It'sNotAFakeID Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Checking in @ #16 in the BCS. One behind Michigan State, one in front of Wisconsin and two in front of Michigan. Quote Link to comment
Excel Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 geez talk about Big Ten log jam Quote Link to comment
California Husker Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 A breakdown of conferences in this weeks coaches poll: ACC 4 ranked teams #7,#8,#22,#23 Average ranking: 15 B10 5 ranked teams #21,#18,#16,#13,#12 Average ranking: 16 B12 3 teams ranked #2,#5,#17 Average Ranking: 8 SEC 5 teams ranked #1,#3,#6,#14,#15 Average Ranking: 7.8 P12 2 ranked teams #4,#9 Average Ranking: 6.5 This is a little missleading, this only takes into account the average ranking of the ranked teams. The two conferences with the most ranked teams (B1G and SEC) have 5 each with the lower ranked teams in the B1G pulling down the average. If you figure that the next highest ranked team in the ACC could be no higher than #26 that would bring the average of their top 5 teams down to 17.2. If you figure the BiG XII's top 5 teams with the next highest possible rankings being 26 & 27, that brings their avg. down to 15.4, and using that same concept the highest possible ranking of the top 5 teams in the PAC 12 would be 18.8. 1 Quote Link to comment
ShawnWatson Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 A breakdown of conferences in this weeks coaches poll: ACC 4 ranked teams #7,#8,#22,#23 Average ranking: 15 B10 5 ranked teams #21,#18,#16,#13,#12 Average ranking: 16 B12 3 teams ranked #2,#5,#17 Average Ranking: 8 SEC 5 teams ranked #1,#3,#6,#14,#15 Average Ranking: 7.8 P12 2 ranked teams #4,#9 Average Ranking: 6.5 This is a little missleading, this only takes into account the average ranking of the ranked teams. The two conferences with the most ranked teams (B1G and SEC) have 5 each with the lower ranked teams in the B1G pulling down the average. If you figure that the next highest ranked team in the ACC could be no higher than #26 that would bring the average of their top 5 teams down to 17.2. If you figure the BiG XII's top 5 teams with the next highest possible rankings being 26 & 27, that brings their avg. down to 15.4, and using that same concept the highest possible ranking of the top 5 teams in the PAC 12 would be 18.8. That is all true. I was going to further those stats but I had a glue huffing session that in good conscious I just could not miss. 1 Quote Link to comment
California Husker Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 A breakdown of conferences in this weeks coaches poll: ACC 4 ranked teams #7,#8,#22,#23 Average ranking: 15 B10 5 ranked teams #21,#18,#16,#13,#12 Average ranking: 16 B12 3 teams ranked #2,#5,#17 Average Ranking: 8 SEC 5 teams ranked #1,#3,#6,#14,#15 Average Ranking: 7.8 P12 2 ranked teams #4,#9 Average Ranking: 6.5 This is a little missleading, this only takes into account the average ranking of the ranked teams. The two conferences with the most ranked teams (B1G and SEC) have 5 each with the lower ranked teams in the B1G pulling down the average. If you figure that the next highest ranked team in the ACC could be no higher than #26 that would bring the average of their top 5 teams down to 17.2. If you figure the BiG XII's top 5 teams with the next highest possible rankings being 26 & 27, that brings their avg. down to 15.4, and using that same concept the highest possible ranking of the top 5 teams in the PAC 12 would be 18.8. That is all true. I was going to further those stats but I had a glue huffing session that in good conscious I just could not miss. I guess I can't expect you to skip that Quote Link to comment
nhuskers5 Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Checking in @ #16 in the BCS. One behind Michigan State, one in front of Wisconsin and two in front of Michigan. This makes no sense to me. I know the BCS is run by the computers and such, but being one spot behind a team that has the same record as us, that we also beat face to face is a little ridiculous to me Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Checking in @ #16 in the BCS. One behind Michigan State, one in front of Wisconsin and two in front of Michigan. This makes no sense to me. I know the BCS is run by the computers and such, but being one spot behind a team that has the same record as us, that we also beat face to face is a little ridiculous to me Wisconsin could make the same claim Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 It's irritating seeing Kansas State above us. I know we can't play in two conferences at once but it sucks not being able to knock them off Quote Link to comment
skersfan Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 They played with in 7 points of the number 2 team in the land, we lost to Northwestern. Reality. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 They played with in 7 points of the number 2 team in the land, we lost to Northwestern. Reality. I didn't argue that they shouldn't be ranked above us. I just said it irritated me that we can't play them. That being said, I think we'd win. Quote Link to comment
killer cacti Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Clemson won in OT. No. FG as time expired. Quote Link to comment
Alamo City Husker Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Not having a CCG is only helping the Big 12er's. Or else they would be in the same boat as LSU Alabama. Dammit!!! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.