huskers1 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Caveman...nice insight I was wondering myself why he wasn't anywhere on the depth chart and what you said makes perfect sense. I am also very happy to see that Curenski and Bell are both 2's. I really like the speed we have there this year. Quote Link to comment
huskerjack23 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 what i notice is thenarse is still not in the top slot on the chart? how is this guy such a fan favorite and just CANNOT put it together to start? Quote Link to comment
General Blackshirt Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Interesting that he is listed at the 4th FB and Helu the 3rd FB What are you talking about? Quote Link to comment
shyndy Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Its funny how everyone on the depth chart is pretty much where i have everyone on NCAA 2010. haha. Oh yea i was gonna ask, what do the letters mean? How many times that person has lettered, I'm guessing. Not sure what that is on the college level, in HS it was something like playing in 15 quarters or something terribly easy. Personally, I'm surprised there is an OR between West and Dennard. I know alot of people on here don't like west, but I felt like he did a pretty good job last year, good at playing physically at the line. Must mean that Dennard has really come along, he looked promising in flashes last year. Also since Paul is our best reciever, I wonder how much we will actually see him returning punts/ kicks? I guess swift still returned alot of punts last year so maybe it doesn't matter. Quote Link to comment
JTrain Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Why do we continue to list a fullback on the depth chart? Nostalgia? Quote Link to comment
redout22 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 This is out earlier then I thought. No big surprises to me. Quote Link to comment
huskerjack23 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Why do we continue to list a fullback on the depth chart? Nostalgia? that's true...we can't be running with a base I-form anymore. it'd be more appropriate to put either a second HB or a second TE or a third WR. but those are all on there so i don't think it matters. Quote Link to comment
caveman99 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Interesting that he is listed at the 4th FB and Helu the 3rd FB What are you talking about? A bad attempt at humor, when I first read the chart as posted I didn't see the IB listed. It kind of looked like Helu and Rex were backing up the FB's. Quote Link to comment
General Blackshirt Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Gotchya! I was worried. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.