I think that's what i've been saying all along, was that he COULD have been charged. Obviously it happened at some point, or else the precedent wouldn't be there.
Not wrong, I posted the law, and pointed out that Suh could have been charged under the law. Other people are posting opinions.
Here's the Zero Tolerance thing, do you guys seriously not know how to use Google?
From back in 2008, Suh probably violated the policy, Pelini will handle it internally as always, life will move on. If it were Christiansen or Niles Paul, I would highly doubt that they would play the rest of the year after their earlier violations.
http://www.ketv.com/bigredzone/15566877/detail.html
Pelini said. "I talked with the entire team last night and clearly explained to them that from this point forward, we will have a zero-tolerance policy regarding alcohol and social responsibility. Our players understand the intent of this rule and what we are trying to accomplish. Therefore, any violation will be handled individually as it pertains to the specific circumstance.
"Our players also understand that certain establishments are off limits, and that the policy also pertains to their behavior in other social settings. I made it clear to them that our policy will be strictly enforced.
"Coach Osborne, myself, and our staff are all in agreement that the culture of this program will be one centered on respect, integrity and discipline. We all agree that culture must extend well beyond the football field."
Exactly, Zero tolereance is zero tolerance, this is a football team rule, not the law that we are talking about.
Suh broke a team rule, like it or not. There has to be some sort of peanalty, or you have to lose respect for Pellini. Would benching him the first quarter of the OU game be severe enough or not? It sucks, but rules are rules.