Hillary Clinton lies...

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

 

How many times do we have to talk about the liberal bias at politifact.

 

http://www.politifactbias.com/

 

http://townhall.com/columnists/brentbozell/2016/06/29/the-liberal-tilt-at-politifact-n2185076

 

http://humanevents.com/2012/08/30/politifact-bias-does-the-gop-tell-nine-times-more-lies-than-left-really/

 

http://www.newsmax.com/Reagan/PolitiFact-Fact-Checkers-Bias/2015/03/20/id/631565/

 

We've talked about it plenty, but I'm guessing you're going to continue to bring it up.

 

Well when your source for arguing a message that one party or candidate lies more than the other has been discredited, it's kind of hard to make the argument.

[Danny Bateman]

A week of whoppers from Donald Trump

 

Nice little breakdown of just ONE week's worth of BS from her esteemed opponent. These lies range from relatively benign to rather egregious ones designed to smear his opponent's stances to one in particular that showed his dangerous ignorance about the actual role and responsibilities of government officials.

 

It is telling, though, that most all his lies serve one of two purposes: damage an opponent, or erase a (legitimate) criticism of himself. The thought of a guy who can never admit he was wrong, to the point of it almost being pathological, and instead always opts to lie and self-aggrandize is legitimately a bit unsettling.

 

I cannot believe that people think that this guy is any more truthful than Clinton. I guess that "tells it like it is" moniker really gets people to overlook a lot.

[HuskerNation1]

Hmm...in the most recent dump of documents by the FBI, Hillary's IT Director referred to the "Hillary Cover-up Operation" just before all her emails were deleted.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-cover-up-operation-robby-mook-2016-9

[BigRedBuster]

These emails are distracting from her message......oh wait....That's Trump's go to line now, not hers.

[TGHusker]

http://www.wsj.com/articles/james-comeys-clinton-immunity-1475017121

 

Some quotes:

 

FBI Director James Comeyappears Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee, where he’ll get another chance to explain his agency’s double standard regarding Hillary Clinton.His probe of the former Secretary of State’s private email server is looking more like a kid-glove exercise with each new revelation.

House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetzon Friday disclosed that the FBI granted immunity to Mrs. Clinton’s top aides as part of its probe into whether Mrs. Clinton mishandled classified information. According to Mr. Chaffetz, this “limited” immunity was extended to former chief of staff Cheryl Millsand senior adviser Heather Samuelson,in order to get them to surrender their laptops, which they’d used to sort through Mrs. Clinton’s work-versus-personal emails.

 

We’d also love to hear what the FBI made of the news that Mrs. Clinton maintained a Gmail account. The Democratic presidential nominee has never disclosed this detail. Speaking of revealing, President Obamahas publicly said he found out about Mrs. Clinton’s server through “news reports.” Yet the FBI notes reveal that he emailed Mrs. Clinton on her private server under a pseudonym. Ms. Abedin told the FBI that the White House was notified when Mrs. Clinton changed her email address so the President’s secure server wouldn’t exclude her emails. Was Mr. Obama fibbing too?

These columns have long opposed the appointment of special prosecutors, but that depends on the ability of established legal officers to do their jobs without political favor. Mr. Comey’s handling of the Clinton case understandably makes Americans wonder if their government can be trusted to perform this duty. On the evidence of the FBI’s special treat for Mrs. Clinton and her aides, they are right to wonder.

 

 

 

One poster said it accurately in the comments section:

All of the smoke and mirrors is because President Obama, while using a pseudonym emailed Hillary Clinton multiple times on the private server. To indict her would be to indict him. Hence the "extremely careless" non-indictment on the part of Comey.

[HuskerNation1]

It appears Hillary's lying ways as a government official was contagious as many members of her staff have also been proven to have lied while under investigation. Regardless of your party affiliation, this is just completely ludicrous that so many government officials are blatantly lying while under investigation. Richard Nixon must be rolling in his grave now realizing he could have stayed in office based upon today's standards.

 

http://nypost.com/2016/09/28/the-fbis-hillary-email-probe-is-looking-even-more-like-a-coverup/