deedsker

59 Minnesota wins a cluster. I honestly didn’t think I was that high on them.

Going to the game was one of the best/worst things I got to be a part of. That defense was just insane. I remember the Oklahoma game saying, "Just keep punting, our defense will win the game." They ended up doing just that. Insane.

I liked the part where he downplayed a global pandemic and made it political so more people could suffer and die. Those were some really good things.

I don't know what Barrett Sallee is drinking this morning, but maybe we should check his cup. Purdue lost what is looking like a possible starter quality NFL QB and head coach that built the program from scraps. Not a good sign he is the only one high on us.

Just glad to see your happy that SS works as a method of keeping a majority of people out of intense poverty due to outside forces or personal choices. It really is a remarkable program.

Don't know about replacements. I am fine with SS as is and wish the funds couldn't be appropriated by other functions of government so as to avoid fake funding issues. Without extra blockades, the program is quite remarkable.

And that is why the program was needed in the first place. It is a service to the many at the expense of many. If allowed to function properly without interference and additional made up rules/problems, it does serve it purpose well enough.

Once again, that isn't speaking to the theory laid out in the original post. If I got 50% returns a year I would be a billionaire and if I had wheels I would be a bike. Back to my #2 that you changed and BRB showed your flaw on. If you want "on my behalf" as employer contribution my original analysis is good if you want his money only the 60 years stands. I stated that out individually for you. Pick which awesome scenario this guy should be in. Depends on who I am talking to. My brother, yes. Warren Buffet, no. Is the program good for the general public, yes. Are rich people trying to dismantle it by making up rules to make the system hard, yes.

1) "By the time I..." implies it is real or realistic. 2) I laid that out in my post. The person must clearly be earlier in their career because they could have work 60 years without meeting the numbers state. Thus, it is mostly likely they are on the younger side doing futuristic calculations. Not enough data is provided, but conclusions can still be made in broad strokes. You just changed all the math. That is actually completely incorrect based on the post. 3) So they are even younger than I could potentially given them in their original post. At $160,000 cap, starting this year, they plan on working for 60.5 years. So they are 6 or 7. 4)Terrible returns if you make a lot. It is a social safety net and not a investment vehicle for the rich. It provides great returns for the less fortunate. 5) Cool. Do that and social security will just be a nice gift to have to help out others in your life at the end. Sounds good.

Already had the spreadsheets. I kinda thought I would have to go into the general idea of the program and not just a blatant worst case scenario from a pure numbers with no context scenario.

Funny. When you actually check into some data you find out: Total max taxable wages for the last 40 years is $3.54 million dollars. At 12.4% for both employer/employee this would only represent under $440 thousand dollars. This means he is likely talking $600 thousand (inflation adjusted dollars) and not gross. That being said, the owner of this account is likely young and is taking a swag at a lot of future earnings based on income now. Historically, the indexed value of the last 40 years is around 4.3%. So the assumption laid out with only a year or two of earnings would be someone making $121 thousand dollars a year. This would put them in near the top quartile of all household earners and about 170% of the median household. (He also states that this would be on "his behalf" so his household earnings could be easily twice as high). https://dqydj.com/average-median-top-household-income-percentiles/ So the joke seems to be: "Look at me, I make too much money on my W2. Social security, am I right?"

Who let Vermin Supreme get on TV? So this guy is just another GOP masquerading Putin enthusiast. We seem to be getting those in full force in the last decade or so.

It has been 8 years since we beat undefeated MSU under Riley. Truly low the last decade has been.

Tapegate!

Brain drain happens when you are a place young people don’t want to be because of the general political and economic outlook provided in your area. Generally speaking, it speaks to problems within and how to change moving forward.

Probably looking for "H" back type players that can be motioned in and out of FB, in-line TE, and motion counter type alignments. Not sure how that lines up with the talent/size of high caliber TE's we brought in under Frost. I "feel" like we have more receiving threat/oversized WR body types at the moment.

But your wrong foot might already be off.

He will be all right.

This one has Sims 284 (QB #24) and Thompson 725 (QB #69): https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/mock-draft-simulator This one has Sims 84 (QB #11) and Thompson NA of 434 (QB #NA of 38): https://www.profootballnetwork.com/mockdraft/ This one has Sims NA of 402 (QB #NA of 23) and Thompson NA of 402 (QB #NA of 23): https://fanspeak.com/ontheclock-nfl-mock-draft-simulator/preview.php?board_id=3 This one has Sims NA of 376 (QB #NA of 29) and Thompson NA of 376 (QB #NA of 29): https://fanspeak.com/ontheclock-nfl-mock-draft-simulator/preview.php?board_id=0 I only found him that high in one of the four I have used.

Can't wait for Ty Robinson or Wynn Jr. wearing number 4 or 7.

Total market collapse. That's who would handle it.

Pretty sure Elon is idiotic for not knowing, what I can only assume, one of the most well compensated employee does/is.

Objective complete! Now we need even more of you comrades to bind together to take back the motherland!

All you weirdos lurking around here can help us out. We can eliminate the Buffaloes from this wretched map.