win. Nail on the head sir. He can be as passionate as he wants about winning, but until he shows that he CAN win we can keep expecting the same results. And you can argue that we have won plenty of games under of Bo, but which have been of any significance? Quote Link to comment
TheSker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 i choose to discuss the strengths and deficiencies of our head coach The deficiencies were not missed Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 i choose to discuss the strengths and deficiencies of our head coach The deficiencies were not missed and the strengths are hard to find. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.