HuskerNMO Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 I think the best use of our RB's would be Helu as the primary ball carrier, using Lucky as a hybrid back who can give Helu a breather and would also be our third and long back because of his receiving skills. You could also split him out occasionally to change up the look. Keep Q in as a fullback and short carry guy, and occasionally give him a screen as a change-up to the opposing D. Quote Link to comment
EbylHusker Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 I think Lucky and Helu should split time as the main RB's. Castille is third, but a close third, for me. Lucky really has not done poorly this season, though some will still try to tell you he has. Helu is a better pure runner, though. And when there is not much run blocking going on, Helu gives you the best chance to make something of nothing. Lucky relies on better blocking. But I would still split them as the main. Quote Link to comment
Dan_F_30 Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 The running backs aren't the problem. Quote Link to comment
admo Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 ^ agreed. This line is not very impressive. Quote Link to comment
HUSKER 37 Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 I think Lucky and Helu should split time as the main RB's. Castille is third, but a close third, for me. Lucky really has not done poorly this season, though some will still try to tell you he has. Helu is a better pure runner, though. And when there is not much run blocking going on, Helu gives you the best chance to make something of nothing. Lucky relies on better blocking. But I would still split them as the main. Better off not letting the situation dictate which one you have in there..The opposing Defense doesn't need any more help figuring out what play is coming next..We just don't dominate like that anymore. Quote Link to comment
dizzturbedNUfan Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 If you feel as if the line can't block then that should be an automatic vote for Helu. You should want the guy that at least has the moves to make something happen when nothing is there. I just wish we could see Helu play a full game, or at least a half. Maybe he wouldn't do any better then Lucky, Maybe he would. Quote Link to comment
HuskerNMO Posted September 28, 2008 Author Share Posted September 28, 2008 I think Lucky and Helu should split time as the main RB's. Castille is third, but a close third, for me. Lucky really has not done poorly this season, though some will still try to tell you he has. Helu is a better pure runner, though. And when there is not much run blocking going on, Helu gives you the best chance to make something of nothing. Lucky relies on better blocking. But I would still split them as the main. Better off not letting the situation dictate which one you have in there..The opposing Defense doesn't need any more help figuring out what play is coming next..We just don't dominate like that anymore. The offense has a better tempo to it when Helu is on the field. I think Marlon is a great third down back and could be effective as a slot reciever, I say line him up in the backfield sometimes WITH Helu and motion him out to get him isolated on a LB or S. Quote Link to comment
General Blackshirt Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 Each of them have their things that they are the best (of the 3), but I can't think of a major weakness for Helu like i can for the other two. Quote Link to comment
Lyons in the Sea of Red. Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 I think Lucky and Helu should split time as the main RB's. Castille is third, but a close third, for me. Lucky really has not done poorly this season, though some will still try to tell you he has. Helu is a better pure runner, though. And when there is not much run blocking going on, Helu gives you the best chance to make something of nothing. Lucky relies on better blocking. But I would still split them as the main. Better off not letting the situation dictate which one you have in there..The opposing Defense doesn't need any more help figuring out what play is coming next..We just don't dominate like that anymore. The offense has a better tempo to it when Helu is on the field. I think Marlon is a great third down back and could be effective as a slot reciever, I say line him up in the backfield sometimes WITH Helu and motion him out to get him isolated on a LB or S. thank you lord! someone understands my thinking! Quote Link to comment
Pedro Guerrero Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 Doesn't Beck decide which RB plays? I may be wrong but the position coach tells the kids to go in and out. I vote for both at the same time. Lucky is money as a receiver and he should be on the field every down(not saying as the feature back, but aside from Swift he is our biggest receiving threat) Quote Link to comment
BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 I vote for Helu as the main RB, Lucky at WR and Castille at FB. The more weapons on the field at the same time the better. Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 I vote for Helu as the main RB, Lucky at WR and Castille at FB. The more weapons on the field at the same time the better. Damned good idea. Quote Link to comment
kstatehater Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 The running backs aren't the problem. This is true. HOWEVER, with the line struggling like it is Helu should get the majority of the carries. He is the best OVERALL RUNNING back we have. Lucky is the better overall player, however he rarely breaks a tackle, he can make people miss in the open field, but first he needs to get to the open field. The problems the line is having, demands a back who can break tackles, but also have the speed to make something big happen. This demands for Helu. I'm a huge Lucky fan, it took me a long time to admit this, but we need Helu. Quote Link to comment
HuskerTrucker Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 The offensive line isn't opening any holes...not totally the running backs fault. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.