pigsonthewing Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 im the guy who gave it an A. the overall talent and the holes that are being filled are what stood out to me. Coach C. is addressing the issues and trying to win ASAP. Quote Link to comment
Jarred04 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 I am happy with the class. As everyone is saying, we filled the necessary holes. Yes the dropped recruits hurt a bit, but they didn't kill our class. I would have liked to see a QB come out of the class, but i understand the situation. We lacked "flash" players like beck and lucky, but i don't think we are lacking in skill. A good class, now lets put 'em to work!! B+. Quote Link to comment
roadrat Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 I gave the class a B. It filled the depth we need at offensive line and the secondary needs some new blood. Quote Link to comment
Redman Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 I give it a B. Some good weapons at WR. I am excited to see Kenny Wilson run. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 it is hard to grade them before they take the field.........they look pretty good on paper, but it will really take until next year to see what we got...... hunter Quote Link to comment
pigsonthewing Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 if you watched the big red wrapup they had film on some of our low ranked 3 star players. you watch these guys go after the ball and dominate their competition. we got a great class that fills holes with guys with lots of upside Quote Link to comment
TheKiD Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 I'll give it a B as well. We didn't land too many high-profile guys but, we did pick up guys where we needed them, OL/DB. And got what may be a great RB (i'm expecting good things out of wilson). Had some recruiting woes this year.. with a couple decommits. I think we took about the right number of Juco's this year. Next year looks to be prime to go after a high profile HS kids. I'm looking for us to pick up no more than 4-6 juco's, and those will definitely be spot positions that are an immediate need (who knows what they'll be). Quote Link to comment
pigsonthewing Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 I'll give it a B as well. We didn't land too many high-profile guys but, we did pick up guys where we needed them, OL/DB. And got what may be a great RB (i'm expecting good things out of wilson). Had some recruiting woes this year.. with a couple decommits. I think we took about the right number of Juco's this year. Next year looks to be prime to go after a high profile HS kids. I'm looking for us to pick up no more than 4-6 juco's, and those will definitely be spot positions that are an immediate need (who knows what they'll be). Defensive tackle, prolly another DB or two, and maybe another DE. Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Im sure if a good O lineman is available through juco they wont pass him up. Never have enough good lineman. Quote Link to comment
Fat Tire Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Suppose there isn't a way of viewing the highlights of the recruits for free is there??? From Kansas City here and hear they are playing highlights on NETV in Nebraska. Quote Link to comment
Alex 4.0 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 B+. Many of the reasons already mentioned. Star power lacking but who cares, the freshmen all american teams were dominated by 3* players, and i think there were more 2*s than 5*s even... i think the holes were filled, - but DT was a place of need that wasn't wrapped up - along with getting a QB every year. + WR was boosted immensly this year and + we got some talented defensive backs. + Getting a couple offensive linemen was a good thing too, but i think we have a good foundation as far as that goes, Murtha, Patrick, Slauson and so on, dont forget about those guys that RS'd this year (Roark, Picous...i think these guys are still slated to be OL) + We also got ourselves a pretty good TE, who should be able to RS with Herian back and Tomerlin in the mix. Next year we get another Stud QB and RB, along with some defensive linemen. I think next year will be our best class yet, so i am pumped. Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 B+. Many of the reasons already mentioned. Star power lacking but who cares, the freshmen all american teams were dominated by 3* players, and i think there were more 2*s than 5*s even... i think the holes were filled, - but DT was a place of need that wasn't wrapped up - along with getting a QB every year. + WR was boosted immensly this year and + we got some talented defensive backs. + Getting a couple offensive linemen was a good thing too, but i think we have a good foundation as far as that goes, Murtha, Patrick, Slauson and so on, dont forget about those guys that RS'd this year (Roark, Picous...i think these guys are still slated to be OL) + We also got ourselves a pretty good TE, who should be able to RS with Herian back and Tomerlin in the mix. Next year we get another Stud QB and RB, along with some defensive linemen. I think next year will be our best class yet, so i am pumped. I agree with everything you said, except for the grade. I had them at a B. Quote Link to comment
kramer Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 A "B"..........lot to many of our number 1 guys Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.