HuskersGJ

Its easy to say things like this when you win but I will definately be rooting for UDub the rest of the season- espeicially against USC! Locker had a terrible day but we also knew we have potentially the best secondary in the country. This game put a serious dent in his Heisman chances but the guy is a player- he'll recover and learn from this. Gotta say, i love the Huskies coaches. its going to be a tough road but i think they'll have the program back in the top 25 eventually. Good Luck, Huskies! Go Big Red!!

I agree with you. The CU Rivalry was based off the, wanting too be as good as us. Iowa has been plenty good before us and at the same time. But doesn't have as many shinny trophies too show for it. Or as many all time wins... as CU. Team W/L/T Pct. Years Total Games Colorado 665/435/36 .585 117 1136 Iowa 580/512/39 .513 120 1131 First of all, I agree with you and understand what you mean about being good "at the same time". but I thought it was only fair to point out that, historically speaking, CU ranks just a little higher on the all time wins chart than Iowa. an example of team's "going overboard" when beating Nebraska: CU in 2001? a great, huge win for them to be sure! they went on to win the Big 12 championship, got their deserved rings but what did they put on them? the score vs Nebraska. IMO THAT is a perfect microcosm of how our "little" brothers in the Big 8 saw Nebraska in the 80s and 90s. To them, beating Nebraska was what winning national titles were to us. On the flip side, who is the team that we didn't consistantly beat in all those years? Oklahoma. and coincidentally who were Nebraska fans closest to in a friendly, "gentleman's" rivalry? obviously they didn't treat a win over Nebraska like they'd just won the MNC or something- although ironically the winner of that game truly did have a better shot at he real thing.

From Brian Rosenthal: http://huskerextra.com/sports/football/article_463d2db6-bdef-11df-90c1-001cc4c002e0.html That's a long way to travel knowing your team likely won't win. Wouldn't mind inviting Idaho back to Memorial Stadium on a future schedule. This is the Idaho team I can root for.

Washington is also not as good as they were in '97 or '92. Not saying they're bad, they just aren't as good as those teams. Still, I think there will be more enthusiasm going into this game. The team SHOULD NEVER take "lesser" teams like WKU/Idaho lightly, but I think that tends to happen even when you try to guard against it. UDub will have their full attention, especially being the first road game.

Been listening to this for a while too. Really good stuff all around, for the most part. I'm not a fan of Finebaum mainly b/c its SEC and NOTHING else, but then again his show never claims to be anything but college football radio "for the deep south". Bill King is fantastic, you can listen to his show here as well: http://rivalsradio.rivals.com/ He has talked quite a bit about the Huskers from time to time, mostly positive but cautious regarding the offense. I haven't been able to listen to Leech and Jack Arute on CFB Playbook but from the little i have been able to catch, this show sounds like it will be fun! Everyone knows Leech is worth a good sound byte or a hundred. He offers really interesting insight and is pretty blunt/honest, as one would expect. I caught the end of him talking about Nebraska the other day but I didn't realize it was Leech until later. He had very good things to say about the fans, Pelini, etc. I've tried to find an online replay of the show but no luck.

Used to go the the CU game every year it was in Boulder. The only problems we ever really had prior to the games was with the younger kids yelling vulgarities, etc. Though I've seen much worse from other teams' fans on YouTube. Walking down "main street" i never saw anything worse than some smart ass comments but usually meant in friendly bantor. Spent plenty of time at the beer garden and never had any problems there-- and the alcohol was flowing-a-plenty. Usually there were also plenty of tailgaters with a mix of red with black/gold together. Inside the stadium was a different story unfortunately, especially in the late'90s/2000s-- the usual crap you hear about. We've had things thrown at us. Had some young kids sitting with us in 2005 who were treated pretty bad. "adults" talking smack to a 12-yr old girl. that's some Buff pride, i guess. I hope Iowa fans have more respect for their program than to act like CU. I can't help but wonder if Iowa vs Nebraska will be something like NU/CU. There is a little history wtih Iowa but it does seem a little forced like CU. There was history with CU as well, that doesn't mean we ever warmed up to that "rivalry". Randomly thinking of negative and postive comparisons between Iowa & CU... Negative: As a Husker fan who lived in Colorado for most of my life, most people in Colorado don't care enough about CU so day to day as a Husker fan wasn't too difficult. I would venture to guess that there are far more Iowans that care about the Hawkeyes than Coloradoans care about the Buffs. more passion is good for a fan base but at the same time, a Husker fan in Iowa may actually have a tougher time than a Husker in CO. Positive: I just can't see Ferentz mounting a Nebraska-is-the-devil red-letter-game campaign like good ol' Bill McCartney did. The Iowa football program is certainly above that. Negative: For the few fans CU does have there is a severe infiority complex when it comes to NU. 1/2 national title vs 5 will do that i guess. I don't know too many Iowa fans but I hope that kind of thing doesn't reer is ugly head since Iowa apparenly has only one title in 1958. I predict this will be a HUGE rivalry.... for those fans living in Iowa and Nebraska. The rest of the national Huskers will see Iowa as another tough Big 10 opponent. Now Penn State on the other hand... that won't take much to truly earn the meaning of the word "rivalry"!

I'm going to *guess*, and that's all this is, Herbie may have dropped us b/c of the QB situation. and if that's the case, its fair IMO. At least at the very start of the season when polls change the most. We went from having a veteran returning at QB, always an apparent plus... to having a startless freshman. Now obviously TMart is equal to or better than Lee according to the coachs, but when so little is known this early in the season a veteran QB > Freshman.

I thought about that UCF game as well. Culpepper played great that day and I think it put him on the national radar against a good Blackshirt squad. Even on offense, the home crowd tried to boo Scott Frost off the field. I would also point to Pacific in 1995. It was a 49-7 win but despite the score the reaction to the game was "what went wrong?". they knew they only had to show up and they seemed to lacked intensity in that game. Its not an excuse. It happens even to the best teams but it Shouldn't. I'm confident they will hear about it from the coaches and it won't happen again. Maybe best for another topic but this brings up a general issue. I guess I don't mind playing 1 crap team in the "preseason" as a way to work out some kinks but this year is just bad. three low end teams (no disrespect to Idaho)? I know Nebraska can schedule anyone and have the fans show up no matter what, but Pederson took creampuffing to a new (KSU-like) level with the 2008-10 schedules. How do you prevent a lack of intensity when most of their early games are like that? Hopefully Idaho isn't a trap game. It makes it harder to "FINISH" when you might lose interest by halftime each week.

Another satellite radio note-- I turned to channel 122 (Sirius) on Friday to hear any college football talk/news and heard Bo Pelini being interviewed. I figured it was a national show, 5 minute interview but it was the Nebraska Sports Network coaches show-- in full from what i could tell. They even played the local commercials so I got to hear about increasing yields and soy beans, too. Did they have Pelini on last year? http://www.sirius.com/siriusxmsportsnation Satellite Radio =

During a game hes a big meanie, picking on a poor qb,lb,ol,dl.db.rb,wr,coaches,fans,reporters,oh Zebras did I miss anybody. cheerleaders and band members? oh, and the AD.

I love the retro Herbie logo! I still have a hat (from when it wasn't "retro") but have been looking for a shirt with the ol' logo. I guess they must be popular b/c everytime I come across one I want, its only available in S or XL+ If we're talking about the outfits and not the actual logo: 1990s Herbie looked MUCH better with the "94" or "95" football uni on but this was the only picture I could find. I always think of this one celebrating with Dwayne Harris after the safety in the '94 Orange Bowl. And for the record, he was pretty "beefed up", too. Then they ($Bill Byrne?) replaced it with this. If you are going to keep the same concept, why change it at all? He lost the beefed up arms and looked like a lypo-suction Herbie-- he lost weight but still had his fat clothes. Not to mention the expression went from I'm-going-to-kick-your-ass-and-enjoy-it to a clown. Which oddly enough fits what happened to the team in 2002 but that's another story. I would love the '90s Herbie but if you don't like the current dark-haried outfit, keep in mind we still have this guy in the stands: http://www.reallifeherbiehusker.com/pics/slides/herbietitze2.JPG

Choice for Nebraska: A program in a state with a population of less than 2M being left to the whims of others and possibly ending up in a conference with KSU, ISU, Kansas and Baylor-- after the Texas Six (Pac 10) and Missouri (Big 10) leave. Or Force our own destiny and head to the Big Ten and all that it brings. etc, etc, etc. If the above translates to it being "about money", then i guess, damn straight was about money. Moving to a mansion vs being left at the doorstep of a homeless shelter? Yeah, I guess a choice like that does involve money. Its incredibly simple minded to think the choice was just money vs more money. If that was really, truly all this was based on then frankly it wouldn't have been worth it to Nebraska or the Big 10 to make the move. And that isn't even touching on the important issue of how much better we fit culturally amongst our new partners. Simple mindedness at play here. As others have said, he's just pissed because NW has been shoved down yet another rung on the conference totum poll.

Assuming the "story in itself" were true. Neither Stoops or Brown make very good Nebraska coaches IMO. At NU, Mack absolutely does not get the superior talent he has at his finger tips in Texas. I will give him credit for managing that talent (which isn't always easy), but at Nebraska I don't think he wins without the fertile recruiting ground. Same with Stoops, I don't know that he would have done well here either. He did a great job saving the sinking ship that was OU at the time and did it with Blake's recruits. Nebraska wasn't nearly as stocked in 2003/04 as OU was when Stoops came aboard. I don't know who would have been a good coach to continue after Osborne. but anyway we seem to have found our guy now. Whatever trials we had to go through to get to this point.

Motorboat - good list- Thank You! one point you made in particular Intersting you would bring that up, i hadn't heard that before. It reminds of things that were said about Solich with recruiting. I remember reading an article from the Denver Post about a prominant CU player (I'm sorry I forget who) who wanted to go to the Huskers but said Solich didn't even know his name and there was this attitude like "We're big bad Nebraska, who are you again?" Martin Rucker said similar things, as Mike's brother that guy should have been an easy recruit. Instead he helped Missouri kick our ass a couple times. In retrospect Callahan was obviously not the right hire. but we could have done MUCH worse considering how many people were saying thanks but no thanks to SP. SP had gotten desperate enough to go after Houston Nutt! Complain about BC not knowin the "Nebraska Way" all you want but Nutt would have been our RichRod, NCAA sanctions and all. We have had some low points to humble us the last few years but just the rumors that Nebraska was looking at Nutt... at the time Callahan seemed like a lucky break compared to that douche.

He and just about every other sports reporter outside of Nebraska have been saying that. You mean every sports writer outside of Nebraska but still inside Big 12 territories? because most of the national media and the local types outside of that region certainly haven't been putting it that way. at least not from what I've come across. Let Kansas/Oklahoma/Texas/Missouri choose whatever version makes them happy. Mark May included. whatever his bias may or may not be, he's a douche. We've known this for a while. I know "the media hates us" has been a mantra of ours but that apparent Husker hating non-Big 12 media has been putting the Huskers in the top 10 and in national title talk. That's higher than many Husker fans have been willing to put the team without getting slapped with a few of these:

I remember watching him play in a Colorado HS basketball championship game on Altitude TV after he'd committed to us. Looked like a man among boys on the court and just a mean, Ugly SOB. I've loved him ever since! We have a knack for putting DLinemen in the NFL-- Pierre will certainly be among them eventually.

I'm not a fan of the move, but if they have enough of the Big Ten AD's agreeing with it, then I'd consider that it can't be too bad of a plan, whatever they have in mind. What are the chances that these rumors are deliberately being put out there to test the waters so-to-speak?. To gauge reaction. Generally speaking, from national & local writers and radio shows to pundits to blogs and message board fans, the reaction seems to be leaning to the negative.

you said you had gotten into the NFL, too? What team(s) are you interested in and why? A team is something you get passionate about. A favorite team chooses you more than you choose a team, right? Watch some videos from all the team's you're down to and see if any of them really grab you. Maybe even wait and watch whatever games you can this season and see if any of them really take hold. Obviously I'd love for you to pick the Huskers(!) but this is not a decision to be forced!

Its funny but personally I think Colorado Pac-12 Champs 2012 would be even more amusing.

Update for anyone from the Grand Junction area on Huskerboard or anyone who might run across this post during the season or through a Google search. The Double Tree on Horizon Drive has agreed to show Huskers games this year in the lounge. Its a nice atmosphere and it would be great for local Husker fans in the area finally have a Big Red watch site that's a bit closer than Denver! http://doubletree1.hilton.com/en_US/dt/hotel/GJTDTDT-Doubletree-Hotel-Grand-Junction-Colorado/ PM me if you have questions GBR!

Actually LP, Clinton Childs, and Damon Benning were all ahead of Green. Green did get some PT early in the season during blowouts, which was fortunate because LP got suspended and then first Childs and then Benning were injured. That being said, Chase Rome is in a different position. I'd like to see him redshirt unless he's ubergood or injuries happen. You got me there on the Ahman Green situation. lol But I think you can see what I am saying. Jay Sims wasn't too shabby either. '95 had a whole stable of RBs and iirc, after LP was gone, all the backs that year were from Omaha. As for Rome, I think good arguments can be made for both sides. I'm going to take the easy way on the argument and just say that I trust the coaches, whatever decision they make. Then in 4 or 5 years we can all look back and 2nd guess it with our 20/20 hindsight.

I'm assuming Bo thinks the kid can keep clean or he wouldn't waste his time. We're not exactly stacked at TE but we're also not so desperate that we'd take someone who could potentially be a bad influence on the team. He may have wore out his welcome with UW and good for them for kicking him off the team for violating rules. he has a 2nd chance in a new place and hopefully he'll make the most of it as he will no doubt be on a very short leash. I really hope that's not his motivation. I'm an outsider making a lot of assumptions about his situation but if it was something as straight forward as failing a drug test for MJ, then that is his fault. not any mistreatment from UW that deserves some kind of payback. if that is the case he would need to realize his own mistakes instead of blaming others or he won't last long with Bo either. As for on the field. I'm really excited about his size in the videos, especially considering what Wats was able to do with TE's at CU. although its nice that he was 4* 5* in HS, that doesn't mean a whole lot now. Can he keep clean? can he learn the offense? Can he contribute? Lets see what he can do in the Big 10 in '11! Welcome to Nebraska, Kavario!

Wiegert, Schlesinger and Minter for sure. Williams, Stai, Colman and Graham played for years, probably not 10 years. Erstad, oops, wrong sport. What's that really got to do with college football? Ask anybody, ANYBODY who knows college football, who was the better college QB, Frazier or Collins, and they will all say Frazier. Everyone knew that Frazier wasn't even the best chance for an NFL QB on the team. Who knows, Berringer might have been our 4th to go 10 years in the NFL. I'm sorry but when comparing teams, IMO the NFL excuse is an admittance that the argument has been lost when you have to go that far off base. Miami 2001 people LOVE this argument, which is why i'm sick of it. Where do I begin? How many NFL teams had a comparable offense to what Nebraska was running in the '90s? We had WR's that were great for the type of offense NU ran but certainly would never have fit in anywhere in an NFL offense. According to this argument, a player like Tommie Frazier has ZERO value. That alone shows what a fallacy it is. Husker offensive lineman Aaron Taylor's size didn't fit in the NFL and he wasn't drafted until the 7th round and didn't make it in the league. According to the NFL argument, Taylor being good enough to win the Outland Trophy doesn't mean jack. Miami in 1994 had some guys that turned out to be decent NFLers: you know like Warren Sapp and Ray Lewis. How many legit Heisman Trophy winners become moot b/c of this argument? Penn State has what? 8 1st rounders the last 7 years in the NFL? how many championships do they have to show for that? (I apologize if I've hit a soft spot, its not intended) In 2005 Nebraska had 3 defensive players drafted in the top 40 picks. But that doesn't change the fact that sucked in 2004. It also doesn't account for vital factors like coaches. An NFL argument means guys like Paterno and Osborne are given equal weight (ie none) as a guy like Larry Coker. Sorry for the rant but I'm over the NFL BS when it comes to jackass Hurricane fans.

Shady? I must have missed that one. or are we editing history now? He had a rep as one of the best recruiters in the country but I don't remember anyone, for or against Nebraska, accusing Blake of being "shady". I do recall allegations from Sooner fans of his destroying recruiting info in anger after he was fired. but that has nothing to do with what he's being accused of at UNC.

Because Tom Osborne retired. and no one could run that offense the way he did.