admo Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 From a completely objective point of view... Lee didn't fumble on the first play from scrimmage. The interception on the goal line was a take-away by the defense. Lee put the ball on the money. Lee didn't poke the ball out of Paul's hands. Lee was 20 yards away when Helu fumbled again. Lee was 10 yards away when Robinson was stripped. (Nice of Keith Williams to get in Robinson's face though) Lee was nowhere near Holt when he was stripped. Lee hit Gilleylen in the hands.... Then Lee threw an interception. If you blame that loss on Lee it's because you feel the need for a scapegoat. Absolutely agreeing, brotha Quote Link to comment
PlatteHusker Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I cannot believe people that are backing Lee. There are people in a war right now fighting for you to continue to miss the point. It is leadership, IMO, plain and simple. Leadership is something Lee doesn't possess. I can't see many offensive players looking at him as their leader. Our QB right now is the guy in Gladiator - NO, not Maximus - the guy that pisses down his own leg prior to entering the first arena. Everyone who has watched the first 7 games, knows he cannot get it done against a formidable foe. He cannot put confidence into the other ten guys starring back at him in the huddle. They know he can't run it and if he throws they are going to have to make the play themselves (and get decked by doing it), because the throw is rarely right on. THERE IS NO CONFIDENCE ANYWHERE ON OUR OFFENSE - and that confidence starts with a QB. LEADERSHIP 101. I hope things get better. GBR! Quote Link to comment
redout22 Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 From a completely objective point of view... Lee didn't fumble on the first play from scrimmage. The interception on the goal line was a take-away by the defense. Lee put the ball on the money. Lee didn't poke the ball out of Paul's hands. Lee was 20 yards away when Helu fumbled again. Lee was 10 yards away when Robinson was stripped. (Nice of Keith Williams to get in Robinson's face though) Lee was nowhere near Holt when he was stripped. Lee hit Gilleylen in the hands.... Then Lee threw an interception. If you blame that loss on Lee it's because you feel the need for a scapegoat. I still think that the 1st pick was Lee's fault. It was severly underthrown and if ISU's LB wasn't a midget he could have easily gotten an INT. Plus it was behind McNeil as well. But MUTigerFan please find a way to destroy ISU. I hate them. Quote Link to comment
Twodocs Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 this is nothing nothing just need to tweak the Multiple WCO! Quote Link to comment
HuskerT Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 From a completely objective point of view... Lee didn't fumble on the first play from scrimmage. The interception on the goal line was a take-away by the defense. Lee put the ball on the money. Lee didn't poke the ball out of Paul's hands. Lee was 20 yards away when Helu fumbled again. Lee was 10 yards away when Robinson was stripped. (Nice of Keith Williams to get in Robinson's face though) Lee was nowhere near Holt when he was stripped. Lee hit Gilleylen in the hands.... Then Lee threw an interception. If you blame that loss on Lee it's because you feel the need for a scapegoat. I agree with your point of view for this game, but considering our recent struggles (for whatever reason) I like many others would just like to see what Green could do if he got a start. Your point is well taken, but right now what could it hurt. Maybe with Green we win 9-7. Quote Link to comment
AF Husker Fan Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 i dont think the pass to mcneill was on the money...: Quote Link to comment
HuskerT Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 i dont think the pass to mcneill was on the money...: Neither was the pass to Gilleylen, but the pass to Jesse Smith (ISU's middle LB) was! Quote Link to comment
crispy Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Here is the post game interview if you havn't seen it http://www.huskerextra.com/articles/2009/1...51201018990.txt Quote Link to comment
NU41SB Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Guess there is no other QB in the nation that has WR's that make plays for them right? I mean, every other QB in the nation hits the receiver "in the numbers" every pass. Quote Link to comment
cornhuskersftw Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I have to say I agree with Tim Griffin... If you don't want to start Green, then throw him in for a couple of snaps here and there to keep the opposing defense on their toes and give our offense a little spark now and then. And these would notably come at times where Lee and company are just not gelling. With Green being able to run and pass, he could be a great game changer when our offense stalls. It's worth a shot... And Watson really needs to let things develop. If our running game is going well, why try to change it with crappy passing routes?! Quote Link to comment
HuskerT Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I have to say I agree with Tim Griffin... If you don't want to start Green, then throw him in for a couple of snaps here and there to keep the opposing defense on their toes and give our offense a little spark now and then. And these would notably come at times where Lee and company are just not gelling. With Green being able to run and pass, he could be a great game changer when our offense stalls. It's worth a shot... And Watson really needs to let things develop. If our running game is going well, why try to change it with crappy passing routes?! If he doesn't plan on giving him a shot than why the heck did he burn his redshirt? Washington could have came in for mop up time against the sunbelt and you can always burn it in an emergency. Quote Link to comment
KansasHusker Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 i dont think the pass to mcneill was on the money...: Neither was the pass to Gilleylen, but the pass to Jesse Smith (ISU's middle LB) was! The pass to McNeill was behind and short. The pass to Gilleylen was high and away. I just think it is going to bite us in the behind if a change isn't made soon. Especially if Zac plays like he's on an empty tank this coming weekend. It would be nice to see Zac come out next saturday and play good, confident, and lead us down the field for a change...but I don't think he has it in him. If Watson keeps drawing up these QB designed runs with Lee, I'm going to completely lose it. Quote Link to comment
typ3kal Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I have to say I agree with Tim Griffin... If you don't want to start Green, then throw him in for a couple of snaps here and there to keep the opposing defense on their toes and give our offense a little spark now and then. And these would notably come at times where Lee and company are just not gelling. With Green being able to run and pass, he could be a great game changer when our offense stalls. It's worth a shot... And Watson really needs to let things develop. If our running game is going well, why try to change it with crappy passing routes?! If he doesn't plan on giving him a shot than why the heck did he burn his redshirt? Washington could have came in for mop up time against the sunbelt and you can always burn it in an emergency. Haven't we all been asking this all year? Last year it seemed Bo was saving redshirts for the future.. now it seems he is cutting down on Green's eligibility.. Maybe Green will redshirt next year if Spano is back? and then play 3 years as a starter.. Quote Link to comment
cornhuskersftw Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I have to say I agree with Tim Griffin... If you don't want to start Green, then throw him in for a couple of snaps here and there to keep the opposing defense on their toes and give our offense a little spark now and then. And these would notably come at times where Lee and company are just not gelling. With Green being able to run and pass, he could be a great game changer when our offense stalls. It's worth a shot... And Watson really needs to let things develop. If our running game is going well, why try to change it with crappy passing routes?! If he doesn't plan on giving him a shot than why the heck did he burn his redshirt? Washington could have came in for mop up time against the sunbelt and you can always burn it in an emergency. I have no idea whether Bo plans on giving him a shot or why they burned his redshirt... But since the deed has already been done, then I think they need to give Green some play time. I would prefer that Green get a chance to start and see how things go, but it appears that Lee is going to remain. So let Green come in and mix things up when drives start becoming three and outs or stalling in the red zone. JMO Quote Link to comment
clone Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I have to say I agree with Tim Griffin... If you don't want to start Green, then throw him in for a couple of snaps here and there to keep the opposing defense on their toes and give our offense a little spark now and then. I believe he will do exactly that. but it has to be at the right time. a two point game ain't the time. lee is the starter. might as well get behind that and support him. Bo has said on multiple occasions that green isn't ready to start. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.