Saunders Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Ohio State won a championship. That's great for the conference. But it just shows how lopsided the Big Ten's divisions will continue to get in the future. http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/1/16/7555073/big-ten-football-ohio-state-west-division Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 This seems like de ja vu. It was exactly the same in the Big 12 with OU and Texas in the south against the little's of the north once Snyder retired. Quote Link to comment
Comish Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Blah, Blah, Blah........... Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt96 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Only time will tell. The West really needs to kick it into gear. Nebraska & Iowa have not helped the West at all. Hopefully Riley can get NU over the hump. As for OSU & MSU being the top two that is correct, but NU could have easily beaten MSU had they pulled their head out of there a$$es earlier in the game. Nebraska never seemed to get better or improve as the year went on with Pelini. Hopefully that will be another change under Riley. Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Step One: let's own the West. 1 Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 I wonder what the perception wouldve been if Ohio St woulda beat Wisconsin by 7, and still went on to win the national title. Seems they forget that Michigan is garbage. Penn St is garbage even with new coach. That Minnesota almost beat Ohio St. That Nebraska almost beat Michigan St. Seems their comparison of the East to the West is much like that of the SEC to the rest of the country. While most wont argue it's better, the gap isnt that wide. And there's a lot of assuming that Franklin and Harbaugh will be major successes, and that Riley wont. 3 Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Only time will tell. The West really needs to kick it into gear. Nebraska & Iowa have not helped the West at all. Hopefully Riley can get NU over the hump. As for OSU & MSU being the top two that is correct, but NU could have easily beaten MSU had they pulled their head out of there a$$es earlier in the game. Nebraska never seemed to get better or improve as the year went on with Pelini. Hopefully that will be another change under Riley. Or, one could go another direction and say Nebraska was at best the fifth best team in the B1G after losing to Michigan State, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. I doubt we'll ever be able to recruit like Ohio State and Michigan. Our focus needs to be similar to Michigan State's where we just outwork everyone else. Michigan State is similar to Kansas State where they don't have the talent year in and year out, but they have the coaching. This is where we have to go. 1 Quote Link to comment
Hooked on Huskers Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 CANCELLED CCG ! Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Ohio St, probably not. But please explain what Michigan has that we dont. Does Michigan have a sh#t ton of instate talent? I guess I really dont know. Obviously it's more than Nebraska, cuz that's not saying much, but to me there doesnt seem to be this perception that Michigan is some recruiting hotbed. I'm sick of the perception that Michigan can do so much better recruiting than Nebraska. Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted January 16, 2015 Author Share Posted January 16, 2015 Alot of it has to do with recruiting. Sam McKewon was hitting on this the other day. The #B1G has 27 commits in ESPN 300. 24 from the #B1G East. 3 from the #B1G West. OSU(9), PSU(9), MSU(3), Mich(3), NU(2), Ill(1). #sobering The #B1G has 24 commits inside the Rivals 250. 21 from the #B1G East. 3 from #B1G West. OSU(8), PSU(7), MSU(3), Mich(3), NU(3). #sobering The #B1G has 38 commits in Scout 300. 30 from #B1G East. 8 from #B1G West. PSU(10) OSU(10) MSU(6) Mich(4) Wis(3) NU(2) NW(1) Iowa(1) Ill(1) The #B1G has 28 commits inside 247's Top 247. 25 from #B1G East. 3 from #B1G West. OSU(10), PSU(10), MSU(3), Mich(2), UW(2), NU(1) #sobering The #B1G has 26 commits inside 247's Composite. 23 from #B1G East. 3 from #B1G West. OSU(9) PSU(9) Mich(3) MSU(2) NU(1) Ill(1) #sobering Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Ohio St, probably not. But please explain what Michigan has that we dont. Does Michigan have a sh#t ton of instate talent? I guess I really dont know. Obviously it's more than Nebraska, cuz that's not saying much, but to me there doesnt seem to be this perception that Michigan is some recruiting hotbed. I'm sick of the perception that Michigan can do so much better recruiting than Nebraska. You can't just look at the home state's population and say that's that. The surrounding population near Michigan is way bigger. They get a lot of recruits from Ohio. Nebraska borders Iowa, North Dakota, Kansas. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Ohio St, probably not. But please explain what Michigan has that we dont. Does Michigan have a sh#t ton of instate talent? I guess I really dont know. Obviously it's more than Nebraska, cuz that's not saying much, but to me there doesnt seem to be this perception that Michigan is some recruiting hotbed. I'm sick of the perception that Michigan can do so much better recruiting than Nebraska. You can't just look at the home state's population and say that's that. The surrounding population near Michigan is way bigger. They get a lot of recruits from Ohio. Nebraska borders Iowa, North Dakota, Kansas. But what's the draw? Climates similar. Current prestige of the program is, well, equal I guess. Probably just my bias. But I guess I just dont see what Michigan has to sell. Why cant we compete with those guys in recruiting? Everyone just seems to write us off. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Ohio St, probably not. But please explain what Michigan has that we dont. Does Michigan have a sh#t ton of instate talent? I guess I really dont know. Obviously it's more than Nebraska, cuz that's not saying much, but to me there doesnt seem to be this perception that Michigan is some recruiting hotbed. I'm sick of the perception that Michigan can do so much better recruiting than Nebraska. You can't just look at the home state's population and say that's that. The surrounding population near Michigan is way bigger. They get a lot of recruits from Ohio. Nebraska borders Iowa, North Dakota, Kansas. But what's the draw? Climates similar. Current prestige of the program is, well, equal I guess. Probably just my bias. But I guess I just dont see what Michigan has to sell. Why cant we compete with those guys in recruiting? Everyone just seems to write us off. If everything else is even, distance from home still gives Michigan a big advantage. Closeness to home is important to a lot of recruits, and Michigan is closer to home for more recruits than is Nebraska. 1 Quote Link to comment
shyndy Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Ohio St, probably not. But please explain what Michigan has that we dont. Does Michigan have a sh#t ton of instate talent? I guess I really dont know. Obviously it's more than Nebraska, cuz that's not saying much, but to me there doesnt seem to be this perception that Michigan is some recruiting hotbed. I'm sick of the perception that Michigan can do so much better recruiting than Nebraska. You can't just look at the home state's population and say that's that. The surrounding population near Michigan is way bigger. They get a lot of recruits from Ohio.Nebraska borders Iowa, North Dakota, Kansas. You forget Missouri though Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 But we're talking about a whoppin 20-25 prospects per year. And for a program like Nebraska that recruits nationally, that means we have a lesser need from that region than they do. Hence, I still dont see the big advantage or draw to Michigan making it so easy to assume that they can out recruit us all the time, and using that to justify the assumption that they'll "get back" but we wont. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.