MichiganDad3 Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 Is Beck's tempo faster than TO's? I remember TO emphasizing that the ball should be snapped with at least 15 seconds on the play clock. Was sending the play in with a receiver and using a quick huddle faster than lining up and looking to the sideline for signals? Quote Link to comment
husker B-rent Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 even if it was faster it takes away from other aspects of the way we do it now. drop down-snap-go. catches the other team more off guard and causes more false start penalties for the other team. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 a much slower tempo, in theory, should keep the defense off the field, provided we can run the ball. Quote Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 a much slower tempo, in theory, should keep the defense off the field, provided we can run the ball. It also gives their defense time to catch their breath. The purpose of the up-tempo offense is to wear the defense down and not let them sub or get their plays in. We saw many times last year how tired the opposing defense was in the fourth quarter. Quote Link to comment
clyde40 Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 I think there's too much emphasis on the pace of the offense anymore. I don't think it's necessary to get on a roll and go no huddle to be successful. That being said I think Beck does a fine job with the tempo. It's not like we're running the Oregon pace the entire game and slows the game down when he needs to. I'm sure a lot of us would slow it down and run out of a huddle more than Beck does, but it's his decision and what he knows. I think Beck takes a lot more heat than what he deserves since his offenses have been so productive. Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 There are times I wish we would go faster. Most of the time TM will walk up to the line, mosey back and then snap it. I guess it keeps them from subbing but it never seems to catch them off guard or unset. Heck when Wyoming went hurry up, they were snapping it much quicker than we were. We are nowhere near Oregon tempo. Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 In the Big Red Breakfast, Beck said the O wanted to go faster to create chaos. This week, practice looked like a Biker Bar per Beck. Unsure what that means, but it sounds better than "we just need to execute"! Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 There are times I wish we would go faster. Most of the time TM will walk up to the line, mosey back and then snap it. I guess it keeps them from subbing but it never seems to catch them off guard or unset. Heck when Wyoming went hurry up, they were snapping it much quicker than we were. We are nowhere near Oregon tempo. Agree with Tempo. Last week, we did not even resemble an offense that had the ability to go uptempo. That's what really stunk. I figured if our D was serviceable (top 50 against the run) our O would be able to hang enough points on anyone to win the game. After last week, the O was Jekyll and Hyde again. I really wish we would excel at what we do great and scrap the rest. Year 3 with the same staff and skill guys, we should easily know what we can do well and what stinks. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 There are times I wish we would go faster. Most of the time TM will walk up to the line, mosey back and then snap it. I guess it keeps them from subbing but it never seems to catch them off guard or unset. Heck when Wyoming went hurry up, they were snapping it much quicker than we were. We are nowhere near Oregon tempo. agree, the way we do hurry up is a morphed version...more like a worry up...for their defense. Quote Link to comment
True2tRA Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 It's pretty obvious if you watch it guys. clearly the coaches don't completely trust Taylor's ability to read a defense. Heck, Taylor might not even trust it himself. The only time we will be Oregon fast is when we are lining up and running it, like the 3rd quarter against Wyoming. If we are going to try to spread it out a bit, it's gonna be delayed a bit. Just the way it is. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 I think Beck's O gets lined up and ready for the snap way faster than any Osborne offense. And that keeps the D from substituting. But Martinez generally changes the play at least once, so the snap isn't much faster at all. Which works to our advantage since it eats time off the clock. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.