Occupy Wall Street

[formercactusboy]

seriously, this banter is going back and forth. it's not just the pubs that are doing it. it's not just those who aren't libs that aren't doing it.

 

this comment wasn't from johnny: Typically, children shed their dependence on moral absolutes for definitions somewhere between the second and fourth grades--it's part of the typical self-maturation and education process.So I guess we should be glad that the 'baggers have gotten in touch with their inner-children?

 

how about a little fairness?

[johnnyrodgers20]

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that johnnyrodgers20 is trolling. There is no discourse here, just random nonsense spewed forth, with a smiley tacked on at the end for good measure.

 

And you would come to that I have been adding more than others but I am sure Yos and I are not popular on this site!!

[formercactusboy]

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that johnnyrodgers20 is trolling. There is no discourse here, just random nonsense spewed forth, with a smiley tacked on at the end for good measure.

 

And you would come to that I have been adding mor ethan others but I am sure Yos and I are not ppopular on this site!!

 

I think the problem is, several from HP began complaining to the mods as soon as some of the other HPers came aboard. the complaints included taking issue with SNs and taking issue with pubs among other things.

[knapplc]

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that johnnyrodgers20 is trolling. There is no discourse here, just random nonsense spewed forth, with a smiley tacked on at the end for good measure.

 

And you would come to that I have been adding more than others but I am sure Yos and I are not popular on this site!!

 

You are not Yossarian and you are not held accountable for his actions. You are held accountable for yours.

[johnnyrodgers20]

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that johnnyrodgers20 is trolling. There is no discourse here, just random nonsense spewed forth, with a smiley tacked on at the end for good measure.

 

And you would come to that I have been adding more than others but I am sure Yos and I are not popular on this site!!

 

You are not Yossarian and you are not held accountable for his actions. You are held accountable for yours.

 

Well, then hold me accountable!! I have been having debates with carl and others show me where I was trolling!! He would say something and I would try to refute it. I would say something and he would try to refute it. What am I missing?

[knapplc]

What are your moral absolutes?

 

What are yours?

 

Here's an example. You did the same thing to me earlier.

[formercactusboy]

so not answering someone's direct question is trolling? Or is asking them to answer it first the trolling?

 

[johnnyrodgers20]

That is because I am not going to get into the pissing match of ideals. I wil say mine he will try to argue his and we will get nowhere. There are absolutes in this world just liberals don't want to hear it. And I don't feel like explaining every minute point. You can tell Carl is a lawyer because every word is dissected and analyzed.

[knapplc]

That is because I am not going to get into the pissing match of ideals. I wil say mine he will try to argue his and we will get nowhere. There are absolutes in this world just liberals don't want to hear it. And I don't feel like explaining every minute point. You can tell Carl is a lawyer because every word is dissected and analyzed.

 

Yes, Carl tends to do that. And this was a very real, constructive post from you. This is the kind of contribution that helps the conversation, although I have to say that this incessant "liberal" drumbeat is misplaced.

 

All we want is a board with conversations. Engage in the conversation, just like you did in the quote above, and you'll be fine.

[johnnyrodgers20]

And for the record, MSNBC (or whomever the left-wing jackdaw is) is full of derp, too.

 

I will take Rachel Maddow as being more truthful and accurate than the rest of the mainstream news presenters.

 

A little insight in to the way Rachel operates as well. you seem to like to show Hannity's misinformation

 

http://jivinjehoshap...inaccurate.html

[johnnyrodgers20]

That is because I am not going to get into the pissing match of ideals. I wil say mine he will try to argue his and we will get nowhere. There are absolutes in this world just liberals don't want to hear it. And I don't feel like explaining every minute point. You can tell Carl is a lawyer because every word is dissected and analyzed.

 

Yes, Carl tends to do that. And this was a very real, constructive post from you. This is the kind of contribution that helps the conversation, although I have to say that this incessant "liberal" drumbeat is misplaced.

 

All we want is a board with conversations. Engage in the conversation, just like you did in the quote above, and you'll be fine.

 

Seriously I have been doing that!! I don't know what you have been reading. We had almost a page on the perks congress feels they are entitled to. did you read that? I gave links and my opinion much like carl did.

 

then you have posters who come in here talk about about how tea baggers are getting in touch with their inner child and not one constructive word in that post and was he called a troller, not on the public forum he wasn't.

[knapplc]

Do you feel the Tea Party needs defending on this forum?

[Sub-Husker]

And for the record, MSNBC (or whomever the left-wing jackdaw is) is full of derp, too.

 

I will take Rachel Maddow as being more truthful and accurate than the rest of the mainstream news presenters.

 

A little insight in to the way Rachel operates as well. you seem to like to show Hannity's misinformation

 

http://jivinjehoshap...inaccurate.html

 

Can you be a bit more specific on the charge, rathing than dropping a link to a vague story like a turd?

 

Thanks!

[johnnyrodgers20]

And by the way I did read many of Hannity's innaccuracies. And I don't have time to go through them all but I would say I can see why some think he is misinforming the public. Some can be argued and some I have questions about. There are just so many that it would take weeks so I guess to each his own, I have found quite a few on Maddow but I expected that. They are anlaysts as I have said and they have an agenda that is just the way it is in this country.

[carlfense]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

You're trying to explain something in shades of gray to someone who sees a label next to a name and assumes that they are Hitler.

 

Socialist=Evil. (Also, Democratic Party=Socialist=evil.)

 

Hard to reason with that type of logic.

 

Typically, children shed their dependence on moral absolutes for definitions somewhere between the second and fourth grades--it's part of the typical self-maturation and education process.

 

So I guess we should be glad that the 'baggers have gotten in touch with their inner-children?

 

Typically the immature name calling is over around the same time. Abandon moral absolutes is the usual lib game plan for people who are immoral and want to do whatever deviant behavior they deem fit without retribution.

What are your moral absolutes?

 

What are yours?

I live with few absolutes because I realize that our world is one of shades of gray rather than black and white.

 

I was just curious because your statement about moral absolutes led me to believe that you have some well defined absolutes. I was interested because I've seen few so called moral absolutes that do not have obvious exceptions.