Foppa Posted July 17, 2007 Share Posted July 17, 2007 Purify set to settle cases BY STEVEN M. SIPPLE / Lincoln Journal Star Tuesday, Jul 17, 2007 - 04:34:17 pm CDT It appears Nebraska standout wide receiver Maurice Purify’s two recent arrests will be resolved in court Wednesday in one fell swoop. According to court records, Purify has made a plea arrangement that would essentially cover both cases. Purify, regarded as the Huskers’ most potent weapon on offense, was arrested May 5 and charged with two counts of assault, trespassing, failure to comply and resisting arrest. The charges stemmed from an alleged altercation at a downtown bar. Nearly a month later, the 21-year-old was cited for driving while intoxicated. Purify’s attorney, Jon Braaten of Lincoln, filed a motion Monday in Lancaster County Court that requests a plea arrangement for the DUI to take place in front of the same judge and at the same time that was set for Purify’s plea to charges relating to the tavern altercation. The exact nature of Purify’s plea agreement won’t be known until Wednesday when he appears before a judge. Purify’s attorney has requested that sentencing for both cases also take place Wednesday. The plea deal could be good news for Purify because it would mean his legal matters basically would move into the hands of Nebraska head coach Bill Callahan. He said last month he won’t make any permanent decisions regarding the status of the suspended receiver until the player’s legal issues were resolved in court. A 6-foot-4, 225-pound native of Eureka, Calif., Purify became Nebraska’s go-to receiver a few games into last season and finished the year with 34 receptions for a team-best 630 yards and seven touchdowns. Among his 34 receptions, 29 were good for first downs, and 14 of his catches went for more than 20 yards. Purify, who transferred to NU last year from San Francisco City College, hasn’t been allowed to work out with the team in this summer’s offseason program. The Huskers are set to begin preseason camp Aug. 6 and open the season Sept. 1 in Lincoln against Nevada. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 well, i would think by the end of the week or first part of next week, we should know cally's verdict too. Quote Link to comment
kc_husker Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 well, i would think by the end of the week or first part of next week, we should know cally's verdict too. I doubt it you dont think Cally and or the team gave Purify a "what to do list or not do list" until the season starts? Quote Link to comment
Eric the Red Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Does Callahan hammer him? Half a season suspension? Or does he simply say next mistake your gone with no suspension? Quote Link to comment
husker rob Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 i have seen alot of 1st offense DD charges plead down to reckless driving. but if one plea is going to cover both incidents then who knows what is going to happen. hopefully with what ever suspension or punishment the Cally decides Mo will be able to start practicing with the team at the beginning of fall camp and not have to wait until the suspension is over. unless it is a season suspension, which i doubt it will be or it would have already happened Quote Link to comment
huskerguy Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I say he's gone 4 games max... most likely 2 Quote Link to comment
Husker_x Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 Going with my gut on this one, I'm thinking two game suspension max, but I wouldn't do a double-take if he gets the ultimatum "One glance in the wrong direction and you're out of here." I think the latter decision would a) be effective for Mo because it would relate the serious nature of his position and b.) it would appease the fan base to a certain degree. If he complies, we'll know he learned his lesson. If not, he'll likely have ruined his career. At first I was a bit hesitant to think that such a "light" sentence would be plausible, but given our schedule, the team's needs, Mo's unique talent and position in the game, and the overblown (in my opinion) nature of his first offenses, I don't see it as completely off the table yet. We'll see what Cally does, but I don't think this is another Lawrence Philips situation. In the grand scheme of things I think if Mo can learn from this it would be better for him that he plays the game. And USC must be razed to the ground. Quote Link to comment
Drowning_in_the_Sea_of_Red Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I'll say 3 games... with a one more strike and your out. Quote Link to comment
huskernumerouno Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I think that with MP wanting to showcase his talent against the trojans that he will be suspended for at least that game. I do not see him playing against USC Quote Link to comment
Foppa Posted July 18, 2007 Author Share Posted July 18, 2007 I'm seeing "2 game suspension no matter what", but even if that's it...any other issues and he's done. And that is a Swedish massage, IMO. :asshat Quote Link to comment
adc7236 Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I am seeing the never ending huge debate opening up again about Mo and what he deserves. I thought that thread would never die. Quote Link to comment
huskernumerouno Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 It will start up again after the punishment is doled out. Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I think barring what he gets from a plea, I think he misses no games with a Bobby Knightesque "zero tolerance" policy. Whether that is lax or warrented will be debated ad infinitum, but good on him that he did what he did a great while (relatively) before the season. Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I say he's gone 4 games max... most likely 2 EXACTLY!! Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 At first I was a bit hesitant to think that such a "light" sentence would be plausible, but given our schedule, the team's needs, Mo's unique talent and position in the game, and the overblown (in my opinion) nature of his first offenses, I don't see it as completely off the table yet. He'll get what he'll get, but please let not his "unique talent" and "team needs" have any bearings on that decision. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.