Question for Husker fans...

[TrueMizzou]

If the sideline and off-the-field issues had been absent, would you have been okay with Bo keeping his job based on the team's performance?

 

Conversely, if Bo was contending for conference and national titles, would those issues have mattered to you?

 

Good luck in your search... I and a lot of other Missouri/Big-8 fans will be watching with keen interest.

 

I wouldn't mind seeing Nebraska wreck the Big-10. I like the people and I like your state.

 

TrueMizzou

[Street Novelist]

We win 9 games a year with nothing to show for it. Plain and simple.

[Eric the Red]

If the sideline and off-the-field issues had been absent, would you have been okay with Bo keeping his job based on the team's performance?

 

Conversely, if Bo was contending for conference and national titles, would those issues have mattered to you?

 

Good luck in your search... I and a lot of other Missouri/Big-8 fans will be watching with keen interest.

 

I wouldn't mind seeing Nebraska wreck the Big-10. I like the people and I like your state.

 

TrueMizzou

 

 

Boy that's a tough question....great question.

 

I think after listening to Eichorst, he would still be out because it was a complete decision........and as fans we would simply be focused on the blowout loses.

[Landlord]

I didn't like the relationship with Bo's program, but I would have put up with it for better success.

 

If Bo was more of a saint but not any better on the field, it wouldn't make any difference to me.

[AngryHusker88]

I don't care about the sideline behavior. Nebraska got humiliated almost every time we played a top 25 team these past few years.

[HuskerfaninOkieland]

Bo's antic's would have been tolerated more, even overlooked, had his production on the field been better.

[GM_Tood]

#0Championships

[AngryHusker88]

I would be a a bit unhappy but accepting had Nebraska at least put up a competitive showing in MOST of those games

[Dbqgolfer]

For me, it's the blowout losses.

[BigRedBuster]

Simple, I believe if he doesn't melt down on the sidelines so much in big games he would be a better leader/game coach and the in field results would have been better.

 

So they go hand in hand.

[AngryHusker88]

The nepotism was intolerable. Tim Beck should have been fired after 2013 (should have never been hired as OC IMO). But he was retained because him & Bo are buddies.

 

Tommy Armstrong should gave been pulled at some point against Wisconsin but wasn't...because once Bo decides on a starting QB...open competition at that position, it seems, gets flushed down the toilet regardless of on the field performance

[74Hunter]

Bo's antic's would have been tolerated more, even overlooked, had his production on the field been better.

Which, imo, is pretty hypocritical.

[ColoradoHusk]

I wasn't concerned about Bo's antics on the sideline. It's the type of coach he is. I was concerned about the lack of progress the past few years and lack of big time wins.

[lo country]

Blowout losses. That and the inability to hire a competent staff to help him as he learned on the job....

[Bowfin]

I have ZERO investment in this team, so I really don't feel my thoughts or feelings should be taken into account. Husker football is a take it or leave it proposition to me.

 

I DO have opinions on Nebraska's team, but they matter as much as my opinions on what the weather will do. No one owes me anything because I bought a T-shirt from the Salvation Army.