Minnesota_husker Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I had this in my status update, and enough response was generated that I wanted to take a second to discuss this. I have asked this question elsewhere and more people said Sandusky... Here seems to be Holmes. Both are horrible human beings... Who deserves to be taken off this world faster... You have one bullet... who gets it? Quote Link to comment
huskerenner Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Line em up side by side,shoot them both.Its time to take out the trash! 1 Quote Link to comment
CornHOLIO Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 place Sandusky's junk in Holmes ear? (didn't want to say mouth) and shoot where they make contact Quote Link to comment
CornHOLIO Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 They both appear to be functionally sane, but I'd go with Sandusky. The crime was more personal in that he knew his victims. Quote Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 They both appear to be functionally sane, but I'd go with Sandusky. The crime was more personal in that he knew his victims. His victims are still alive. Holmes victims do not get a chance to heal any wounds they may have suffered. Quote Link to comment
Blackshirts007 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 They both appear to be functionally sane, but I'd go with Sandusky. The crime was more personal in that he knew his victims. His victims are still alive. Holmes victims do not get a chance to heal any wounds they may have suffered. his victims could turn into bigger monsters than both of these two. The trauma they went through, and still go through today is probably unbearable. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I couldn't begin to answer this poll. They're both despicable. How could you choose who was "worse?" Quote Link to comment
Minnesota_husker Posted July 23, 2012 Author Share Posted July 23, 2012 I couldn't begin to answer this poll. They're both despicable. How could you choose who was "worse?" It is a question of how people think. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I couldn't begin to answer this poll. They're both despicable. How could you choose who was "worse?" It is a question of how people think. I gotcha. I just couldn't make a choice. Quote Link to comment
Blackshirts007 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I couldn't begin to answer this poll. They're both despicable. How could you choose who was "worse?" It is a question of how people think. I gotcha. I just couldn't make a choice. who would you rather have babysit your children/grandchildren? Quote Link to comment
Minnesota_husker Posted July 23, 2012 Author Share Posted July 23, 2012 I couldn't begin to answer this poll. They're both despicable. How could you choose who was "worse?" It is a question of how people think. I gotcha. I just couldn't make a choice. If i get one bullet, i put it in Sanduskys face. But i think Holmes is the worse human being because he actually took lives. Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I have one bullet. It is a .50 caliber round fired (obviously) from a Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle. I'm taking this shot from roughly...100 feet away. Sandusky and Holmes are lined up backs together in a straight line from the business end of the rifle. I'm going for the head of one of them, it doesn't matter, they'll both die. They both deserve death. I apologize for the attention to detail, but it is how I feel. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 I couldn't begin to answer this poll. They're both despicable. How could you choose who was "worse?" It is a question of how people think. I gotcha. I just couldn't make a choice. who would you rather have babysit your children/grandchildren? Impossible question to answer. Quote Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 They both appear to be functionally sane, but I'd go with Sandusky. The crime was more personal in that he knew his victims. His victims are still alive. Holmes victims do not get a chance to heal any wounds they may have suffered. his victims could turn into bigger monsters than both of these two. The trauma they went through, and still go through today is probably unbearable. Hypothetical situation. Or they might become teachers or doctors or lawyers or a psychiatrist who helps kids deal with these types of things. They could become anything and you know what, we will find out what they become. We won't find out what Holmes victims become bc he took away their opportunity to become anything... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.