MyBloodIsRed16

notice how each team is failing but Iowa is still at the bottom of the list.

I think I might have preferred the old fashion way of getting backups playing time by destroying teams in the first 3 quarters. But I agree these injuries may be a blessing in disguise

say we win out and make it to the conference championship game and by some miracle they beat whoever represents the East. Does a 3 loss Nebraska team get into the playoff?

Didn't Sims complete a screen pass in the first game? Teams with bad o-lines should runs screens at least a couple times a game. I used to tell the kids I coached just block like you normally do (badly) but when you let the guy by you run over there and stand in a group.

Numbers 4 and 5 for Purdue are pretty good

I think I learned the light has come on for Tommie Hill. He has 3 INTs in 2 games. I also learned Purdues TE was one of our best players.

13 on the sideline after getting beat on an out and up and 12 running down a RB who got loose

Fire Garret McGuire right! Right guys? And Raiola. Right after the game. Right!?

Did he catch a ride on the truck?

I mean I would like to have him but seriously, the RBs we already have would look a much better with a line that could open a hole. Also there would be more explosive plays from our RBs if HH was willing to pitch the ball in the option

I am from Indiana. My Dad's uncle played on IU's first national championship basket ball team so we always rooted for IU basketball which led to hatred for PU. I have two sisters who ended up going there and had to deal with the lame dudes they dated. It also seemed like the guys I didn't get along with the most from other teams in HS ended up going to Purdue (not to play). I've probably seen more Purdue games in person than I have Nebraska games. Purdue just sucks and I hate them. Their campus sucks too.

I probably hate Purdue more than any other big ten team. I don't care what the score is I just need a win.

Rb is the least of my worries for the future teams. How many Rbs can you say they were good in spite of their offensive line and not because of it? We need OL and then will get the RBs

yeah when he flips to Alabama they are gonna go after whichever one of their RBs hits the portal.

Get a colostomy bag, fill it with beer and hang it at your hip. Nobody's gonna say a thing

Tommie looks like he's been stealing Johnny's and Tom's food when he visits them at the old folks home

I like the fact Purdue has pronunciations for the players names. The announcers for the NW game could have used that for our guys

Does Michigan have natural grass? I remember is HS I had a stable of very fast RBs. We would show up to other venues and the grass on the field would be about 8" tall and the sideline would be wet and muddy without it having rained. I could see Jim Harbough pulling s#!t like that

They also sign better QBs. Maybe we should try that.

if they win this next game we will know Trev hired the right guy. That's a big ask of a coach to have 80% of his offensive starters go down in one season. Even if Purdue is bad that's tough to go out with 3 new starters across the o-line and basically new starters at all WR positions.

one of the biggest problems most of the QBs in recent history had with their mechanics was their footwork. A lot of inaccuracy comes from foot position at the time of the throw. How many times have we seen our qbs throwing off their back foot or with their feet parallel. Granted the lines have been bad and its a miracle sometime that qbs can get the ball off. But its happened plenty when they have had time to throw.

what if they just switched the legacy ticket holders seats to the other side (if they want to be behind the team).

that's 72% of the starting offense. 81% if you cross off Sims.

who wants to bet there will be natural grass in the stadium next year?

I guess we'll see how the fire Raiola crowd feels after we see the performances of the back ups. Pipers back up looked good.