dvdcrr Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 This was a sideways move for Nebraska but more importantly it was a lost opportunity. There was no one at the presser from ESPN or Sports Illustrated. In other words we are nationally irrelevant. This hire does nothing to improve that. Nebraska should expect better. We had a chance to really get it going again. Not now. 5 more wasted years. There, I drew a side. Quote Link to comment
RunMickeyRun02 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 I voted 'Yay' Although I must say I don't really see a need to draw lines the same day of his press conference. Quote Link to comment
TheBigRed1 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 This was a sideways move for Nebraska but more importantly it was a lost opportunity. There was no one at the presser from ESPN or Sports Illustrated. In other words we are nationally irrelevant. This hire does nothing to improve that. Nebraska should expect better. We had a chance to really get it going again. Not now. 5 more wasted years. There, I drew a side. Rated the 14th top coach in country by his peers, who know more than you or I about coaching across the spectrum of college football, done more with less (and that is waaaay less) than just about any program in the country playing against power 5 competition(PAC12 considered by many the number 2 conference in the land), turned down HC offers from USC and Alabama and then takes an offer from Nebraska U. Has been all over ESPN programming concerning what's going on in big time college football. Not relevant. Ok. Right time, right job, right man for a very relevant college football program imo and that's all anybodies comments here are, opinions. Quote Link to comment
T_O_Bull Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 I worry about the type of offense he may want to run, but I think he may adapt to his playersMajor concern. All I've heard is that Beck threw too much and that in Lincoln we need a coach that utilizes the power running game, yet we hire a guy that has a history of throwing the ball all over the place and many seem to be ok with it. I don't get it. If you had looked at OSU's stats you may have gotten it 74H. Take a look: Passing Statistics CMP ATT YDS CMP% YDS/A TD INT RAT 290 472 3305 61.4 7.00 15 8 127.4 Rushing Statistics CAR YDS AVG LONG TD 376 1417 3.8 78 19 If your QB's are completing 61.4% of their passes with 7 yds per attempt and 11.4 yds per completion. And your backs are only generating 3.8 yds per carry you'd probably throw the ball too. Riles team threw 55% of the time this year not an even split but it makes sense to me. He's also going to have a lot better talent at running here than he did in Oregon. Voted Yea and am very happy. GBR! T_O_B Quote Link to comment
T_O_Bull Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 I worry about the type of offense he may want to run, but I think he may adapt to his playersMajor concern. All I've heard is that Beck threw too much and that in Lincoln we need a coach that utilizes the power running game, yet we hire a guy that has a history of throwing the ball all over the place and many seem to be ok with it. I don't get it. If you had looked at OSU's stats you may have gotten it 74H. Take a look: Passing Statistics CMP ATT YDS CMP% YDS/A TD INT RAT 290 472 3305 61.4 7.00 15 8 127.4 Rushing Statistics CAR YDS AVG LONG TD 376 1417 3.8 78 19 If your QB's are completing 61.4% of their passes with 7 yds per attempt and 11.4 yds per completion. And your backs are only generating 3.8 yds per carry you'd probably throw the ball too. Riles team threw 55% of the time this year not an even split but it makes sense to me. He's also going to have a lot better talent at running here than he did in Oregon. Voted Yea and am very happy. GBR! T_O_B Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.