Moiraine

So if any coach gets angry at male players or other male coaches on the field and has an outburst we should speculate they have tendencies, hidden or otherwise, to hit their wife? Or they get pissed at a diner 1 time after finding out their boss was fired and themselves possibly out of a job indicates those same tendencies? i think its safe that in hindsight, with all the other incidents, that this surprises nobody, and the most likely scenario in this case is that this person has anger issues. not sure what the point of the lengthy debate on this is. The judgement isn't being made solely on the other criteria, nobody thought we was a wife beater before he acted as such. Exactly. This conversation is weird.

I don't think calloused hands would feel good on manparts but I haven't thought to ask.

Do we know that Kaz thought it was fine for Bo to say these things? And let's not forget that it was the Reverend Ron Brown that followed Bo to Youngstown St. Suppose he beats his wife too? Kaz was the only coach with Bo at the meeting where those things were said. And Bo constantly asked him "right Kaz? Right? I told you this didnt I." and so on. it's a pretty easy to come to such a conlcusion. Well then I guess we can conclude that Tom Osborne, Jim Tressel, all of Bo's current assistants and players and any former players that said Bo made them men support Bo's opinions of Eichorst and beat their wives and/or girlfriends. They all support him so it's easy to come to that conclusion. Not beat wives/girlfriends. That wasnt the comment. It was about supporting Bo's opinions of Eichorst and calling him a c**t and pu&&y. No, I dont come to that conclusion. All I did was show pretty compelling evidence as to why someone would. He was the only coach at that meeting. Bo constantly turned to him during such meeting for reaffirment on his comments, so thats why I said it's easy to come to a conclusion that Kaz supported Bo's feelings on the matter. This little topic had really nothing to do with the wife beater part. Ok. So lets forget the wife beater part of Moiraine's comment. Jim Tressel must support Bo's views since he kept him employed after hearing the audio. TO must support Bo's views since he never came out publicly and said anything to the contrary. All of the coaches that work for Bo including the "honorable" Ron Brown must support his views since they continue to work for him. My point is just because someone is in the room doesn't mean they support what is being said. Bo did say "Eichorst is a c**t and a pu&&y, right Kaz?" And no where in the audio do you hear Kaz utter one single syllable. Now, I think Kaz is a cowardly piece of sh#t but some of these statements about how we can draw conclusions about this behavior are ridiculous. I didn't say people who call people those names or are okay with it beat women. I merely said it didn't surprise me. If you show lack of respect for women by using names for their genitalia to diss people, then it's not going to surprise me to find out that you show lack of respect for women in other ways. I'm sure you've never called someone a dick. Only my boyfriend. Also, I beat men.

Do we know that Kaz thought it was fine for Bo to say these things? And let's not forget that it was the Reverend Ron Brown that followed Bo to Youngstown St. Suppose he beats his wife too? Kaz was the only coach with Bo at the meeting where those things were said. And Bo constantly asked him "right Kaz? Right? I told you this didnt I." and so on. it's a pretty easy to come to such a conlcusion. Well then I guess we can conclude that Tom Osborne, Jim Tressel, all of Bo's current assistants and players and any former players that said Bo made them men support Bo's opinions of Eichorst and beat their wives and/or girlfriends. They all support him so it's easy to come to that conclusion. Not beat wives/girlfriends. That wasnt the comment. It was about supporting Bo's opinions of Eichorst and calling him a c**t and pu&&y. No, I dont come to that conclusion. All I did was show pretty compelling evidence as to why someone would. He was the only coach at that meeting. Bo constantly turned to him during such meeting for reaffirment on his comments, so thats why I said it's easy to come to a conclusion that Kaz supported Bo's feelings on the matter. This little topic had really nothing to do with the wife beater part. Ok. So lets forget the wife beater part of Moiraine's comment. Jim Tressel must support Bo's views since he kept him employed after hearing the audio. TO must support Bo's views since he never came out publicly and said anything to the contrary. All of the coaches that work for Bo including the "honorable" Ron Brown must support his views since they continue to work for him. My point is just because someone is in the room doesn't mean they support what is being said. Bo did say "Eichorst is a c**t and a pu&&y, right Kaz?" And no where in the audio do you hear Kaz utter one single syllable. Now, I think Kaz is a cowardly piece of sh#t but some of these statements about how we can draw conclusions about this behavior are ridiculous. I didn't say people who call people those names or are okay with it beat women. I merely said it didn't surprise me. If you show lack of respect for women by using names for their genitalia to diss people, then it's not going to surprise me to find out that you show lack of respect for women in other ways.

6 or 5 or 4 or 3 or 2 or 1

That's a good one. But on the flip side girls who say they don't lift because they don't want to look like a man. Agreed

define "an actual gym setup."

It's money in politics. This isn't a democracy. Money buys elections, money buys legislation, money buys the passing of legislation. Money helps those with money gain more money. Money helps those with money not lose any of their money. Money buys commercials and "news" that lull the masses into thinking their "side" is good and right and that their opinion and their vote matters.

High School P.E. teachers who pretend the girls don't exist and don't teach them how to do anything (e.g. squats, bench press, deadlifts).

A guy who thinks it's fine for his grown man of a boss to refer to people as c**ts and p*****s beats his wife. Color me surprised.

What's new? Haven't the players been "signing in" to lifts for several years? Don't get me wrong, it is very cool and cutting edge to closely follow gains and progression. Is there something new about what the staff is doing with the numbers? Just curious... A lot of the players had others sign them in and then would skip the lifting session. A majority of the time, Dobson had his assistants running the sessions and he would be doing something else. I have been told that Philipp is very hands on during the sessions and is there all the time. Making the player accountable for each other when it comes to training time. Not doubting what youre saying but I thought the point of the technology was to monitor weight/reps and potentially other statistics... Wouldn't that require more than just a login? They (whoever logged in) would have to actually do the reps unless Pelini's staff failed at utilizing the data. Which wouldn't surprise me since Pelini likes to "go with his gut."

Throwing mechanics are the least of his problems. It's mostly mental. E.g. he throws the ball into triple coverage when there's no one within 10 yards of one of the other receivers or a running back.

It's not like you'll stop by anyway. True. It's like 5 blocks from where I live. I don't like road trips.

Have you considered telling people where the tailgate will be located?

He was the back up QB Yes.

Hmph. No he won't. And I'd rather ride in the snow than the rain any day.

Hmmm, since 2000, OSU has the third best record in the Pac 10. Not exactly comparable to Purdue or Iowa State either. I'm kind of getting sick of fans talking down about OSU like it's still 1995. And who was the coach for most of those years? Hmmmm. Don't even try talking to that guy.

This would be great. If he's the best talent we have at quarterback, then he will set himself apart. However, I don't believe for a minute the talk about Riley adjusting to his personnel. It will be who fits Riley's system.....which is a pro style drop back quarterback. I don't think our running game will be as strong under Riley. (But I'm sure Riley "appreciates" the input from Dr Tom anyway......) If this was anything new from you, maybe someone would care.

Yep. Lost in the 2010 Big 12 Champ game 23-20. Had 4 turnovers. 1 in the endzone that I believe was a pick thrown by TM. Not to mention TM was still in bad shape.

Sigh.

Y'all should quit saying you'll take their packages.

This thread would've been so much better if the OP-maker had replied (multiple times). I am disappoint.

Thanks Obama

Aww he's just a 'lil guy.

I think I only watched a quarter of that Washington game.