Jump to content


Worth noting....


Comish

Recommended Posts

I understand the agonizing over some of our losses and the roller coaster of performances on a weekly basis.

 

But on the positive side, I think it’s worth noting that just 1 and ½ seasons into the Big 10 conference, we have already defeated ALL of the “traditional” top teams in the league. Ohio St, Michigan, Wisconsin, Michigan St, Penn St, and Iowa. We also have victories over Northwestern and Minnesota and have yet to play traditional bottom feeders Purdue, Illinois and Indiana.

 

For those who wandered about our ability to compete, I’d say the question is well answered.

  • Fire 7
Link to comment


we've also been utterly dominated by 3 of them in that same span of time. we can quietly have a great season if we keep improving - that'll turn us skeptics into optimists for the offseason.

 

Promise?

If we win out, heck ya. The reason most of us are still sitting here questioning this team is because this is the time when Bo's teams have gone into the sh!tter the last coupe of years. If we face Oregon and they kick us to the curb Colorado style I might take this statement back - but as of today we're headed in the right direction.

 

But keep in mind - we're 6-2 right now coming off a big win against Michigan (#21 ranking) - last year we were 7-1 coming off a huge win against Michigan State (#9 ranking). We all know how that ended. The year before that we got to 9-1 with a #9 ranking as well. So let's not all get ahead of ourselves.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

we've also been utterly dominated by 3 of them in that same span of time. we can quietly have a great season if we keep improving - that'll turn us skeptics into optimists for the offseason.

 

Promise?

If we win out, heck ya. The reason most of us are still sitting here questioning this team is because this is the time when Bo's teams have gone into the sh!tter the last coupe of years. If we face Oregon and they kick us to the curb Colorado style I might take this statement back - but as of today we're headed in the right direction.

 

But keep in mind - we're 6-2 right now coming off a big win against Michigan (#21 ranking) - last year we were 7-1 coming off a huge win against Michigan State (#9 ranking). We all know how that ended. The year before that we got to 9-1 with a #9 ranking as well. So let's not all get ahead of ourselves.

Good points, and I agree about not getting ahead of ourselves. Something really feels different about this team though. I can't put my finger on it, but the players are aware of the point you are making, and it seems that they are going to be damn sure that they arent going to buy into their own hype.

Link to comment

To be fair, we beat Michigan and Ohio State with their backup QBs in the game. I realize it's part of the game, but those injuries really turned the tide in our favor.

 

Who cares if they had their backups in, that just shows the better TEAM won the game. A team shouldn't be based off one individual, and if it is, your setting yourself up for doom. They didn't have a their backups ready, thats their fault. Michigan, we would have won that game with Robinson in, we had him well contained, and our offense would have been way more aggressive than they were when he went out.

Link to comment

To be fair, we beat Michigan and Ohio State with their backup QBs in the game. I realize it's part of the game, but those injuries really turned the tide in our favor.

 

Who cares if they had their backups in, that just shows the better TEAM won the game. A team shouldn't be based off one individual, and if it is, your setting yourself up for doom. They didn't have a their backups ready, thats their fault. Michigan, we would have won that game with Robinson in, we had him well contained, and our offense would have been way more aggressive than they were when he went out.

when they generate 68% of the offense it matters a little. the same people that say who cares, are ironically the same that point to martinez's injury as explanation for our 2010 collapse. can't have it both ways. just nice to be on the right end of the deal for a change.

 

(and we had Braxton well contained for about the same period of time...)

Link to comment

Good points, and I agree about not getting ahead of ourselves. Something really feels different about this team though. I can't put my finger on it, but the players are aware of the point you are making, and it seems that they are going to be damn sure that they arent going to buy into their own hype.

Agree. This feels closer to 2009, where we had our bumps early and finished really strong. That's how I felt last year too though :) hahahaha

Link to comment

To be fair, we beat Michigan and Ohio State with their backup QBs in the game. I realize it's part of the game, but those injuries really turned the tide in our favor.

 

Who cares if they had their backups in, that just shows the better TEAM won the game. A team shouldn't be based off one individual, and if it is, your setting yourself up for doom. They didn't have a their backups ready, thats their fault. Michigan, we would have won that game with Robinson in, we had him well contained, and our offense would have been way more aggressive than they were when he went out.

when they generate 68% of the offense it matters a little. the same people that say who cares, are ironically the same that point to martinez's injury as explanation for our 2010 collapse. can't have it both ways. just nice to be on the right end of the deal for a change.

 

(and we had Braxton well contained for about the same period of time...)

 

We didn't have a quality back for Martinez these past two years. He was not 100%, and your QB is your offense. You don't have a QB with leadership skills, and the ability to throw, or run, your set for failure. When that player is 68% of the offense, its not the opposing teams fault they had the advantage of him getting injured. That team should have been better prepared. To use the excuse a player got injured, and that is why we most likely won, is just ridiculous, because you don't know the outcome if he was in the game. Your also wrong about Braxton. We stopped him for the first 15 minutes of the game. We stopped Robinson basically through the whole first half, until he injured himself.

 

Its funny you bring up the OSU game as an example of our failure, but you fail to mention that we had a different scheme coming into the Michigan game, with DIFFERENT players on the field. We had faster, more explosive players, who were given assignments and were well coached. We pressed their WR's, contained rather than bringing pressure, and we used our DB's to stop the run game. Something we did not do against OSU. We relied on our LB's and DL to do the job, with our Safety in zone to help prevent a big run. Same style of defense went into the Northwestern and Michigan game, but the scheme was way different.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...