Trump's 7 point Drain the Swamp Plan & 100 Day Agenda

[Archy1221]

1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

And, would you support those?

Support what?

[knapplc]

trump's "blind trust" was basically forced on him by howls from ethics watchdogs who were horrified by his 2016 claims that he wouldn't utilize such a shield between himself and his business ventures.

 

So he created a trust that met the thinnest of bare definitions of a blind trust, but put his son & a business partner in charge. The "trust" allowed trump to access any of the money at any time, providing zero layers of separation from trump & his holdings.

 

 

[BigRedBuster]

2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Support what?

That's what I thought.

[Archy1221]

9 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

That's what I thought.

Why be like that??  You didn’t answer my clarification question so how the hell am I supposed to answer?  Charges or blind trusts. What are you asking about.  

[BigRedBuster]

Just now, Archy1221 said:

Why be like that??  You didn’t answer my clarification question so how the hell am I supposed to answer?  Charges or blind trusts. What are you asking about.  

How do you support blind trusts?  Obviously my question was about the charges.

[Archy1221]

2 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

How do you support blind trusts?  Obviously my question was about the charges.

Support the idea of it being legal to put investments in a blind trust while serving instead of divesting. That could have been your question.  
 

now that I finally know your question, I am on the side that says people should not have to divest holdings just to hold public office.  It’s unfair to the office holder and unfair to other stakeholders of those holdings.  Decision making control is a different story though and arraignments should be made  

 

If It’s suspected Kushners have broken laws then charge them.  Doesn’t sound too hard. 

[knapplc]

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

arraignments should be made

 

Regarding trump? I couldn't agree more.