BlackShirt1340 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Whether or not you care about something, that's your call. Just keep in mind when you post about something, I'll bring it inline with reality. How generous of you. Trust me.....it's the least I can do Haha, yeah...drama usually isn't my thing. But I had to throw my hat in the ring there. He tries to make people feel stupid for posting things that are on their mind, on a public message board nonetheless, and it just gets tiring to constantly see. He's no better than anyone else, but he really thinks he is. It's funny to me. Sorry for the drama people, carry on. I'm done with the situation. Did you ever start? The only reason that he thinks he is better than everyone is because he is. Well... at least that's what he tells himself in the mirror every morning. Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Red Kool Aid and the hype http://videos.kansascity.com/vmix_hosted_a...edia?id=6570590 KOOL AID WAS INVENTED IN NEBRASKA! And consumed here in mass quantities. Quote Link to comment
BigRedNV Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Pass me another beer Fro, this one is empty. I'll take one too Wages. Quote Link to comment
ICT HSKR 10 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I got your meaning. But who cares? Seriously..... Who Cares? The media has bills to pay and coming up stories such as this is a great way for the "easy" to get all upset and continue to watch and talk about what the media is saying. It's free advertsing for them. You wrote it the way you got it, and I read it the way you got it. Noted. The next time I think I care about something I'll be sure to check with you for approval first. (looks like I'm not the only one who thought it was a good point though . . .) Make sure you check and underline that note. If you look at other posts, Vince likes to give his approval on everything, whether the poster wants it or not. Just like Colorado sucking, it's going to happen and there's nothing you can do to stop it. Give my approval? Never. I just don't take this stuff seriously, and I look at it for what it is and nothing more. Sorry, for you, that I get it and you don't. Oh almighty Infomercial cleaning dude, please impart some of your wisdom on us lowly huskerboard posters. What is this "it" that you accuse so many on this board of not getting? The fact that you change your arguments from post to post? The fact that you do, in fact, have to give your approval on people's post, and if they dont' agree with you, then they don't get it? Because I can assure you...well all "get" that just fine. But yet, I'm still unsure, so please, enlighten us. Let me make it beyond simple for you..... and a few others. Over the last few years MU has owned NU - with last year being the most recent. In came a very average MU team to Lincoln and NU let MU score 52 points. The last few years. the games have been blow outs in MU's favor. Until NU decides to win and does so, the media will always spin towards MU. From Gabbert type stories to what Chase Daniels will be eating while watching the game on Thursday, the media will gravitate to the better of the two teams. It's all to sell media. Once NU bucks up and takes control of the series we will see the slant slide in NU's favor. There, I hope you get it as I really don't think I can make it any more simple for you. Only thing I differ about this is last year's Missouri team was far from "very average". This is probably the best collection of experienced talent they've thrown on the field in a very long time. This was the team that MU fans were claiming to be their BCS championship team. They looked like it against us, but didn't fill the bill in the end. NU completely changed their approach going into that game and it backfired big time. I know they learned from that and I'm looking forward to a great game. I don't think it will be an easy win for whoever comes out on top, just hope it's us! GBR Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Whether or not you care about something, that's your call. Just keep in mind when you post about something, I'll bring it inline with reality. How generous of you. Trust me.....it's the least I can do Haha, yeah...drama usually isn't my thing. But I had to throw my hat in the ring there. He tries to make people feel stupid for posting things that are on their mind, on a public message board nonetheless, and it just gets tiring to constantly see. He's no better than anyone else, but he really thinks he is. It's funny to me. Sorry for the drama people, carry on. I'm done with the situation. Did you ever start? The only reason that he thinks he is better than everyone is because he is. Well... at least that's what he tells himself in the mirror every morning. Nice comeback. Did you think of that one yourself? If so, you might want to take a rest. Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Pass me another beer Fro, this one is empty. I'll take one too Wages. Me too Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I got your meaning. But who cares? Seriously..... Who Cares? The media has bills to pay and coming up stories such as this is a great way for the "easy" to get all upset and continue to watch and talk about what the media is saying. It's free advertsing for them. You wrote it the way you got it, and I read it the way you got it. Noted. The next time I think I care about something I'll be sure to check with you for approval first. (looks like I'm not the only one who thought it was a good point though . . .) Make sure you check and underline that note. If you look at other posts, Vince likes to give his approval on everything, whether the poster wants it or not. Just like Colorado sucking, it's going to happen and there's nothing you can do to stop it. Give my approval? Never. I just don't take this stuff seriously, and I look at it for what it is and nothing more. Sorry, for you, that I get it and you don't. Oh almighty Infomercial cleaning dude, please impart some of your wisdom on us lowly huskerboard posters. What is this "it" that you accuse so many on this board of not getting? The fact that you change your arguments from post to post? The fact that you do, in fact, have to give your approval on people's post, and if they dont' agree with you, then they don't get it? Because I can assure you...well all "get" that just fine. But yet, I'm still unsure, so please, enlighten us. Let me make it beyond simple for you..... and a few others. Over the last few years MU has owned NU - with last year being the most recent. In came a very average MU team to Lincoln and NU let MU score 52 points. The last few years. the games have been blow outs in MU's favor. Until NU decides to win and does so, the media will always spin towards MU. From Gabbert type stories to what Chase Daniels will be eating while watching the game on Thursday, the media will gravitate to the better of the two teams. It's all to sell media. Once NU bucks up and takes control of the series we will see the slant slide in NU's favor. There, I hope you get it as I really don't think I can make it any more simple for you. Only thing I differ about this is last year's Missouri team was far from "very average". This is probably the best collection of experienced talent they've thrown on the field in a very long time. This was the team that MU fans were claiming to be their BCS championship team. They looked like it against us, but didn't fill the bill in the end. NU completely changed their approach going into that game and it backfired big time. I know they learned from that and I'm looking forward to a great game. I don't think it will be an easy win for whoever comes out on top, just hope it's us! GBR I see your point. However when I said average I meant it from an overall point of view. I agree that the team they fielded last year was the best collection of talent they've thrown on the field in a very long time. In terms of MU football they were a great MU team. However in terms of college football talent, they were an average team. I see your point though. Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted October 7, 2009 Author Share Posted October 7, 2009 Let me make it beyond simple for you..... and a few others. Over the last few years MU has owned NU - with last year being the most recent. In came a very average MU team to Lincoln and NU let MU score 52 points. The last few years. the games have been blow outs in MU's favor. Until NU decides to win and does so, the media will always spin towards MU. From Gabbert type stories to what Chase Daniels will be eating while watching the game on Thursday, the media will gravitate to the better of the two teams. It's all to sell media. Once NU bucks up and takes control of the series we will see the slant slide in NU's favor. There, I hope you get it as I really don't think I can make it any more simple for you. Despite your protestations to the contrary, you still don't get it. That or you are stubbornly trying to twist this into something that fits with your opinion. I don't care that they are covering Missouri. I don't care that they are covering Gabbert. I don't even think that they are biased against Nebraska. My ONLY complaint is that they are inventing a story line, trying to drum up emotions, hyping something nonexistent, etc. i.e. that Nebraska fans are still upset that Gabbert decommited. It's simply not true and I think that the media should spend more efforts on REAL stories rather than inventing them. Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Let me make it beyond simple for you..... and a few others. Over the last few years MU has owned NU - with last year being the most recent. In came a very average MU team to Lincoln and NU let MU score 52 points. The last few years. the games have been blow outs in MU's favor. Until NU decides to win and does so, the media will always spin towards MU. From Gabbert type stories to what Chase Daniels will be eating while watching the game on Thursday, the media will gravitate to the better of the two teams. It's all to sell media. Once NU bucks up and takes control of the series we will see the slant slide in NU's favor. There, I hope you get it as I really don't think I can make it any more simple for you. Despite your protestations to the contrary, you still don't get it. That or you are stubbornly trying to twist this into something that fits with your opinion. I don't care that they are covering Missouri. I don't care that they are covering Gabbert. I don't even think that they are biased against Nebraska. My ONLY complaint is that they are inventing a story line, trying to drum up emotions, hyping something nonexistent, etc. i.e. that Nebraska fans are still upset that Gabbert decommited. It's simply not true and I think that the media should spend more efforts on REAL stories rather than inventing them. Corky, it's you that doesn't get it. NU wins and win like they should - these stories stop. MU continues to win and the stories like this will continue. Get it now? God I hope so. It can't be anymore clear that what I've made it. Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted October 7, 2009 Author Share Posted October 7, 2009 Let me make it beyond simple for you..... and a few others. Over the last few years MU has owned NU - with last year being the most recent. In came a very average MU team to Lincoln and NU let MU score 52 points. The last few years. the games have been blow outs in MU's favor. Until NU decides to win and does so, the media will always spin towards MU. From Gabbert type stories to what Chase Daniels will be eating while watching the game on Thursday, the media will gravitate to the better of the two teams. It's all to sell media. Once NU bucks up and takes control of the series we will see the slant slide in NU's favor. There, I hope you get it as I really don't think I can make it any more simple for you. Despite your protestations to the contrary, you still don't get it. That or you are stubbornly trying to twist this into something that fits with your opinion. I don't care that they are covering Missouri. I don't care that they are covering Gabbert. I don't even think that they are biased against Nebraska. My ONLY complaint is that they are inventing a story line, trying to drum up emotions, hyping something nonexistent, etc. i.e. that Nebraska fans are still upset that Gabbert decommited. It's simply not true and I think that the media should spend more efforts on REAL stories rather than inventing them. Corky, it's you that doesn't get it. NU wins and win like they should - these stories stop. MU continues to win and the stories like this will continue. Get it now? God I hope so. It can't be anymore clear that what I've made it. Childish name calling aside, would you like to make a wager on that? Even if Nebraska beats Missouri every single year that Gabbert plays there, I will bet you that we hear the same "former Nebraska recruit Blaine Gabbert" spiel every year. You seem angry. Maybe you should lie down for awhile. Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Let me make it beyond simple for you..... and a few others. Over the last few years MU has owned NU - with last year being the most recent. In came a very average MU team to Lincoln and NU let MU score 52 points. The last few years. the games have been blow outs in MU's favor. Until NU decides to win and does so, the media will always spin towards MU. From Gabbert type stories to what Chase Daniels will be eating while watching the game on Thursday, the media will gravitate to the better of the two teams. It's all to sell media. Once NU bucks up and takes control of the series we will see the slant slide in NU's favor. There, I hope you get it as I really don't think I can make it any more simple for you. Despite your protestations to the contrary, you still don't get it. That or you are stubbornly trying to twist this into something that fits with your opinion. I don't care that they are covering Missouri. I don't care that they are covering Gabbert. I don't even think that they are biased against Nebraska. My ONLY complaint is that they are inventing a story line, trying to drum up emotions, hyping something nonexistent, etc. i.e. that Nebraska fans are still upset that Gabbert decommited. It's simply not true and I think that the media should spend more efforts on REAL stories rather than inventing them. Corky, it's you that doesn't get it. NU wins and win like they should - these stories stop. MU continues to win and the stories like this will continue. Get it now? God I hope so. It can't be anymore clear that what I've made it. Childish name calling aside, would you like to make a wager on that? Even if Nebraska beats Missouri every single year that Gabbert plays there, I will bet you that we hear the same "former Nebraska recruit Blaine Gabbert" spiel every year. You seem angry. Maybe you should lie down for awhile. You need to take a shower to remove the sand, take a midol , than take a long rest. All in that order. Quote Link to comment
BlackShirt1340 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Let me make it beyond simple for you..... and a few others. Over the last few years MU has owned NU - with last year being the most recent. In came a very average MU team to Lincoln and NU let MU score 52 points. The last few years. the games have been blow outs in MU's favor. Until NU decides to win and does so, the media will always spin towards MU. From Gabbert type stories to what Chase Daniels will be eating while watching the game on Thursday, the media will gravitate to the better of the two teams. It's all to sell media. Once NU bucks up and takes control of the series we will see the slant slide in NU's favor. There, I hope you get it as I really don't think I can make it any more simple for you. Despite your protestations to the contrary, you still don't get it. That or you are stubbornly trying to twist this into something that fits with your opinion. I don't care that they are covering Missouri. I don't care that they are covering Gabbert. I don't even think that they are biased against Nebraska. My ONLY complaint is that they are inventing a story line, trying to drum up emotions, hyping something nonexistent, etc. i.e. that Nebraska fans are still upset that Gabbert decommited. It's simply not true and I think that the media should spend more efforts on REAL stories rather than inventing them. Corky, it's you that doesn't get it. NU wins and win like they should - these stories stop. MU continues to win and the stories like this will continue. Get it now? God I hope so. It can't be anymore clear that what I've made it. Childish name calling aside, would you like to make a wager on that? Even if Nebraska beats Missouri every single year that Gabbert plays there, I will bet you that we hear the same "former Nebraska recruit Blaine Gabbert" spiel every year. You seem angry. Maybe you should lie down for awhile. You need to take a shower, a midol , than a long rest. All in that order. Here goes the Shamwow guy.... getting all butthurt over a public message board again. Vincey... don't let your manhood get damaged too much because someone on the internet doesn't agree with you Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted October 7, 2009 Author Share Posted October 7, 2009 How's this guy not banned yet? Oh well. Hopefully just a matter of time. Back on topic . . . Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.