Jump to content


Jason Sitoke

Members
  • Posts

    4,210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Jason Sitoke last won the day on October 21 2022

Jason Sitoke had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

35,024 profile views

Jason Sitoke's Achievements

Starter

Starter (10/21)

3.8k

Reputation

  1. Raiola is scared s#!tless to unload the ball. Not good
  2. Pretty uninspiring offense. Our punter has thrown the best pass of the half.
  3. They’re a good team. But this game wasn’t as close as the score would indicate. Outrushed them 241-39. Illinois is well coached though and came up with a couple big plays to stop Penn st drives. Gave themselves a chance.
  4. They’ve hung around, but Penn St has absolutely owned the LoS pretty much all game.
  5. Would. Penn St looks better on both LoS than we did against Illinois. So don’t see it happening
  6. I learned we won and nothing more. My stream broke.
  7. Mostly (as I understand it) has to do with catching while going to the ground, whether it’s in the end zone, on the sideline, or in the middle of the field: ‘If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent) he must maintain complete and continuous control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or in the end zone. This is also required for a player attempting to make a catch at the sideline and going to the ground out of bounds. If he loses control of the ball which then touches the ground before he regains control, it is not a catch. If he regains control inbounds prior to the ball touching the ground it is a catch.’ What I saw was our guy begin the process of the catch, but didn’t complete it. As they were going to the ground, the defender gained possession and maintained possession. it could be argued that to overturn it you have to be sure the ball never contacted the ground, which I’m not sure there was a clear angle. Either way, I thought it was an interception in real time, and nothing about the replay changed my mind.
  8. I don’t really follow you on this. What ended up being unlikely was a Nebraska running play being successful. 7 rushing yards in the 2nd half
  9. It’s our job to entertain it. It’s how they cope. They take it out on us…Huskerboard domestic violence.
  10. I think the point is we can talk about bad calls and they do affect the game of course..but what is the logical conclusion of your argument? Is this a conference conspiracy against Nebraska? If you think so, say it and explain how it could be executed in secrecy for a decade, and more importantly why. I had a few problems with the refereeing last night. I thought the spot was terrible on the Illinois 4th down. I thought the offsides call was BS. I thought the defensive Pi against us on the 3rd down hitch route was bad and inconsistent with the non call in the end zone on our second drive. However, the calls I hear being debated, like the end zone INT, the personal foul after the 4th down play, the non call on the OT hit on Banks…all were correct in my opinion. Illinois had an argument on a few non calls as well that went our way. So there…we talked about it.
  11. I know we hate Bert, but the guy can coach. He molds an identity and his teams play hard, smart, and tough.
×
×
  • Create New...