Nexus Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 22. Alfonzo Dennard 33. Jared Crick 96. Lavonte David 140. Jermarcus Hardrick 155. Baker Steinkuhler LINK Quote Link to comment
talaricohusker Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I expect crick to climb as soon as the season starts but not bad i hope that thier stock rises as the season wears on Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 I expect crick to climb as soon as the season starts but not bad i hope that thier stock rises as the season wears on Mel Kiper has Crick listed #22. He seems to be a mid-to-late 1st round projection on various mock draft boards so far. Quote Link to comment
talaricohusker Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I expect crick to climb as soon as the season starts but not bad i hope that thier stock rises as the season wears on Mel Kiper has Crick listed #22. He seems to be a mid-to-late 1st round projection on various mock draft boards so far. They are saying he had a "down" year last year given that he was in the shadow of suh but i am sure he will be better this year. I hope that injury he had in the spring wont hinder him this fall Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Brandon Kinnie's size could put him into the top 150 if his production increases this season. Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 I expect crick to climb as soon as the season starts but not bad i hope that thier stock rises as the season wears on Mel Kiper has Crick listed #22. He seems to be a mid-to-late 1st round projection on various mock draft boards so far. They are saying he had a "down" year last year given that he was in the shadow of suh but i am sure he will be better this year. I hope that injury he had in the spring wont hinder him this fall Really? I'm curious to know who said that? The reason I ask is the few "talking heads" I've read praised Crick's 2010 performance by saying he's legit since he basically matched his 2009 performance without Suh by his side. Quote Link to comment
n.e.husker Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Whats Baker doing on this list? Nothing against him, i just havent seen it in him thus far in his career. This being his Junior year. Quote Link to comment
PaulCrewe Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Whats Baker doing on this list? Nothing against him, i just havent seen it in him thus far in his career. This being his Junior year. I can see Baker on the list a heck of a lot quicker than Yoshi. Yes Yosh has an NFL frame, but what has he done that has been overly impressive. Baker's motor and play seemed to grow as the year went on, and with two more years very easily could become Suh3.0/Crick 2.0. Of course Chase Rome could come in and blow him out of the water as well, something completely hypothetical much like a stupid mock draft board 11 months away. Quote Link to comment
Fuzzy Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I expected to see Burkhead at least somewhere on that list. Quote Link to comment
irieboy8 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I expected to see Burkhead at least somewhere on that list. whatever reason we all have for wanting our questioning the guys on the list or wish some guys need to be added i think its f'ing awesome we are putting out soo much NFL talent especially on the D side of the ball... kids see this and are noticing it Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt316 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 While it's a very unofficial list it does sort of show the disparity in the B12 and B10 on a talent level. B10 Top 25 1 Top 50 4 Top 100 11 Top 150 19 Top 200 27 B12 Top 25 3 Top 50 8 Top 100 13 Top 150 18 Top200 24 Taking Nebraska out of the equation, The Number of draft prospects are very similar, but the top end elite kids are found in the Big 12 far more than the Big Ten. One of the big reasons why I think this year's schedule is FAR easier than last years. Also find it interesting that the first Texas kid on the list is way down at #109. Nice talent development Mack. Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 @ Blackshirts316 The flipside to this is if you look at the draft numbers from the previous decade (2000-2009) as a whole then B1G beats Big 12 even with one less team member. Nebraska and Colorado counts towards the Big 12 in these figures while the B1G and Pac-10 reflects only 11 and 10 teams respectively. The first number is the total number of NFL players drafted. The second number reflects 1st rounders drafted. ACC = 395 ... 79 B1G = 385 ... 59 Big 12 = 316 ... 50 Big East = 165 ... 16 Pac-10 = 331 ... 41 SEC = 451 ... 73 LINK Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt316 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 @ Blackshirts316 The flipside to this is if you look at the draft numbers from the previous decade (2000-2009) as a whole then B1G beats Big 12 even with one less team member. Nebraska and Colorado counts towards the Big 12 in these figures while the B1G and Pac-10 reflects only 11 and 10 teams respectively. The first number is the total number of NFL players drafted. The second number reflects 1st rounders drafted. ACC = 395 ... 79 B1G = 385 ... 59 Big 12 = 316 ... 50 Big East = 165 ... 16 Pac-10 = 331 ... 41 SEC = 451 ... 73 LINK Great data. It does make me think a bit more about it. Though I am thinking, just with my eyeball test and no data at all to back it up that if the data were done we'd find that the separation would really be found in round 2-4 not so much round 1. I'd think the B12 had far more guys taken in the 2-4 rounds than the Big Ten and the Big Ten had more guys taken in round 4-6 than the B12. With fairly even numbers at the top and low end. Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 @ Blackshirts316 The flipside to this is if you look at the draft numbers from the previous decade (2000-2009) as a whole then B1G beats Big 12 even with one less team member. Nebraska and Colorado counts towards the Big 12 in these figures while the B1G and Pac-10 reflects only 11 and 10 teams respectively. The first number is the total number of NFL players drafted. The second number reflects 1st rounders drafted. ACC = 395 ... 79 B1G = 385 ... 59 Big 12 = 316 ... 50 Big East = 165 ... 16 Pac-10 = 331 ... 41 SEC = 451 ... 73 LINK Great data. It does make me think a bit more about it. Though I am thinking, just with my eyeball test and no data at all to back it up that if the data were done we'd find that the separation would really be found in round 2-4 not so much round 1. I'd think the B12 had far more guys taken in the 2-4 rounds than the Big Ten and the Big Ten had more guys taken in round 4-6 than the B12. With fairly even numbers at the top and low end. It'd be nice to see a concise breakdown for each round as you suggest for a fuller perspective. I'm not sure a ready-made list exists online, but I know I'm not going to be the guy to attempt it. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Whats Baker doing on this list? Nothing against him, i just havent seen it in him thus far in his career. This being his Junior year. I can see Baker on the list a heck of a lot quicker than Yoshi. Yes Yosh has an NFL frame, but what has he done that has been overly impressive. Baker's motor and play seemed to grow as the year went on, and with two more years very easily could become Suh3.0/Crick 2.0. Of course Chase Rome could come in and blow him out of the water as well, something completely hypothetical much like a stupid mock draft board 11 months away. Todd Peat, Chase Rome, and Kevin Williams all have potential to do what Crick/Suh did. We are quickly becoming defensive lineman university, and I like it. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.