NUance Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Should airlines charge more for fat people? It seems fair. It takes more jet fuel, seating space, etc. to haul all that extra weight. The average weights in the U.S. are 196 lb and 166 lbs (men/women LINK). Should airline passengers have to pay a premium for the extra pounds they carry? Say, 0.5% of the base ticket price for every pound over average? I'm about 15 lbs over, so I'd pay an extra $30 bucks on a $400 airline ticket. What if some of the fat-surcharge went to partially compensate a skinny person sitting adjacent (if any)? Would it be fair then? Quote Link to comment
rawhide Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Looks like it's drivin' time for me choppahs never complain 1 Quote Link to comment
The King Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Yes, they should. Because my flight experience sucks when all their lard is over in my seat. 1 Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 There was a recent article about them shrinking the size of the airplane seats. I don't think you can go by weight alone. I'm about 230 but I fit in the seats just fine because I don't have a huge ass or super wide body. Quote Link to comment
husker B-rent Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Silly idea, sorry. I'm narrow and take up less space than most but I also weigh 230 lbs. Helping at a local gym afte my 14 hhours a day job will do that to you. Now going by ass and shoulder width, sure! Quote Link to comment
Cina Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 They have those boxes in the airport that your carry-on has to fit into to go on the plane, so let's use the same principle. Narrow the metal detector to a set width and if you touch the edges when you walk through (like in that game operation) it buzzes and they charge you extra. Quote Link to comment
The King Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 It should be the obese tax Obviously a sliding scale based on height:weight Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 They should also charge you more if you decide to bring your unruly children on the plane and have no interest in keeping them in line Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted December 17, 2013 Author Share Posted December 17, 2013 They should also charge you more if you decide to bring your unruly children on the plane and have no interest in keeping them in line But presumably the kids would be reimbursed for being a smaller size/weight, offsetting the unruly kid charge. Quote Link to comment
Foppa Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 I can go both ways on my opinion, basically just because of my one experience. I was flying from Atlanta to Madrid, so it was a long flight. The airline was a 2-5-2 seat config, and I had a window seat. The guy next to me probably weighed at least 400 lbs, I'd say more. About an hour into the flight, I needed to use the toilet. The guy was reading and when I asked to get out, he said "No." I asked why not, and he said "I'm busy and I'm comfortable." Other than trying to climb over this monstrosity, there was no way I was getting out. I called the flight attendant over and told her what was going on. He still refused to move and got into an argument with her. After a couple of minutes, it got resolved, and I got to spend the rest of the flight in 1st class. So it wasn't all bad Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 They should also charge you more if you decide to bring your unruly children on the plane and have no interest in keeping them in line But presumably the kids would be reimbursed for being a smaller size/weight, offsetting the unruly kid charge. Kids on airplanes should be drugged, muzzled, and put into the cargo area Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Anyone else concerned that the average woman's weight is tipping in at 166? By those numbers, I've dated a lot of below average women! Quote Link to comment
wiuhusker Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Anyone else concerned that the average woman's weight is tipping in at 166? By those numbers, I've dated a lot of below average women! Saw that too. Thought it was a little high but at the same time it really wouldn't be surprising either. Jus take a walk through Wal-Mart Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.