T_O_Bull Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 This morning on "Mike and Mike" while discussing the NFL a comment was made that "the Tight End is the most under utilized weapon in (pro)football." That struck home with me and says something about Cally's style of play. I have always considered the TE a valuable part of the Husker offence, not only as a blocker but also as a receiver. For the last four years the TE has been the forgotten man. I went to our roster to check on the names of our TE's and I didn't really recognize any of them, I still remember Jeff Finn, Jr. Miller and Sheldon Jackson but I couldn't remember this years starter. Shame on me but more so shame on HCBC. This is a position that should never be under utilized. ...T_O_B Quote Link to comment
ICT HSKR 10 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 This morning on "Mike and Mike" while discussing the NFL a comment was made that "the Tight End is the most under utilized weapon in (pro)football." That struck home with me and says something about Cally's style of play. I have always considered the TE a valuable part of the Husker offence, not only as a blocker but also as a receiver. For the last four years the TE has been the forgotten man. I went to our roster to check on the names of our TE's and I didn't really recognize any of them, I still remember Jeff Finn, Jr. Miller and Sheldon Jackson but I couldn't remember this years starter. Shame on me but more so shame on HCBC. This is a position that should never be under utilized. ...T_O_B Especially the way Missouri brutilized us with their 2 tight ends. Would have been nice to see Martin Rucker follow his brother to NU, but he has had a better career at MU than he ever would have had at NU. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 We haven't had a real good tight end actually come to fruition in Callahan's tenure. I think that has A LOT to do with injury, no necessarily the way he works. Quote Link to comment
jdinger23 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Matt Herian was a bad ass at tight end.... even with him getting injured, he still broke the receiving yards record for tight ends at NU and was not fully utilized during his time here. Quote Link to comment
cmb23 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 I don't know if it isn't utilized...it's just a different offense than what we had before or what others run. Plus, we have been rotating in and out a number of different TE's vs. just having one receiving tight end and one blocking Tight End (Ex: Tracey Wistrom/Aaron Golliday) Here are the numbers as far back as the stats online at huskers.com for tight ends: (Year = Receptions/Yards/TD) '98 = 22/443/6 '99 = 27/633/3 '00 = 24/367/6 '01 = 26/402/3 '02 = 14/416/7 '03 = 24/499/3 '04 = 30/397/3 '05 = 22/165/0 '06 = 35/336/10 '07 = 26/380/4 To me it looks like the total number of TE receptions has remained VERY consistent and the yardage is fairly close (minus the '99 total which is big). TD's are within reason for the most part ('05 was off, but '06 was highest in 10 years). Take what you want from it. The TE's are getting the job done....at least as compared to what was getting done before. Also, out of all the 'great' Tight Ends that have come through (at least recently) how many have made it to the NFL? Sheldon was there for a few years. Wistrom didn't make it. Herian didn't make it. Other than Johnny Mitchell.....who has there been? A 'big game' tight end is a rare find. Quote Link to comment
numarimba82 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 I think we also remember some of the tight ends back in the option football days because they were great blockers or when we did pass, people remembered that. We pass so much more now that people forget about it. I can't honestly run down a list of the receivers we had in the mid and late 90's...I don't remember hardly any of them. Just a change in offense style. Quote Link to comment
cmb23 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Especially the way Missouri brutilized us with their 2 tight ends. Would have been nice to see Martin Rucker follow his brother to NU, but he has had a better career at MU than he ever would have had at NU. What Mizzou does with their tight ends is a rarity. They are BOTH go-to receivers and will be first day draft picks in the NFL. They aren't blockers first, pass-catchers second. That's their type of offense and it features them. Martin Rucker and Chase Coffman have combined for over 110 catches and over 1100 yards this season alone. Thats over 1/3 of Chase Daniel's completions and yards. Quote Link to comment
Spartness Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Before Matt Herian got injured in 2004, he was Daily's go to guy. Despite everything else, Callahan knew he was his best receiver. We just haven't had a dominant TE since then. Quote Link to comment
NPhusker Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 We dont even have a tight end anymore. Callahan had the wonderful idea to change them to H-backs, now that was a good idea. Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Another overlooked position under Clownahan's watchful eye would have to be the fullback. Walsh used the hell out of Rathman, but Clownahan has yet to use a fullback other than just another lineman. Quote Link to comment
billdozer15 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 I don't know if it isn't utilized...it's just a different offense than what we had before or what others run. Plus, we have been rotating in and out a number of different TE's vs. just having one receiving tight end and one blocking Tight End (Ex: Tracey Wistrom/Aaron Golliday) Here are the numbers as far back as the stats online at huskers.com for tight ends: (Year = Receptions/Yards/TD) '98 = 22/443/6 '99 = 27/633/3 '00 = 24/367/6 '01 = 26/402/3 '02 = 14/416/7 '03 = 24/499/3 '04 = 30/397/3 '05 = 22/165/0 '06 = 35/336/10 '07 = 26/380/4 To me it looks like the total number of TE receptions has remained VERY consistent and the yardage is fairly close (minus the '99 total which is big). TD's are within reason for the most part ('05 was off, but '06 was highest in 10 years). Take what you want from it. The TE's are getting the job done....at least as compared to what was getting done before. Also, out of all the 'great' Tight Ends that have come through (at least recently) how many have made it to the NFL? Sheldon was there for a few years. Wistrom didn't make it. Herian didn't make it. Other than Johnny Mitchell.....who has there been? A 'big game' tight end is a rare find. Good job on the research. I was thinking we still use them fairly well, it's just the fact we dont have an outstanding go to guy at TE. I really think Callahans offense could work and work very well if it weren't him calling the plays. He is far to conservative and needs to mix in more misdirection and stop being so predictable. I think a mobile QB would make all the difference in the world as well, as we have seen with Ganz. I think the TE could get even more involved with a mobile QB, they would provide excellent dump offs with a QB rolling out and could also provide great down field blocking if the QB decides to keep the ball and go. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 We dont even have a tight end anymore. Callahan had the wonderful idea to change them to H-backs, now that was a good idea. Considering the talent at the position, I can't say I disagree with the H back look. As for fullbacks, well, I guess you get what you get. Callahan doesn't use a full back A LOT. Whether that's "wrong" or "right" is subjective. He just doesn't. Kind of like before Callahan, we hardly threw to receivers. I don't think it's right or wrong, it's just the kind of ball that was played. Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Yeah, but didn't we play an entire season where the fullback never once run with the ball? I believe it was 05. We at least threw to the receivers once in a while when we were running the option. Some of the best teams in the NFL running the WCO use the tight end and the fullback. We just don't. Quote Link to comment
Necava Husker Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Too bad Cally didn’t manage the recruiting of TEs Martin Rucker (Mizzou) or Joe Jon Finley (OU). These guys should have been a lock to play for the Huskers, since both had big brothers at NU (Mike Rucker and Clint Finley). What kind of a head coach could screw up a couple of recruiting slam dunks like this? Also, I don’t think anyone above mentioned Johnny Mitchell, a pretty good TE by any measure. Quote Link to comment
cmb23 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Too bad Cally didn’t manage the recruiting of TEs Martin Rucker (Mizzou) or Joe Jon Finley (OU). These guys should have been a lock to play for the Huskers, since both had big brothers at NU (Mike Rucker and Clint Finley). What kind of a head coach could screw up a couple of recruiting slam dunks like this? Also, I don’t think anyone above mentioned Johnny Mitchell, a pretty good TE by any measure. There haven't been that many posts to not find it. I said it in my first post..... Also, out of all the 'great' Tight Ends that have come through (at least recently) how many have made it to the NFL? Sheldon was there for a few years. Wistrom didn't make it. Herian didn't make it. Other than Johnny Mitchell.....who has there been? A 'big game' tight end is a rare find. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.