C N Red Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 It's made me puke when the 4 letter network said there was a block innthe back on AAs reception. The guy that got blocked fell on his back which means he was blocked in the front idiots. Was it close? Yes. But his back hit the ground. It was a clean block you f'ing douches!!! Quote Link to comment
Abdullah the Butcher Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Eh it was questionable, looks like it's from behind to me. Quote Link to comment
beanman Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Eh it was questionable, looks like it's from behind to me. That can't be true. It's just because ESPN hates us. Quote Link to comment
Bigred_inSD Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 With a play like that there is always going to be a questionable block or hold. But, on 90% of plays there is probably a hold by the offensive line that goes ignored 1 Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 It was not in the back it was the side. :39-:42 mark on #20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e3KNGH9YWo Quote Link to comment
C N Red Posted September 8, 2014 Author Share Posted September 8, 2014 Does he fall on his hack or his stomach? Im a referee and how the guy falls is a huge issue as whether its a block in the back or not. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Does he fall on his hack or his stomach? Im a referee and how the guy falls is a huge issue as whether its a block in the back or not. He got hit on his right side, landed on his left side and then rolled over to his back. At worst, the block was half to his side and half to his back and it would rarely ever get called. Anyone saying this should have been penalized is just nitpicking after watching the play 10 times (because it's awesome). 1 Quote Link to comment
beanman Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 It's a close call. I watched 10 times and could go either way. I just get annoyed about all the ESPN hates us crap. 3 Quote Link to comment
tschu Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Quote Link to comment
NebraskaShellback Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 It was not in the back it was the side. :39-:42 mark on #20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e3KNGH9YWo I do not see it either. Mostly on the side block. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 The way things were going for us, I thought the play was going to get called back when I saw it. Quote Link to comment
HuskerfaninOkieland Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 The way things were going for us, I thought the play was going to get called back when I saw it. I was expecting a holding call, or a tripping call, or a paddy-cake call. Fortunately, none of those happened. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 They made up for the clip call in ' 93 Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 They made up for the clip call in ' 93 I was going to argue at how silly this is but then I remembered how we would never have lived this game down if we'd lost. As it is now, people probably won't remember it two weeks from now Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.