Jump to content


Interesting take on Michigan


Recommended Posts

Lets beat them!

* The Cornhuskers are No. 2 in the conference in third down defense, allowing opponents to convert just 28.2 percent of the time. Michigan was just 2 of 13 on third downs against MSU.

 

We have to win first down though. Our success on 3rd down is based on not allowing 7 or 8 yards on first down.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

Lets beat them!

* The Cornhuskers are No. 2 in the conference in third down defense, allowing opponents to convert just 28.2 percent of the time. Michigan was just 2 of 13 on third downs against MSU.

We have to win first down though. Our success on 3rd down is based on not allowing 7 or 8 yards on first down.

Yes and no. If we allow 7 or 8 yards on first down they often don't get to third down. :ahhhhhhhh

Link to comment

Lets beat them!

* The Cornhuskers are No. 2 in the conference in third down defense, allowing opponents to convert just 28.2 percent of the time. Michigan was just 2 of 13 on third downs against MSU.

 

We have to win first down though. Our success on 3rd down is based on not allowing 7 or 8 yards on first down.

 

No offense, but...duh?

 

Isn't that the case in football generally.

 

 

Edit: My apologies, that wasn't very nice. Excuse that GSG. My bad.

Link to comment

Lets beat them!

* The Cornhuskers are No. 2 in the conference in third down defense, allowing opponents to convert just 28.2 percent of the time. Michigan was just 2 of 13 on third downs against MSU.

 

We have to win first down though. Our success on 3rd down is based on not allowing 7 or 8 yards on first down.

 

No offense, but...duh?

 

Isn't that the case in football generally.

 

i think your sarcasm meter needs to be adjusted.

Link to comment

Lets beat them!

* The Cornhuskers are No. 2 in the conference in third down defense, allowing opponents to convert just 28.2 percent of the time. Michigan was just 2 of 13 on third downs against MSU.

 

We have to win first down though. Our success on 3rd down is based on not allowing 7 or 8 yards on first down.

 

No offense, but...duh?

 

Isn't that the case in football generally.

 

i think your sarcasm meter needs to be adjusted.

 

Don't mean to be a dick, but I just picked up my dogs poop on the carpet, soft stool. I'm upset. Had to take it out on someone else. :dunno

Link to comment

Lets beat them!

* The Cornhuskers are No. 2 in the conference in third down defense, allowing opponents to convert just 28.2 percent of the time. Michigan was just 2 of 13 on third downs against MSU.

 

We have to win first down though. Our success on 3rd down is based on not allowing 7 or 8 yards on first down.

 

Let's hope we can do some of what MSU did to them. I listened to Borges post game and he wanted to throw on 1st down a lot but his O line was getting crushed!

Link to comment

Neat little history fact between the two teams,

 

Nebraska and Michigan have had similar records throughout the series history when facing each other. This year both teams are 6-2.

 

2012 Neb 5-2 def Mich 5-2

 

2011 Mich 8-2 def Neb 8-2

 

2005 Neb 7-4 def Mich 7-4

 

1911 Neb 5-1-2 def Mich 5-1-2

 

1905 5-0 Mich def 4-0 Neb 31-0

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...