Occupy Wall Street

[johnnyrodgers20]

I am cool with gays as far as gay marriage

 

That's very progressive of you.

Borderline socialist.

 

Watch it those are grounds for a suspension!!

[johnnyrodgers20]

So tell me about Rachel Maddow. All I know of her is from appearances on The Daily Show and Colbert. I just figured she was the Liberal version of Ann Coulter. Yes? No?

 

As I've said a few times here, I find here to be factually objective, as well as biased in opinion to the left.

 

Everyone has their biases, but few work well with facts.

I would mostly agree with this.

 

I think a lot of people on the right especially despise her because she is openly gay.

 

Yeah it can't be because she is an uber liberal and is very biased that way!!

OK. So you're cool with the gays and gay marriage?

 

I am cool with gays as far as gay marriage - NO! I am in favor of civil unions so there signifacnt other may get benefits and such for legal reasons!!

Why not marriage? Are you advocating for a "separate but equal" civil union?

 

 

Very simple that is my belief. You obviously don't agree but I obviously don't agree with you. I guess we may be able to agree to disagree!!

[carlfense]

Very simple that is my belief. You obviously don't agree but I obviously don't agree with you. I guess we may be able to agree to disagree!!

Is your belief based on anything? Or is it just an article of faith?

[Sub-Husker]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

[carlfense]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

You're trying to explain something in shades of gray to someone who sees a label next to a name and assumes that they are Hitler.

 

Socialist=Evil. (Also, Democratic Party=Socialist=evil.)

 

Hard to reason with that type of logic.

[johnnyrodgers20]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

You're trying to explain something in shades of gray to someone who sees a label next to a name and assumes that they are Hitler.

 

Socialist=Evil. (Also, Democratic Party=Socialist=evil.)

 

Hard to reason with that type of logic.

 

We are the exact oppostie of each other. Kinda like a yin yang!!

[johnnyrodgers20]

Plus . . . this guy admits to liking/watching Hannity and he mocks HuffPo? Sometime we should try to get the pot into the same room as the kettle.

 

The irony is thick, isn't it?

Some might even call it hypocrisy.

 

 

So Sub likes Maddow and hates Hannity and the hypocrisy is with the conservative. I get the vibe of this site!! And a rational person will see the true hypocrisy.

The hypocrisy is in accusing someone of getting their news from a biased news source when you openly admit to watching and enjoying Sean Hannity.

 

Come on jr20. We can walk you through this if need be.

 

 

Wait a minute and think about it. I have never said Hannity was not biased you must have just assumed that. Look back and read the thread!! I never said he is my only news source you just assumed that. Hannity and Maddow are news analysts and they give opinions If you ever read HP you would know I have said that forever. I also said one of the reasons I enjoy Hannity is because there are good debates. Have you ever seen Hannity and Beckel go at it. A lot better than Maddow asking softball questions and giggling all show!!

So . . . let's lay this out there.

1. You admit that Hannity is biased and that you get news from him. (I never said he was your only news source.)

2. You accuse others of getting news from a biased source like the Huffington Post.

3. You see no irony or hypocrisy in that.

4. I see that as a softball and giggle about it. (To steal your line.)

 

 

I didn't accuse anyone of anything I asked if he reads the huffington post. I am showing you you are the hypocrite. I never said that you can't get news from the Huffiington post. You are the ones with the bashing of me for Hannity and I pointed out that you guys get your news sources from very biased sources also!! you have this completely backwards I am saying don't bash me because I like Hannity when you guys watch Maddow, Oberman, read the Huffington post, NYtimes etc.

[carlfense]

Plus . . . this guy admits to liking/watching Hannity and he mocks HuffPo? Sometime we should try to get the pot into the same room as the kettle.

 

The irony is thick, isn't it?

Some might even call it hypocrisy.

 

 

So Sub likes Maddow and hates Hannity and the hypocrisy is with the conservative. I get the vibe of this site!! And a rational person will see the true hypocrisy.

The hypocrisy is in accusing someone of getting their news from a biased news source when you openly admit to watching and enjoying Sean Hannity.

 

Come on jr20. We can walk you through this if need be.

 

 

Wait a minute and think about it. I have never said Hannity was not biased you must have just assumed that. Look back and read the thread!! I never said he is my only news source you just assumed that. Hannity and Maddow are news analysts and they give opinions If you ever read HP you would know I have said that forever. I also said one of the reasons I enjoy Hannity is because there are good debates. Have you ever seen Hannity and Beckel go at it. A lot better than Maddow asking softball questions and giggling all show!!

So . . . let's lay this out there.

1. You admit that Hannity is biased and that you get news from him. (I never said he was your only news source.)

2. You accuse others of getting news from a biased source like the Huffington Post.

3. You see no irony or hypocrisy in that.

4. I see that as a softball and giggle about it. (To steal your line.)

 

 

I didn't accuse anyone of anything I asked if he reads the huffington post. I am showing you you are the hypocrite. I never said that you can't get news from the Huffiington post. You are the ones with the bashing of me for Hannity and I pointed out that you guys get your news sources from very biased sources also!! you have this completely backwards I am saying don't bash me because I like Hannity when you guys watch Maddow, Oberman, read the Huffington post, NYtimes etc.

I've seen probably a grand total of 45 minutes of Maddow's show. I've probably seen about twice that amount of Hannity . . . out of morbid curiosity. I really don't watch much TV besides football.

 

I haven't read the HuffPost in years. I read the occasional NYtimes article . . . probably 1-2 every week. My RSS feed undoubtedly works as well as knapplcs.

 

Also, you still don't seem to understand what I'm saying about your behavior. If you don't get it by this point I fear that you never will. Godspeed.

[Cactusboy]

[formercactusboy]

[VectorVictor]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

You're trying to explain something in shades of gray to someone who sees a label next to a name and assumes that they are Hitler.

 

Socialist=Evil. (Also, Democratic Party=Socialist=evil.)

 

Hard to reason with that type of logic.

 

Typically, children shed their dependence on moral absolutes for definitions somewhere between the second and fourth grades--it's part of the typical self-maturation and education process.

 

So I guess we should be glad that the 'baggers have gotten in touch with their inner-children?

[johnnyrodgers20]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

You're trying to explain something in shades of gray to someone who sees a label next to a name and assumes that they are Hitler.

 

Socialist=Evil. (Also, Democratic Party=Socialist=evil.)

 

Hard to reason with that type of logic.

 

Typically, children shed their dependence on moral absolutes for definitions somewhere between the second and fourth grades--it's part of the typical self-maturation and education process.

 

So I guess we should be glad that the 'baggers have gotten in touch with their inner-children?

 

Typically the immature name calling is over around the same time. Abandon moral absolutes is the usual lib game plan for people who are immoral and want to do whatever deviant behavior they deem fit without retribution.

[carlfense]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

You're trying to explain something in shades of gray to someone who sees a label next to a name and assumes that they are Hitler.

 

Socialist=Evil. (Also, Democratic Party=Socialist=evil.)

 

Hard to reason with that type of logic.

 

Typically, children shed their dependence on moral absolutes for definitions somewhere between the second and fourth grades--it's part of the typical self-maturation and education process.

 

So I guess we should be glad that the 'baggers have gotten in touch with their inner-children?

 

Typically the immature name calling is over around the same time. Abandon moral absolutes is the usual lib game plan for people who are immoral and want to do whatever deviant behavior they deem fit without retribution.

What are your moral absolutes?

[johnnyrodgers20]

Can you cite an inaccuracy from Senator Sanders?

 

I didn't say Bernie had lied but it is sad you prefer to like a socialist.

 

I'm glad that you didn't say that, because you'd have a hard time finding something erroneous.

 

What do you know about the record and history of Senator Sanders?

 

He has bee great for local businesses, but not the big corporations that are raping and looting this nation.

 

It's truly sad that you have sided against Sanders.

You're trying to explain something in shades of gray to someone who sees a label next to a name and assumes that they are Hitler.

 

Socialist=Evil. (Also, Democratic Party=Socialist=evil.)

 

Hard to reason with that type of logic.

 

Typically, children shed their dependence on moral absolutes for definitions somewhere between the second and fourth grades--it's part of the typical self-maturation and education process.

 

So I guess we should be glad that the 'baggers have gotten in touch with their inner-children?

 

Typically the immature name calling is over around the same time. Abandon moral absolutes is the usual lib game plan for people who are immoral and want to do whatever deviant behavior they deem fit without retribution.

What are your moral absolutes?

 

What are yours?

[knapplc]

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that johnnyrodgers20 is trolling. There is no discourse here, just random nonsense spewed forth, with a smiley tacked on at the end for good measure.