Occupy Wall Street

[johnnyrodgers20]

And the great thing about this country is you are allowed to have that right. Just like I am allowed think it is simply sad that someone likes Bernie Sanders or BO or Rachel Maddow or Debbie Wasserman Schultz!!

 

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

Who in the US national media is more accurate than Maddow?

 

Do you find it sad that some people like to hear the truth?

 

 

 

BTW... Maddow is the only one I watch on MSNBC, and I don't read the Huffington Compost at all.

 

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

[johnnyrodgers20]

So tell me about Rachel Maddow. All I know of her is from appearances on The Daily Show and Colbert. I just figured she was the Liberal version of Ann Coulter. Yes? No?

 

As I've said a few times here, I find here to be factually objective, as well as biased in opinion to the left.

 

Everyone has their biases, but few work well with facts.

I would mostly agree with this.

 

I think a lot of people on the right especially despise her because she is openly gay.

 

Yeah it can't be because she is an uber liberal and is very biased that way!!

[johnnyrodgers20]

Plus . . . this guy admits to liking/watching Hannity and he mocks HuffPo? Sometime we should try to get the pot into the same room as the kettle.

 

The irony is thick, isn't it?

Some might even call it hypocrisy.

 

 

So Sub likes Maddow and hates Hannity and the hypocrisy is with the conservative. I get the vibe of this site!! And a rational person will see the true hypocrisy.

[carlfense]

And for the record, MSNBC (or whomever the left-wing jackdaw is) is full of derp, too.

 

I will take Rachel Maddow as being more truthful and accurate than the rest of the mainstream news presenters.

I would tend to agree that she is generally more factually accurate than someone like Sean Hannity but she certainly leans a certain way with her coverage. She enjoys attacking conservatives and is almost defensive when forced to cover a liberal issue in a negative light.

 

So how is Hannity not as factual as Maddow? Where has he misled his viewers with information? Any examples?

http://mediamatters....ch/200812170007

 

Here is a fairly comprehensive list from 2008. Yes, it's from Media Matters. Every single blurb is supported by sources and videos. Check it out.

 

Also, I would agree with knapplc that it is simply sad that someone likes Hannity.

 

 

And the great thing about this country is you are allowed to have that right. Just like I am allowed think it is simply sad that someone likes Bernie Sanders or BO or Rachel Maddow or Debbie Wasserman Schultz!!

I would say that I enjoy watching 1 of those 4 and would vote for 1 of them vs. the current alternatives.

 

 

So you are basically a left leaning Dem or a socialist. And you enjoy Rachel Maddow that explains alot!! Sad really!!

Guess again.

[carlfense]

Plus . . . this guy admits to liking/watching Hannity and he mocks HuffPo? Sometime we should try to get the pot into the same room as the kettle.

 

The irony is thick, isn't it?

Some might even call it hypocrisy.

 

 

So Sub likes Maddow and hates Hannity and the hypocrisy is with the conservative. I get the vibe of this site!! And a rational person will see the true hypocrisy.

The hypocrisy is in accusing someone of getting their news from a biased news source when you openly admit to watching and enjoying Sean Hannity.

 

Come on jr20. We can walk you through this if need be.

[carlfense]

So tell me about Rachel Maddow. All I know of her is from appearances on The Daily Show and Colbert. I just figured she was the Liberal version of Ann Coulter. Yes? No?

 

As I've said a few times here, I find here to be factually objective, as well as biased in opinion to the left.

 

Everyone has their biases, but few work well with facts.

I would mostly agree with this.

 

I think a lot of people on the right especially despise her because she is openly gay.

 

Yeah it can't be because she is an uber liberal and is very biased that way!!

OK. So you're cool with the gays and gay marriage?

[johnnyrodgers20]

Plus . . . this guy admits to liking/watching Hannity and he mocks HuffPo? Sometime we should try to get the pot into the same room as the kettle.

 

The irony is thick, isn't it?

Some might even call it hypocrisy.

 

 

So Sub likes Maddow and hates Hannity and the hypocrisy is with the conservative. I get the vibe of this site!! And a rational person will see the true hypocrisy.

The hypocrisy is in accusing someone of getting their news from a biased news source when you openly admit to watching and enjoying Sean Hannity.

 

Come on jr20. We can walk you through this if need be.

 

 

Wait a minute and think about it. I have never said Hannity was not biased you must have just assumed that. Look back and read the thread!! I never said he is my only news source you just assumed that. Hannity and Maddow are news analysts and they give opinions If you ever read HP you would know I have said that forever. I also said one of the reasons I enjoy Hannity is because there are good debates. Have you ever seen Hannity and Beckel go at it. A lot better than Maddow asking softball questions and giggling all show!!

[knapplc]

I never said he is my only news source you just assumed that.

 

So what are your news sources?

[johnnyrodgers20]

So tell me about Rachel Maddow. All I know of her is from appearances on The Daily Show and Colbert. I just figured she was the Liberal version of Ann Coulter. Yes? No?

 

As I've said a few times here, I find here to be factually objective, as well as biased in opinion to the left.

 

Everyone has their biases, but few work well with facts.

I would mostly agree with this.

 

I think a lot of people on the right especially despise her because she is openly gay.

 

Yeah it can't be because she is an uber liberal and is very biased that way!!

OK. So you're cool with the gays and gay marriage?

 

I am cool with gays as far as gay marriage - NO! I am in favor of civil unions so there signifacnt other may get benefits and such for legal reasons!!

[knapplc]

I am cool with gays as far as gay marriage

 

That's very progressive of you.

[carlfense]

Plus . . . this guy admits to liking/watching Hannity and he mocks HuffPo? Sometime we should try to get the pot into the same room as the kettle.

 

The irony is thick, isn't it?

Some might even call it hypocrisy.

 

 

So Sub likes Maddow and hates Hannity and the hypocrisy is with the conservative. I get the vibe of this site!! And a rational person will see the true hypocrisy.

The hypocrisy is in accusing someone of getting their news from a biased news source when you openly admit to watching and enjoying Sean Hannity.

 

Come on jr20. We can walk you through this if need be.

 

 

Wait a minute and think about it. I have never said Hannity was not biased you must have just assumed that. Look back and read the thread!! I never said he is my only news source you just assumed that. Hannity and Maddow are news analysts and they give opinions If you ever read HP you would know I have said that forever. I also said one of the reasons I enjoy Hannity is because there are good debates. Have you ever seen Hannity and Beckel go at it. A lot better than Maddow asking softball questions and giggling all show!!

So . . . let's lay this out there.

1. You admit that Hannity is biased and that you get news from him. (I never said he was your only news source.)

2. You accuse others of getting news from a biased source like the Huffington Post.

3. You see no irony or hypocrisy in that.

4. I see that as a softball and giggle about it. (To steal your line.)

[carlfense]

So tell me about Rachel Maddow. All I know of her is from appearances on The Daily Show and Colbert. I just figured she was the Liberal version of Ann Coulter. Yes? No?

 

As I've said a few times here, I find here to be factually objective, as well as biased in opinion to the left.

 

Everyone has their biases, but few work well with facts.

I would mostly agree with this.

 

I think a lot of people on the right especially despise her because she is openly gay.

 

Yeah it can't be because she is an uber liberal and is very biased that way!!

OK. So you're cool with the gays and gay marriage?

 

I am cool with gays as far as gay marriage - NO! I am in favor of civil unions so there signifacnt other may get benefits and such for legal reasons!!

Why not marriage? Are you advocating for a "separate but equal" civil union?

[carlfense]

I am cool with gays as far as gay marriage

 

That's very progressive of you.

Borderline socialist.

[johnnyrodgers20]

I never said he is my only news source you just assumed that.

 

So what are your news sources?

My news sources are ABC news and Fox news with Shepard Smith. I watch Hannity and O'Reilly, Maddow and Oberman (All analysts not news reporters!!). I don't get a lot of time though I am busy with my two kids and rarely see them all for more than five or ten minutes.

[johnnyrodgers20]

I am cool with gays as far as gay marriage

 

That's very progressive of you.

I love you condescending tone. It is enjoyable to see your self righteous approval, so we are accepted into this site if we tow the liberal line, Brilliant!!