Spooky Tooth Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah 1 Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I would love to have, Delano Hill Rivals 4 star Ht 6 foot Wt 198 40. 4.44 John Wisnieski Rivals 3 star Ht 6'5 Wt 215 40 4.8 Colin Goebel Rivals 3 star Ht 6'4 Wt 275 40 5.0 Malik Rucker Rivals 3 star Ht 6 foot Wt 175 40 4.48 These would all be needs in our current class and currently are as good as we would get. PS Gotta love Ruckers hair Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Do these guys play any particular positions? 1 Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Do these guys play any particular positions? My apologies Hill Safety Goebel OG Rucker Safety Wisnieski TE Quote Link to comment
caveman99 Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Wisnieski would be N if the staff hadn't slow played him. As it is, I think the staff is happy with the HS player currently verballed and a JUCO TE. If the staff swings and misses on the JUCO, I don't think they take another HS TE. Quote Link to comment
huskerhill Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Wisnieski would be N if the staff hadn't slow played him. As it is, I think the staff is happy with the HS player currently verballed and a JUCO TE. If the staff swings and misses on the JUCO, I don't think they take another HS TE. With the current state of Iowa football, do you think Wisnieski could be an option if, god forbid, Sandland doesn't pick NU? Quote Link to comment
Haspula Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 I would love to have, Delano Hill Rivals 4 star Ht 6 foot Wt 198 40. 4.44 John Wisnieski Rivals 3 star Ht 6'5 Wt 215 40 4.8 Colin Goebel Rivals 3 star Ht 6'4 Wt 275 40 5.0 Malik Rucker Rivals 3 star Ht 6 foot Wt 175 40 4.48 These would all be needs in our current class and currently are as good as we would get. PS Gotta love Ruckers hair We rejected Wisnieski's commitment, FYI source Quote Link to comment
HuskerFowler Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Wisnieski would be N if the staff hadn't slow played him. As it is, I think the staff is happy with the HS player currently verballed and a JUCO TE. If the staff swings and misses on the JUCO, I don't think they take another HS TE. We will probably take Casey Sayles reguardless. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I would love to have, Delano Hill Rivals 4 star Ht 6 foot Wt 198 40. 4.44 John Wisnieski Rivals 3 star Ht 6'5 Wt 215 40 4.8 Colin Goebel Rivals 3 star Ht 6'4 Wt 275 40 5.0 Malik Rucker Rivals 3 star Ht 6 foot Wt 175 40 4.48 These would all be needs in our current class and currently are as good as we would get. PS Gotta love Ruckers hair We rejected Wisnieski's commitment, FYI source I am going to disagree....RSS is full of poo and rose colored glasses. Never get the full picture just the parts that make NU look good. The kid is a solid TE that needs a college weightroom. IMO he and Hart would be a good combo. I am having less and less faith in the Sandland fiasco. You wanna talk about a hold off on being N look no further. Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I would love to have,Delano Hill Rivals 4 star Ht 6 foot Wt 198 40. 4.44 John Wisnieski Rivals 3 star Ht 6'5 Wt 215 40 4.8 Colin Goebel Rivals 3 star Ht 6'4 Wt 275 40 5.0 Malik Rucker Rivals 3 star Ht 6 foot Wt 175 40 4.48 These would all be needs in our current class and currently are as good as we would get. PS Gotta love Ruckers hair Disagree with you saying they are as good as we would get. Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Colin Goebel is a kid we need to be giving a call though. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 What other safety targets are on our radar? I have heard of some dang good CB prospects but not much on the Safety slots. In terms of another TE not named Sandland I think Wisnieski is about as good as we have left on the board. Goebel like you already said would be a nice addition to a depthless OL Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 What other safety targets are on our radar? I have heard of some dang good CB prospects but not much on the Safety slots. In terms of another TE not named Sandland I think Wisnieski is about as good as we have left on the board. Goebel like you already said would be a nice addition to a depthless OL Boaz is a safety target as well as a cb. Boaz is head and shoulders the better athlete. Really like the mean streak and the athleticism of Boaz. He Is very raw yet, but we can afford to take a kid like that with our depth in the secondary. It doesn't appear we have another TE target and it appears the staff is content with that. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Are you content with not taking another TE target? Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I was also under the impression Boaz was more of a CB prospect in our eyes Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.