GBRsal Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 Yes i'd much rather we'd stayed put and waited to see what new and interesting ways texico came up with to screw us over, and then had nowhere to go when the texas 12 finally dies. Quote Link to comment
Lil' Red Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 I like and agree with the move and am looking forward to joining the Big Ten but I'll still miss some of our Big 12 opponents. Quote Link to comment
Ringer02 Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles It's done, deal with it. and the traveling won't be that much different only instead of traveling to half sold 40'00 seat stadiums, we'll be going to 70-110,000 full colosseums Quote Link to comment
corncraze Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 location is a big problem in my book. Dude we have a team jet!!!! Quote Link to comment
redbeerman Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 i still don,t like nu joining the big 10, allways hated he big 10....playing ohio state, penn state, they are eastern schools, location is a big problem in my book. i will go never like the move , regardless of osborn, etc....it was about money, nothing eles State College, PA is about 250 miles farther then Austin, TX. That is about 1/2 hour in a jet. Nebraska had to make a decision. They made the best decision they could for a host of reasons. You don't have to like it. Quote Link to comment
Spartness Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 I must admit I wasn't that crazy about the Big 10 and initially had a negative feeling when I first heard about the possible move. But to be honest with you, I did not have any good reasons, like the poster, for my past feeling for the Big 10. Once I understood the whole story about how it will help NU academically and perhaps Nebraska's economy, I was in. I have had the impression in comparing the Big 10 to the Big 12 South Division, that the Big 12 South had more speed overall. But even though OSU looked slower against LSU in that NC game a few years ago, they did defeat Miami in that NC game some years back. One out of three isn't too bad. With Pelini making Nebraska into a fast team again, like Osborne's later teams, that maybe would help inspire more Big 10 teams to get faster -- but I think the Big 10 teams are already improving on that. 1 Quote Link to comment
corncraze Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 I must admit I wasn't that crazy about the Big 10 and initially had a negative feeling when I first heard about the possible move. But to be honest with you, I did not have any good reasons, like the poster, for my past feeling for the Big 10. Once I understood the whole story about how it will help NU academically and perhaps Nebraska's economy, I was in. I have had the impression in comparing the Big 10 to the Big 12 South Division, that the Big 12 South had more speed overall. But even though OSU looked slower against LSU in that NC game a few years ago, they did defeat Miami in that NC game some years back. One out of three isn't too bad. With Pelini making Nebraska into a fast team again, like Osborne's later teams, that maybe would help inspire more Big 10 teams to get faster -- but I think the Big 10 teams are already improving on that. Michigan is also supposedly getting faster with RichRod's spread ... that's if he stays though But I agree I used to always see it as a slow conference, but maybe that's cause I stereotyped the Big 10 Quote Link to comment
Never Skerd' Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 when you remove money as a factor, I would say I find the Big 12 much, much more appealing. Quote Link to comment
Spartness Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 when you remove money as a factor, I would say I find the Big 12 much, much more appealing. More appealing academically? More appealing economically for the state of Nebraska? ?????????? Quote Link to comment
corncraze Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 when you remove money as a factor, I would say I find the Big 12 much, much more appealing. Oppressive Texas is appealing Quote Link to comment
Touchdown Tommie Posted July 5, 2010 Share Posted July 5, 2010 Getting down on our knees to Texas like the rest of the Big XII did is the last thing that I would have wanted to happen. The crap that they pulled to get their way is ridiculous. I was talking with an OU fan and he is pissed that OU gave in...they are getting more than the rest of the chumps that stayed. Like Tubberville said, it is only a matter of time before they fold and it will be on Texas because of their we are better than everyone else attitude. I am excited for the move. Some of my excitement is selfish since I do live in Big Ten country, but after that excitement went away, I completely see what TO made the move and it made perfect sense. It will take some time to get use to the move, but I do think it was in the best interest of NU....for academics and athletics. Quote Link to comment
VprHis Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 ... I have had the impression in comparing the Big 10 to the Big 12 South Division, that the Big 12 South had more speed overall. But even though OSU looked slower against LSU in that NC game a few years ago, they did defeat Miami in that NC game some years back. One out of three isn't too bad. With Pelini making Nebraska into a fast team again, like Osborne's later teams, that maybe would help inspire more Big 10 teams to get faster -- but I think the Big 10 teams are already improving on that. On behalf of buckeye nation, I'd appreciate it if you'd never again refer to LSU, the SEC, or anything that could cause us to remember that they exist--at least as far as bowl games are concerned. We're just fine in the regular season, but that's not as interesting. Thanks a bunch. I'm going to my happy place now. Quote Link to comment
1995 Huskers Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 The Huskers own the SEC lol Quote Link to comment
bshirt Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 How about the fact that we are no longer in a conference that can be held hostage by one school. If the big 12 had accpeted the big 8 history, if the conference were ran fairly, and if there was equal revenue sharing. I would also appose the move, but since none of those happened. I'm all for the move 100% correct. The BigXII could have been the best. But sadly.... Quote Link to comment
irafreak Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 I must admit I wasn't that crazy about the Big 10 and initially had a negative feeling when I first heard about the possible move. But to be honest with you, I did not have any good reasons, like the poster, for my past feeling for the Big 10. Once I understood the whole story about how it will help NU academically and perhaps Nebraska's economy, I was in. I have had the impression in comparing the Big 10 to the Big 12 South Division, that the Big 12 South had more speed overall. But even though OSU looked slower against LSU in that NC game a few years ago, they did defeat Miami in that NC game some years back. One out of three isn't too bad. With Pelini making Nebraska into a fast team again, like Osborne's later teams, that maybe would help inspire more Big 10 teams to get faster -- but I think the Big 10 teams are already improving on that. Michigan is also supposedly getting faster with RichRod's spread ... that's if he stays though But I agree I used to always see it as a slow conference, but maybe that's cause I stereotyped the Big 10 Yeah the first thing that popped into my mind when Ted Ginn Jr scored that opening kickoff against florida was....it's only a matter of time before those blazing fast florida players take over this game... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.