DeathCultArmaggedon Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I know it depends on the outcome of his senior season, but I am interested to hear what people think. Personally, I think that he is definitely in the top 10, but would place a few guys ahead of him: Wistrom, Jason Peter, Rucker, and Vanden Bosch, and possibly Carriker. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 If he keeps progressing and continues to dominate then he could land among the top 10 greats on the D-Line. I think he can do it. It takes a special guy to take on the double team and still get the sack. Quote Link to comment
cb1954 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I know it depends on the outcome of his senior season, but I am interested to hear what people think. Personally, I think that he is definitely in the top 10, but would place a few guys ahead of him: Wistrom, Jason Peter, Rucker, and Vanden Bosch, and possibly Carriker. With a good senior season he maybe has a shot at top 10. Here is a list of past DLine All Americans (last 40 some years) Some are 2 time selections and I think there were 4 Outland or Lombardi winners. Also many other All Conference picks. Wayne Meylan - Larry Jackobsen Rich Glover Willie Harper John Dutton Mike Fultz Bob Martin George Andrews Derrie Nelson Jimmy Williams Neil Smith Danny Noonan Jim Skow Kenny Walker Jared Tomich Grant Wistrom Jason Peter Quote Link to comment
HuskerTrucker Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Definitely think he will be in the top 10, the only thing that could derail him is if he does something stupid and gets suspended or kicked off the team - or get hurt. In the first part of the season I felt like he was a little out of control, but I think they have gotten him to start using his head more, so hopefully he will not get into trouble on or off the field, and stay healthy... Quote Link to comment
Huskers Forever Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Like I have said before Suh reminds me of Steve Warren . Same build and athletic ability, although Suh may be a little faster. Quote Link to comment
BuzzardBilly Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Dude's not even first team Big 12 - how could he be among the top ten greatest in Husker lore? Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Won't he have to become an All American before we can even compare him to the already 17 All Americans that have played here? Quote Link to comment
bbhusker Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Dude's not even first team Big 12 - how could he be among the top ten greatest in Husker lore? If NU was 11-1 he would be 1st team Big XII. There is so much bias these days that the post season awards have gotten almost pointless. Its like, "Ok player 1 had 6 sacks, 60 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, and he played on an 11-1 team. Ok, player 2 had 13 sacks, 72 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, 2 int's returned for TDs, and he played on an 8-4 team. Both players are in the same conference and play pretty close to the same schedule. Well, player 1 must be better because his team is better." It's the same way all over the country. If Suh keeps progressing at the rate he is, he will be a top 10 pick in the NFL Draft just like Wistrom and Peter were. But he won't get the national recognition unless the team makes some noise next season. Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Well when Suh registers 13 sacks and 72 tackles, you let me know because his stats weren't even close to this. Quote Link to comment
VA Husker Fan Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Dude's not even first team Big 12 - how could he be among the top ten greatest in Husker lore? If NU was 11-1 he would be 1st team Big XII. There is so much bias these days that the post season awards have gotten almost pointless. Its like, "Ok player 1 had 6 sacks, 60 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, and he played on an 11-1 team. Ok, player 2 had 13 sacks, 72 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, 2 int's returned for TDs, and he played on an 8-4 team. Both players are in the same conference and play pretty close to the same schedule. Well, player 1 must be better because his team is better." It's the same way all over the country. If Suh keeps progressing at the rate he is, he will be a top 10 pick in the NFL Draft just like Wistrom and Peter were. But he won't get the national recognition unless the team makes some noise next season. You mean like Chris Long last year? Quote Link to comment
bbhusker Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Well when Suh registers 13 sacks and 72 tackles, you let me know because his stats weren't even close to this. It was just an example, settle down. Quote Link to comment
bbhusker Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Dude's not even first team Big 12 - how could he be among the top ten greatest in Husker lore? If NU was 11-1 he would be 1st team Big XII. There is so much bias these days that the post season awards have gotten almost pointless. Its like, "Ok player 1 had 6 sacks, 60 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, and he played on an 11-1 team. Ok, player 2 had 13 sacks, 72 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, 2 int's returned for TDs, and he played on an 8-4 team. Both players are in the same conference and play pretty close to the same schedule. Well, player 1 must be better because his team is better." It's the same way all over the country. If Suh keeps progressing at the rate he is, he will be a top 10 pick in the NFL Draft just like Wistrom and Peter were. But he won't get the national recognition unless the team makes some noise next season. You mean like Chris Long last year? What are you getting at? Quote Link to comment
clone Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I know it depends on the outcome of his senior season, but I am interested to hear what people think. Personally, I think that he is definitely in the top 10, but would place a few guys ahead of him: Wistrom, Jason Peter, Rucker, and Vanden Bosch, and possibly Carriker. so far... he's no Rich Glover. Quote Link to comment
redout22 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 It kind of depends on the type of recognition he gets. If he has a great senior year he could be one of the the greatest d-line men we have seen in awhile Quote Link to comment
VA Husker Fan Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Dude's not even first team Big 12 - how could he be among the top ten greatest in Husker lore? If NU was 11-1 he would be 1st team Big XII. There is so much bias these days that the post season awards have gotten almost pointless. Its like, "Ok player 1 had 6 sacks, 60 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, and he played on an 11-1 team. Ok, player 2 had 13 sacks, 72 tkls, 1 fumble recovery, 2 int's returned for TDs, and he played on an 8-4 team. Both players are in the same conference and play pretty close to the same schedule. Well, player 1 must be better because his team is better." It's the same way all over the country. If Suh keeps progressing at the rate he is, he will be a top 10 pick in the NFL Draft just like Wistrom and Peter were. But he won't get the national recognition unless the team makes some noise next season. You mean like Chris Long last year? What are you getting at? Figure it out. Was Long's team 11-1? Yet he managed to make All-America and win the Hendricks award. For the Heisman, you're right. For anything else, not so much. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.