GOAT Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I swear, some of these suckers are like high schoolers (Matty Ice & C N Red, to be exact.) Get over it already. 1 Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I swear, some of these suckers are like high schoolers (Matty Ice & C N Red, to be exact.) Get over it already. There you go again. Are high schoolers not allowed to post here? 2 Quote Link to comment
GOAT Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 There you again: another lame attempt at humor; another miserable failure. 2 Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 There you again: another lame attempt at humor; another miserable failure. Dude, youre awesome. Be my friend, mr-awesome-comeback-man. Please? Seriously though, are we finishing 38th or 39th in recruiting on goat.com? 5 Quote Link to comment
Huskinator Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Can we please get back to recruiting. Things are looking great for this class to bounce back. Next year is looking awesome. Let's get back to the topic at hand. Who does everyone think is next. 1 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Can we please get back to recruiting. Things are looking great for this class to bounce back. Next year is looking awesome. Let's get back to the topic at hand. Who does everyone think is next. It's looking like Fitzpatrick on Monday. Quote Link to comment
Huskinator Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 That's my thoughts too. I think we don't get Allen. Do we make a run at one more prospect or just finish over signing 2 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 From what I've gathered, I'm pretty sure we would like to have another TE - Allen or someone they know of that they think they can snag quickly if we miss on Allen. Though I haven't even heard any names floated that could be a possibility. Other than that, I think we stick with Fitzpatrick and Jackson. Plus I think Weber gets a scholarship to fill us up. Quote Link to comment
Huskinator Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 What are your feelings on Simmons mav Quote Link to comment
Huskinator Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I don't like that answer. Pick another Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Yeah, that really sucks for us. I think we kept after him for some time and were in a good spot. But getting a late offer from a team that played for the National Championship a couple weeks ago is probably too much to overcome. I'd love to be wrong. But we were recruiting him at Safety for a long time until he decided he wanted to play WR so we told him he could play WR. But then Clemson (and Michigan) come in and want him at Safety so now he's back to saying he doesn't care which side of the ball he plays on. Maybe he got some sort of "we want you at Safety but we'll give you a look at WR" type of thing. And he definitely couldn't turn down any chance to play WR at Clemson. Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 From what I've gathered, I'm pretty sure we would like to have another TE - Allen or someone they know of that they think they can snag quickly if we miss on Allen. Though I haven't even heard any names floated that could be a possibility. Other than that, I think we stick with Fitzpatrick and Jackson. Plus I think Weber gets a scholarship to fill us up. No Simmons? Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Yeah, that really sucks for us. I think we kept after him for some time and were in a good spot. But getting a late offer from a team that played for the National Championship a couple weeks ago is probably too much to overcome. I'd love to be wrong. But we were recruiting him at Safety for a long time until he decided he wanted to play WR so we told him he could play WR. But then Clemson (and Michigan) come in and want him at Safety so now he's back to saying he doesn't care which side of the ball he plays on. Maybe he got some sort of "we want you at Safety but we'll give you a look at WR" type of thing. And he definitely couldn't turn down any chance to play WR at Clemson. I understand where you are coming from. But, I think location is a bigger factor with him than some think. Quote Link to comment
Huskinator Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I agree with mav. The proof is in the pudding here Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.